Advertisement

A Simulator’s Specifications for Studying Students’ Engagement in a Classroom

  • Latha Subramainan
  • Moamin A Mahmoud
  • Mohd Sharifuddin Ahmad
  • Mohd Zaliman Mohd Yusoff
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 620)

Abstract

In this paper, we highlight the issues of poor students’ engagement in classrooms and identify the attributes for the environmental settings of a proposed simulator to study the problem of students’ poor engagement from the students’ emotional demotion using agent-based social simulation concepts. The environmental settings of the simulation is classified into environmental factors and emotional factors. The environmental factors consist of a number of students, class session, class duration, type of subject, and year of study, while the emotional factors include the negative emotional states of student (e.g. anger, anxiety or boredom) and the emotional states of lecturers. In this simulation, a lecturer, who might have ideas on new strategies based on their experience, is able to insert a new strategy using a proposed Strategy Specification Settings Interface.

Keywords

Students’ Engagement Emotional Engagement Agent-Based Emotions Agent-Based Social Simulator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1. Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues.Google Scholar
  2. 2. Salleh, A. M., Desa, M. M., & Tuit, R. M. (2013). The Relationship between the Learning Ecology System and Students’ Engagement: A Case Study in Selangor. Asian Social Science, 9(12), 110.Google Scholar
  3. 3. Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer US.Google Scholar
  4. 4. Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115–124.Google Scholar
  5. 5. Kazmi, A. (2010). Sleepwalking through Undergrad: Using Student Engagement as an Institutional Alarm Clock. College Quarterly, 13(1), n1.Google Scholar
  6. 6. Castro, S., Granlund, M., & Almqvist, L. (2015). The relationship between classroom quality-related variables and engagement levels in Swedish preschool classrooms: a longitudinal study. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. 7. Kung-Keat, T., & Ng, J. (2016). Confused, bored, excited? An emotion based approach to the design of online learning systems. In 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings (pp. 221–233). Springer Singapore.Google Scholar
  8. 8. Subramainan, L., Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmad, M. S., & Yusoff, M. Z. M. (2016, August). A conceptual emotion-based model to improve students engagement in a classroom using agent-based social simulation. In User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2016 4th International Conference on (pp. 149–154). IEEE.Google Scholar
  9. 9. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765.Google Scholar
  10. 10. Kort, B., Reilly, R., & Picard, R. W. (2001). An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: Reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2001. Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on (pp. 43–46). IEEE.Google Scholar
  11. 11. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary educational psychology, 36(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
  12. 12. Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2015). Teaching this class drives me nuts!-Examining the person and context specificity of teacher emotions. PloS one, 10(6), e0129630.Google Scholar
  13. 13. Hagenauer, G., Hascher, T., & Volet, S. E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European journal of psychology of education, 30(4), 385–403.Google Scholar
  14. 14. Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). Introduction to emotions in education. International handbook of emotions in education, 1–10.Google Scholar
  15. 15. Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between-and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 715.Google Scholar
  16. 16. Tsouloupas, C. N., Carson, R. L., Matthews, R., Grawitch, M. J., & Barber, L. K. (2010). Exploring the association between teachers’ perceived student misbehaviour and emotional exhaustion: The importance of teacher efficacy beliefs and emotion regulation. Educational Psychology, 30(2), 173–189.Google Scholar
  17. 17. Papa-Gusho, L., & Biçaku-Çekrezi, R. (2015). Factors that Affect Effective Planning Skills of the Teacher in the Classrooms. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 4(3 S1), 560.Google Scholar
  18. 18. Bilash, O. (2009, May). Lesson Planning in the Language Classroom. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://sites.educ.ualberta.ca/staff/olenka.bilash-/Best%20of%20Bilash/lessonplanning.html
  19. 19. Making Effective Instructional Choices. (n.d.). Chapter (7), 133–145. Retrieved September 8, 2016, from http://teachingasleadership.org/sites/default/files/Related-Readings/IPD_Ch7_2011.pdf
  20. 20. Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027 (paperback: ISBN-0-8077-3182-X, $17.95; hardcover: ISBN-0-8077-3183-8).Google Scholar
  21. 21. Subramainan, L., Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmad, M. S., & Yusoff, M. Z. M. (2016). An Emotion-based Model for Improving Students’ Engagement using Agent-based Social Simulator. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(6).Google Scholar
  22. 22. Subramainan, L., Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmad, M. S., & Yusoff, M. Z. M. (2016, August). Evaluating students engagement in classrooms using agent-based social simulation. In Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), 2016 2nd International Symposium on (pp. 34–39). IEEE.Google Scholar
  23. 23. Subramainan, L., Yusoff, M. Z. M., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2015, August). A classification of emotions study in software agent and robotics applications research. In Agents, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), 2015 International Symposium on (pp. 41–46). IEEE.Google Scholar
  24. 24. Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2015, August). A self-adaptive customer-oriented framework for intelligent strategic marketing: A multi-agent system approach to website development for learning institutions. In Agents, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), 2015 International Symposium on (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  25. 25. Jassim, O. A., Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2015). A Multi-agent Framework for Research Supervision Management. In Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence, 12th International Conference (pp. 129–136). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. 26. Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2016, August). A prototype for context identification of scientific papers via agent-based text mining. In Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), 2016 2nd International Symposium on (pp. 40–44). IEEE.Google Scholar
  27. 27. Mahmoud, M. A., & Ahmad, M. S. (2015, August). A self-adaptive customer–oriented framework for intelligent strategic marketing: A multi-agent system approach to website development for learning institutions. In Agents, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR), 2015 International Symposium on (pp. 1–5). IEEE.Google Scholar
  28. 28. Moamin, M. A. H. M. O. U. D., Sharifuddin, A. M., & Zaliman, M. Y. M. (2016). Development and implementation of a technique for norms-adaptable agents in open multi-agent communities. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 29(6), 1519–1537.Google Scholar
  29. 29. Mahmoud, M. A., Ahmad, M. S., & Yusoff, M. Z. M. (2016, March). A Norm Assimilation Approach for Multi-agent Systems in Heterogeneous Communities. In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems (pp. 354–363). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  30. 30. Mahmoud, M. A., Mustapha, A., Ahmad, M. S., Ahmad, A., Yusoff, M. Z. M., & Hamid, N. H. A. (2013). Potential norms detection in social agent societies. In Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 419–428). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. 31. Kravari, K., & Bassiliades, N. (2015). A survey of agent platforms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(1), 11.Google Scholar
  32. 32. Biddle, S., & Goudas, M. (1997). Effort is virtuous: Teacher preferences of pupil effort, ability and grading in physical education. Educational Research, 39(3), 350–355.Google Scholar
  33. 33. Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R. A., & Mahbob, M. H. (2012). Student’s Participation in Classroom: What Motivates them to Speak up?. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 516–522.Google Scholar
  34. 34. Kamarudin, N., Halim, L., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2009). Pengurusan penglibatan pelajar dalam amali sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 34(1), 205–217.Google Scholar
  35. 35. Pace, C. R. (1990). The Undergraduates: A Report of Their Activities and Progress in College in the 1980’s.Google Scholar
  36. 36. Stuchlíková, I., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Janík, T. (2013). Emotional Aspects of Learning and Teaching: Reviewing the Field− Discussing the Issues. Orbis scholae, (2), 7–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Latha Subramainan
    • 1
  • Moamin A Mahmoud
    • 1
  • Mohd Sharifuddin Ahmad
    • 1
  • Mohd Zaliman Mohd Yusoff
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Computer Science and Information TechnologyUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.Business Development Unit, TNB Integrated Learning Solution Sdn BhdKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations