Skip to main content

Entrepreneurship Under Risk and Uncertainty: A Review of the Experimental Evidence

Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has been devoted in an effort to identify the behavioural traits that distinguish entrepreneurs from other people. A strand of the literature investigates the attitudes that entrepreneurs exhibit towards uncertainty, either objective (risk) or subjective (ambiguity). Indeed, the standard theory predicts that people, who are involved in entrepreneurial activities, tend to have distinct risk and ambiguity attitudes compared to those who engage in salary-paid employment. Nevertheless, the empirical evidence on this topic, based on field data, is mixed. Recently, methods from the experimental economics literature have been employed in order to shred light to this issue. This chapter provides an extensive review of the literature that experimentally studies the correlation between uncertainty attitudes and entrepreneurial decision making. The chapter concludes with a discussion of potential paths for further research.

Keywords

  • Risk
  • Ambiguity
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Experiment
  • Aversion to uncertainty

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_5
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-62455-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Andersen, S., Harisson, G., Lau, M., & Ruström, E. (2008). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica, 76, 583–618.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S., Di Girolamo, A., Harrison, G., & Lau, M. (2014). Risk and time preferences of entrepreneurs: Evidence from a Danish field experiment. Theory and Decision, 77, 341–357.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Asterbo, T., Herz, H., Nanda, R., & Weber, R. (2014). Seeking the roots of entrepreneurship: Insights from behavioral economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister-Lamp, K., Schade, C., & Levesque, M. (2012). Are entrepreneurs influenced by risk attitude, regulatory focus or both? An experiment on entrepreneurs’ time allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 456–476.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai Sur la Nature Général. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S., Epstein, L., & Segal, U. (1991). Mixture symmetry and quadratic utility. Econometrica, 59, 139–163.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Comeig, I., Holt, C. A., & Jaramillo-Gutiérrez, A. (2015). Dealing with risk: Gender, stakes, and probability effects. Discussion papers in economic behaviour from University of Valencia, ERI-CES, (No. 2/15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of European Economic Association, 9, 522–550.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Elston, J., Harrison, G., & Ruström, E. (2006). Experimental economics, entrepreneurs and the entry decision. Technical Report Working paper 6, University of Central Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etner, J., Jeleva, M., & Tallon, J. M. (2012). Decision theory under ambiguity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(2), 234–270.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Filippin, A., & Crosetto, P. (2016). A reconsideration of gender differences in risk attitudes. Management Science, 62, 11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hambock, C., Hopp, C., Keles, C., & Vetschera, R. (2017). Risk Aversion in Entrepreneurship Panels: Measurement Problems and Alternative Explanations. Managerial and Decision Economics, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, D. (1992). Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18, 391–414.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G., & List, J. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 1009–1055.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G., & Ruström, E. (2008a). Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral. Experimental Economics, 12, 133.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, G., & Ruström, E. (2008b). Risk aversion in the laboratory. In J. Cox & G. Harrison (Eds.), Research in experimental economics (Vol. 12, pp. 41–196). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. (2014). Chapter 14 – choice under uncertainty: Empirical methods and experimental results. In M. Machina & K. Viscusi (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of risk and uncertainty (Vol. 1, pp. 809–850). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J., & Orme, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62, 1291–1326.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J., Lotito, G., & Maffioletti, A. (2010). The descriptive and predictive adequacy of theories of decision making under uncertainty/ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 41, 81–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, H., Opper, S., & Nee, V. (2013). Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: An economic experiment in China. Management Science, 59, 1671–1687.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2014). Assessment and estimation of risk preferences. In M. Machina & K. Viscusi (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of risk and uncertainty (Vol. 1, pp. 135–201). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R., & Laffont, J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 710–748.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R., & van Praag, M. (2016). Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Management Science, 62, 2897–2915.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S., Meier, F., & Niemand, T. (2016). Experimental methods in entrepreneurship research: The status quo. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 22, 958–983.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • List, J., & Manson, C. (2011). Are CEOs expected utility maximisers? Journal of Econometrics, 162, 114–123.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loomes, G., & Pogrebna, G. (2014). Measuring individual risk attitudes when preferences are imprecise. The Economic Journal, 124, 569–593.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Macko, A., & Tyszka, T. (2009). Entrepreneurship and risk taking. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 3, 469–487.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Masclet, M., Colombier, N., Denant-Boemont, L., & Loheac, Y. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 470–484.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323–343.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sandri, S., Schade, C., Mußhoff, O., & Odening, M. (2010). Holding on for too long? An experimental study on inertial in entrepreneurs’ and non-entrepreneurs’ disinvestment choices. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76, 30–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, S., & van de Kuilen, G. (2015). Ambiguity attitudes. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 89–116). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, S., & Vieider, F. (2012). Social influences on risk attitudes: Applications in economics. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk (pp. 575–600). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos Georgalos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Georgalos, K. (2018). Entrepreneurship Under Risk and Uncertainty: A Review of the Experimental Evidence. In: Tur Porcar, A., Ribeiro Soriano, D. (eds) Inside the Mind of the Entrepreneur. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62455-6_5

Download citation