Collaborative Spaces and Coworking as Hybrid Workspaces: Friends or Foes of Learning and Innovation?

Chapter

Abstract

This contribution is oriented toward understanding collaborative workspaces and their impact on innovation. More in detail, the authors propose a focus on Coworking spaces as recent and disruptive innovation in the workspace template. Far from being just a logistic business solution, Coworking encompasses a complex social phenomenon, which combines work solutions, learning opportunities, and social relations. Thus, the contribution will speculate on Coworking as a hybrid organizational layout. Authors analyze this phenomenon from a theoretical standpoint that combines organizational design with innovation management principles. In particular, the contribution is structured in order to account for opportunities and threats provided by such collaborative spaces.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Innovation and growth: How business contributes to society. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcese, G., Flammini, S., Lucchetti, M. C., & Mortara, L. (2016). The influence of emerging technologies on business models dynamics: The case of IT IS 3D. R&D Management Conference 2016 From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation 3–6 July 2016. UK: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  3. Arcese, G., Flammini, S., Lucchetti, M. C., & Martucci, O. (2015). Evidence and experience of open sustainability innovation practices in the food sector. Sustainability, 7(7), 8067–8090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcese, G., Flammini, S., & Medina Azevedo, J. (2016). open innovation in the food & beverage industry: Green supply chain, logistic operations and innovation, special issue on: Environment, health and business management: Linking efficiency and effectiveness to viable sustainability. International Journal of Environment and Health. Inderscience Publisher. doi: 10.1504/IJENVH.2015.077137.
  5. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s mine is yours: How collaborative consumption is changing the way we live.Google Scholar
  6. Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2414121.
  7. Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(03).Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H., & Brunswicker, S. (2013). Managing open innovation in large firms. Berkeley, CA: Fraunhofer Verlag.Google Scholar
  10. Chesbrough, H., & Crowther, A. K. (2006). Beyond high tech: Early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Management, 36(3), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deskmag. (2017). http://www.deskmag.com/.
  12. Dewar, R. D., & Dutton, J. E. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 32(11), 1422–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class, and how it is transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, C., Clark, J., & Soete, L. (1982). Unemployment and technical innovation: A study of long waves and economic development. London: Burns & Oates.Google Scholar
  15. Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera, 15(1), 193.Google Scholar
  16. Gassmann, O., & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: Three core process archetypes. In R&D management conference, vol. 6.Google Scholar
  17. Geroski, P. A. (2000). Models of technology diffusion. Research policy, 29(4), 603–625.Google Scholar
  18. I Love Mum. (2017). http://ilovemum.it.
  19. L’Alveare. (2017). http://www.lalveare.it.
  20. Lévy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence. New York: Plenum/Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Lichtenthaler, U., & Lichtenthaler, E. (2009). A capability-based framework for open innovation: Complementing absorptive capacity. Journal of Management Studies, 46(8), 1315–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mind the bridge. (2015). http://mindthebridge.com/.
  24. Moriset, B., & Malecki, E. J. (2009). Organization versus space: The paradoxical geographies of the digital economy. Geography Compass, 3(1), 256–274.Google Scholar
  25. Mortara, L., & Ford, S. J. (2012). Technology Acquisitions. A guided approach to technology acquisition and protection decisions. publications.eng.cam.ac.uk.
  26. O’reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0.Google Scholar
  27. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Panetta, K. (2017). Top trends in the Gartner Hype Cycle for emerging technologies, 2017. Enterprises should explain the business potential of blockchain, artificial intelligence and augmented reality. Available at: http://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/top-trends-in-the-gartner-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2017/.
  29. Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 261–271.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, G. M., & Zhdanov, A. (2013). R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity. Review of Financial Studies, 26(1), 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.Google Scholar
  32. Schmookler, J. (1966). Innovation and economic growth. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle (1912/1934).Google Scholar
  34. Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sundsted, T., Jones, D., & Bacigalupo, T. (2009). I’m Outta Here: How co-working is making the office obsolete. Lulu.com.
  36. Talent Garden TAG. (2017). https://talentgarden.org.
  37. Utterback, J. M. (1971). The process of technological innovation within the firm. Academy of Management Journal, 14(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Meel, J., Martens, Y., & van Ree, H. J. (2010). Planning office spaces: A practical guide for managers and designers. London: Laurence King.Google Scholar
  39. Wahab, S. A., Rose, R. C., & Osman, S. I. W. (2012). Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: A literature analysis. International Business Research, 5, 1.Google Scholar
  40. Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. (1997). Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2), 109–125.Google Scholar
  41. Waters-Lynch, J. M., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., & Hurley, J. (2016). Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2712217 or  10.2139/ssrn.2712217.
  42. Wyld, D. C., & Maurin, R. (2009). Keys to innovation: The right measures and the right culture? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 96–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.University of Bari Aldo MoroBariItaly

Personalised recommendations