Skip to main content

A Multicriteria Group Decision Model for Ranking Technology Packages in Agriculture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Computing for Sustainability Science

Abstract

The problem of ranking a set of technology packages that are best suited for growing crops, is developed with a multicriteria group decision model. The group decision model is based on ELECTRE GD, a group decision method for multicriteria ranking problems, strongly based on ELECTRE III, developed to work on those cases where there is great divergence among the decision-makers. We use a practical case study to show our approach, where a group of decision-makers evaluates among the available technology packages to an agricultural company, in order to select the most appropriate alternative. The proposed model generates an agreed collective solution that aids those decision-makers with different interests, to reach (through an iterative process) an agreement on how to rank the technology packages. The proposed procedure is also based on a preference disaggregation approach for reaching agreement between individuals. To support the proposal of a temporary collective solution, individual inter-criteria parameters are inferred concerning individual and global preference for outranking methods in a feedback process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The system SADGAGE is hosted at http://mcdss.udo.mx/sadgage.

References

  1. Ahumada, O., Villalobos, J.R.: Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: a review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196(1), 1–20 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldana, U., Foltz, J.D., Barham, B.L., Useche, P.: Sequential adoption of package technologies: the dynamics of stacked trait corn adoption. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93(1), 130–143 (2011). doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Álvarez Carrillo, P.A., Leyva López, J.C., Sánchez Castañeda, MdlD: An empirical study of the consequences of coordination modes on supporting multicriteria group decision aid methodologies. J. Decis. Syst. 24(4), 383–405 (2015). doi:10.1080/12460125.2015.1080583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez, P.A., Morais, D.C., Leyva, J.C., de Almeida, A.T.: A Multi-objective genetic algorithm for inferring inter-criteria parameters for water supply consensus. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., et al. (ed.) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, vol. Springer-Verlag’s Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) series, pp. 218–233. EMO 2015, Part II, LNCS 9019, Guimarães, Portugal (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byerlee, D., de Polanco, E.H.: Farmers’ stepwise adoption of technological packages: evidence from the Mexican Altiplano. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68(3), 519 (1986). doi:10.2307/1241537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 97(1), 33–48 (1998). doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00339-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chiclana, F., Mata, F., Martinez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S.: Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus model. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 16(1), 35–53 (2008). doi:10.1142/s0218488508005236

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Feder, G., Just, R.E., Zilberman, D.: Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ. Dev. Cult. Chang. 33(2), 255–298 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Feder, G., Umali, D.L.: The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 43(3), 215–239 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modeling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Grose, T.K.: The next green revolution. ASEE Prism 25(4), 28–31 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Hum. 32(3), 394–402 (2002). doi:10.1109/tsmca.2002.802821

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacquet-Lagrèze, E., Siskos, Y.: Méthodes de Décision Multicritère. Editions Hommes et Techniques, Paris (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Jelassi, T., Kersten, G., Zionts, S.: An Introduction to Group Decision and Negotiation Support. 537-568 (1990). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_23

  15. Kacprzyk, J., Zadrożny, S.: Supporting consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences and a fuzzy majority via linguistic summaries. Preferences and Decisions. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pp. 261–279. Springer, Berlin (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15976-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan, M.S., Quaddus, M.: Group decision support using fuzzy cognitive maps for causal reasoning. Group Decis. Negot. 13(5), 463–480 (2004). doi:10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045748.89201.f3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leathers, H.D., Smale, M.: A Bayesian approach to explaining sequential adoption of components of a technological package. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73(3), 734 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leyva López, J.C., Álvarez Carrillo, P.A., Gastélum Chavira, D.A., Solano Noriega, J.J.: A web-based group decision support system for multicriteria ranking problems. Int. J. Oper. Res. 1–36. doi:10.1007/s12351-016-0234-0

  19. Leyva López, J.C., Alvarez Carrillo, P.A.: Accentuating the rank positions in an agreement index with reference to a consensus order. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22(6), 969–995 (2015). doi:10.1111/itor.12146

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Leyva, J.C., Aguilera, M.A.: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for deriving final ranking from a fuzzy outranking relation. In: Coello Coello, C.A., Zitzler, E., Hernández Aguirre, A. (eds.) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Third International Conference, EMO 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3410, pp. 235–249. Springer, México (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leyva, J.C., Fernández, E.: A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 148(1), 14–27 (2003). doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00273-4

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Macharis, C., Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B.: The GDSS PROMETHEE procedure - a PROMETHEE-GAIA based procedure for group decision support. J. Decis. Syst. 7, 283–307 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mareschal, B., De Smet, Y., Nemery, P.: Rank reversal in the PROMETHEE II method: some new results. 959–963 (2008). doi:10.1109/ieem.2008.4738012

  24. Munier, N.: A Strategy for Using Multicriteria Analysis in Decision-Making. Springer, Netherlands (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Palomares, I., Estrella, F.J., Martínez, L., Herrera, F.: Consensus under a fuzzy context: taxonomy, analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study. Inf. Fusion 20, 252–271 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2014.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Parreiras, R.O., Ekel, P.Y., Morais, D.C.: Fuzzy set based consensus schemes for multicriteria group decision making applied to strategic planning. Group Decis. Negot. 21(2), 153–183 (2011). doi:10.1007/s10726-011-9231-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rana, A.R., Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R.: Task and Technology Interaction (TTI): a theory of technological support for group tasks. In: Proceedings of The Thirtieth Annual Hawwaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 66–75. HI: IEEE Computer Society Press, Maui (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roy, B.: Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Scandizzo, P.L., Savastano, S.: The adoption and diffusion of GM crops in United States: a real option approach. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Anselmo Álvarez Carrillo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

López, J.C., Carrillo, P.A., Valenzuela, O.A. (2018). A Multicriteria Group Decision Model for Ranking Technology Packages in Agriculture. In: Cruz Corona, C. (eds) Soft Computing for Sustainability Science. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 358. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62359-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62359-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62358-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62359-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics