Between Sponge and Titanium: Designing Micro and Macro Features for the Resilient Organization

Chapter

Abstract

Many contemporary organization s must deal with high levels of environmental uncertainty, complexity and equivocality , struggling with not only strong competitive pressures but also increasing uncertainty related to sociopolitical and economic trends within the frame of a risk society. The centrality of resilience in contemporary managerial discourse is mostly related to the social, political, environmental and economic turmoil and jolts, to which organizations have been exposed during the past decades. Organizational survival is therefore increasingly challenged, and to survive and prosper, organizations must transform jolts and shocks into new and resilient solutions. Organizational resilience refers to the ability of an organization to continue to meet its core functions by finding and implementing in a fast and timely manner organizational micro and microstructure able to transform uncertainty into new solutions. While the progressive turbulence of the external environment requires organizations to be more resilient, the design of organizational resilience appears to be still limited to its adaptability to the external environment. Within this context, this chapter draws an original proposal on the design of resilient organizations considering both micro/individual-level and macro/design-level features.

References

  1. Arthur, J. B., & Boyles, T. (2007). Developing the human resource system structure: A levels-based framework for strategic HRM research. Human Resource Management Review, 17(1), 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, C. K. (1994). Organizational learning and continuous quality improvement in an automotive manufacturing organization. Ph.D. dissertation, University Microfilms, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, C. K., & Pratt, M. G. (2000). From threat-rigidity to flexibility-toward a learning model of autogenic crisis in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, B. E., & Gerhart, B. (1996). Human resources and organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal (Special Issue: Human Resources and Organizational Performance), 39(4), 779–801.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, M. A. (2002). The five principles of organizational resilience. Gartner Research. [online] http://www.gartner.com/id=351410. Accessed March 18, 2015.
  8. Brown, J., Mulhern, G., & Joseph, S. (2002). Incident-related stressors, locus of control, coping, and psychological distress among firefighters in Northern Ireland. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 15, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of innovation. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  10. Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (1988). Opportunism, incentives, and the M-form hypothesis: A laboratory study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 10(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2004). Strategic organizational diagnosis and design: The dynamics of fit (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burton, R. M., Lauridsen, J., & Obel, B. (2002). Return on assets loss from situational and contingency misfits. Management Science, 48(11), 1461–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, F. C. (2008). Elements of metallurgy and engineering alloys. Materials Park, OH: ASM International.Google Scholar
  14. Carroll, T. (2012). Designing organizations for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Organization Design, 1(2), 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cascio, W. F. (2012). Methodological issues in international HR management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(12), 2532–2545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1962). Strategy and structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, R. S., & Wartofsky, M. W. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. In H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela, Autopoiesis (Vol. 42, pp. v–vi). The Netherlands: Reidel, Dortrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Collins, J. & Porras, J. I. (1994). Built to last. Successful habits of visionary companies. Harper Collins Pub. Inc: New York, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Coutu, D. L. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 46–56.Google Scholar
  20. Cox, T. (1987). Stress, coping and problem solving. Work & Stress, 1(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cunha, M. P., & Cunha, J. V. (2006). Towards a complexity theory of strategy. Management Decision, 44(7), 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1, 299–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Donaldson, L., & Joffe, G. (2014). Fit-the key to organizational design. Journal of Organization Design, 3(3), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. (1965). Causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeman, S. F., Hirschhorn, L., & Maltz, M. (2004). The power of moral purpose: Sandler O’Neill & Partners in the aftermath of september 11th, 2001. Organization Development Journal, 22(4), 69–81.Google Scholar
  27. Gunz, H., & Mayrhofer, W. (2011). Re-conceptualizing career success: A contextual approach. Journal for Labour Market Research, 43(3), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Håkonsson, D. D., Klaas, P., & Carroll, T. N. (2013). The structural properties of sustainable, continuous change: Achieving reliability through flexibility. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(2), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall, D. J., & Saias, M. A. (1980). Strategy follows structure! Strategic Management Journal, 1(2), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2004). CEOs who have COOs: Contingency analysis of an unexplored structural form. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 959–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hedberg, B. L. T. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Design (Vol. 1, pp. 3–27). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hedberg, B. L. T., Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Helfat, C. E., & Samina, K. (2014). Fit between organization design and organizational routines. Journal of Organization Design, 3(2), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jex, S. M., Bliese, P. D., Buzzell, S., & Primeau, J. (2001). The impact of self-efficacy on stressor-strain relations: Coping style as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012). Managing risks: A new framework. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 48–61.Google Scholar
