Abstract
Who benefits when philosophers and engineers get involved in academic conversations with one another? Such conversations are often one-way streets, with philosophers offering conceptual tools, insights, and modes of inquiry that serve as contributions toward developing the philosophy of engineering and influencing practices of reflective engineering and engineering education. However, philosophers also stand to benefit from closer conversational contact with engineers, as it can bring helpful challenges not only with regard to some of philosophy’s basic assumptions, but also with regard to its common classroom practices. In this paper I take a hard look at one of these practices: the teaching of critical thinking. Long a staple within the philosophy curriculum in the US, critical thinking has in recent years been taken by those in professional engineering communities to play an important role in the formation of future engineers. I suggest that the approach to critical thinking which would be most useful to engineers would be one that underscores the value of heuristics. Such an approach to teaching critical thinking within the context of philosophy, however, is not the norm; in fact, teaching materials associated with critical thinking tend to be deeply suspicious of heuristical reasoning. Philosophy can learn from engineering about the value of heuristical reasoning as a form of critical thinking; here is a case in point, I propose, where engineering knowledge can improve philosophical knowledge.
References
ABET. (1997). “Engineering Criteria 2000.” Retrieved from http://www.onlineethics.org/cms/8944.aspx#n2000.
British Petroleum. (2010). Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report (8 September).
Christ, Carol T. (2008). “What is Happening in Liberal Education?” Proceedings of the 2008 Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education, 21–29.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. (2013). Wikipedia (27 June). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deepwater_Horizon_oil_spill
Goldberg, David E. (2008). “What Engineers Don’t Learn and Why They Don’t Learn It: And How Philosophy Might Be Able to Help.” Presented at the Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering (WPE), (London: The Royal Academy of Engineering).
Floridi, Luciano. (2009). “Logical Fallacies as Informational Shortcuts,” Synthese, 167(2), 317–325.
Kahneman, Daniel. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Macmillan.
Koen, Billy V. (2003). Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer’s Approach to Problem Solving. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Koshland, Catherine P. (2010). “Liberal Arts and Engineering.” In Domenico Grasso and Melody Burkins, eds., Holistic Engineering Education: Beyond Technology (Dordrecht: Springer Press).
Michelfelder, Diane. (2008). “Artes Liberales and Ethics for Engineers.” Presented at the Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering (WPE), London: The Royal Academy of Engineering.
Michelfelder, Diane. (2009). “Engineering and the Liberal Arts: Toward Academic Cosmopolitanism,” Proceedings of the 2009 Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education, 13–23.
NAE National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Pereira, Luis M. and Ludwig Krippahl. (2007). “On Teaching Critical Thinking to Engineering Students,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Thinking , Norrköping, Sweden, (17–21 June).
Pitt, Joseph C. (2013). “Fitting Engineering into Philosophy.” In Diane P. Michelfelder, Natasha McCarthy, and David E. Goldberg, eds., Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice, Principles and Process (Dordrecht: Springer Press), 91–101.
“Q&A: Trevor Pinch.” (2013). IEEE Spectrum, (May).
Rainbolt, George W. and Sandra L. Dwyer. (2012). Critical Thinking: The Art of Argument. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Robison, Wade L. (2013). “Rules of Skill: Ethics in Engineering.” In Diane P. Michelfelder, Natasha McCarthy, and David E. Goldberg, eds., Philosophy and Engineering: Reflections on Practice Principles and Process, (Dordrecht: Springer Press).
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter and Robert Fogelin. (2010). Understanding Arguments: An Introduction to Informal Logic. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Thaler, Richard H. and Cass R. Sunstein. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.
Vaughn, Lewis. (2010). The Power of Critical Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Whelen, Debra Lau. (2004). “13,000 Kids Can’t Be Wrong,” School Library Journal, 50(2), 46–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michelfelder, D.P. (2018). Critical Thinking and Heuristics: What Philosophy Can Learn from Engineering about the Back of the Envelope. In: Mitcham, C., LI, B., Newberry, B., ZHANG, B. (eds) Philosophy of Engineering, East and West. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62448-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62450-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)