  36. Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Elements of resilience after the world trade center disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s emergency operations center. Disasters, 27(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2003). Beyond bouncing back: The concept of organizational resilience. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  40. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5), 738–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lepak, D. P., Marrone, J. A., & Takeuchi, R. (2004). The relativity of human HR systems: Conceptualising the impact of desired employee contributions and HR philosophy. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(6/7), 639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewin, K. (1953). Studies in group decision. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group Dynamics. New York: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
  44. Mallak, L. A. (1998). Putting organizational resilience to work. Industrial Management, 40(6), 8–13.Google Scholar
  45. Maturana, H. R. (1970). Biology of cognition. In H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela (Eds.), Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (No. 42) (pp. 1–58). (1980). The Netherlands: Reidel, Dortrecht.Google Scholar
  46. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1973). Autopoiesis: The organization of living. In H. R Maturana & F. J. Varela (Eds.). (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (No. 42) (pp. 59–143). The Netherlands: Reidel, Dortrecht.Google Scholar
  47. Mayrhofer, W., Meyer, M., & Steyrer, J. (2007). Contextual issues in the study of careers. In H. P. Gunz & M. A. Peiperl (Eds.), Handbook of career studies (pp. 215–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miles, R., & Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  49. Miles, R. E., Miles, G., & Snow, C. C. (2006). Collaborative entrepreneurship: A business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mintzberg, H. (1990). Strategy formation: Schools of thought. In J. F. Fredrickson (Ed.), Perspectives on strategic management. Philadelphia, PA: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  51. Moos, R. H., & Schaefer, J. A. 1993. Coping resources and processes: Current concepts and measures. In L Goldberger & S Breznits (Eds), Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects (2nd ed.) (pp. 234–257). The Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
  52. Padgett, J. F. (1992). The alchemist of contingency theory: Review essay on Stinchcombe. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1462–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perrewé, P. L., et al. (2002). Are work stress relationships universal? A nine-region examination of role stressors, general self-efficacy, and burnout. Journal of International Management, 8(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poole, M. (1990). Editorial: Human resource management in an international perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  55. Puranam, P. (2012). A future for the science of organization design. Journal of Organization Design, 1(1), 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reinmoeller, P., & van Baardwijk, N. (2005). The link between diversity and resilience. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(4), 61–65.Google Scholar
  57. Schein, E. H. (1978). Career dynamics: Matching individual and organizational needs. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  58. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Schoonhoven, C. B. (1981). Problems with contingency theory: Testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schuler, R. S. (1992). Strategic human resources management: Linking the people with the strategic needs of the business. Organizational Dynamics, 21(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulman, P. R. (1993). The negotiated order of organizational reliability. Admin Soc, 25, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scullion, H. (2005). International HRM: An introduction. In H. Scullion & M. Linehan (Eds.), International human resource management: A critical text (pp. 3–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Sheremata, W. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 389–408.Google Scholar
  64. Shimizu, T., Mizoue, T., Kubota, S., Mishima, N., & Nagata, S. (2003). Relationship between burnout and communication skill training among Japanese hospital nurses: A pilot study. Journal of Occupational Health, 45(3), 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for Resilience. In K. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Chapter 7 (pp. 94–110). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  67. Välikangas, L., & Romme, A. G. L. (2013). How to design for strategic resilience. Journal of Organization Design, 2(2), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015). Managing risk and resilience. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 971–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vogus, T. J., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007, October). Organizational resilience: Towards a theory and a research agenda. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Montreal, Canada, 2007. ISIC. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 3418–3422).Google Scholar
  70. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950a). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 111(2872), 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1950b). An outline of general system theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 134–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 628–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  74. Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  75. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
  76. Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  77. Woods, D. D. (2006). Essential characteristics of resilience. In E. Hollnagel, D. D. Woods, & N. Leveson (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts (pp. 21–34). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and Management and LUISS Business SchoolLUISS Guido Carli UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.Università Cattolica Del Sacro CuoreMilan (Piacenza campus)Italy

Personalised recommendations