Skip to main content

Beyond Party Government? Technocratic Trends in Society and in the Executive

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies

Abstract

This book proposes to analyse, in a sample of European countries, the weight of technocracy in governments with the ambition of providing, in the first place, an accurate mapping of the phenomenon and, secondly, to explore some of the potential explanatory factors of its growing presence in Political Leadership. Our study concentrates its attention on Europe for three main reasons: First, this is the region of the world where party government has found its fullest development, but also where the party systems generated by the recent waves of democratization have been considered as substantially weaker. Secondly, Europe is the region where the parliamentary form of government is the most diffuse, but also where, in recent times, semi-presidential forms of governments have proliferated. Thirdly, Europe has seen with the EU, the development of a particularly strong form of multi-level governance. There are thus good reasons for an in-depth exploration of cabinet recruiting patterns in this area of the world.

In the introductory chapter, we will provide a more systematic overview of the existing literature, before, in the final section, describing our research strategy, the selection of cases and the operationalization of the variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akin, W. E. (1977). Technocracy and the American Dream: The Technocrat Movement, 1900–1941. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Bureaucrats or Politicians? Part II: Multiple Policy Tasks. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 426–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, D. (2016). Ideologues, Partisans, and Loyalists: Ministers and Policymaking in Parliamentary Cabinets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiadou, D., & Gunaydin, H. (2015). Selecting the Right Minister: The Appointments and Policy Effects of Technocrat and Expert Ministers. Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual European Political Science Association Conference, June, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allum, P. A. (1995). State and Society in Western Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amorim Neto, O., & Samuels, D. (2010). Democratic Regimes and Cabinet Politics: A Global Perspective. RIEC–Revista Ibero Americana de Estudos Legislativos, 1, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorim Neto, O., & Strøm, K. (2006). Breaking the Parliamentary Chain of Delegation: Presidents and Nonpartisan Cabinet Members in European Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 36, 619–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäck, H., Dumont, P., Meier, H. E., Persson, T., & Vernby, K. (2009). Does European Integration Lead to a Presidentialization of Executive Politics? Ministerial Selection in Swedish Post-war Cabinets. European Union Politics, 10, 226–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baturo, A. (2016). Cursus Honorum: Personal Background. Career and Experience of Political Leaders in Democracy and Dictatorship – New Data and Analyses. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, L. (2006). The Competent Cabinet? Ministers in Sweden and the Problem of Competence and Democracy. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29, 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertsou, E., & Pastorella, G. (2015). Technocracy: A Citizens’ Perspective. Paper presented at the ECPR Annual Conference, August, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (2000). Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848–2000. Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (1996). Party and Government: An Inquiry into the Relationship Between Governments and Supporting Parties in Liberal Democracies. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., & Cotta, M. (Eds.). (2000). The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., & Müller-Rommel, F. (Eds.). (1993). Governing Together: The Extent and Limits of Joint Decision-Making in Western European Cabinets. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., Muller-Rommel, F., & Malová, D. (Eds.). (2007). Governing New European Democracies. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J., & Thiébault, J.-L. (Eds.). (1991). The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borchert, J., & Zeiss, J. (2003). The Political Class in Advanced Democracies: A Comparative Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brunclik, M. (2015). The Rise of Technocratic Cabinets What We Know, and What We Should Like to Know. OZP – Austrian Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calise, M., & Mannheimer, R. (1982). Governanti in Italia: un trentennio repubblicano, 1946–1976. Bologna: il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, M. A., & Silva, P. (Eds.). (1998). The Politics of Expertise in Latin America. New York: St Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1851–1854). Système de politique positive ou Traité de sociologie instituant la religion de l’Humanité. Paris: Carilian-Gœury et V. Dalmont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, M. (1991). Conclusion: From the Simple World of Party Government to a More Complex View of Party-Government Relationships. In J. Blondel & J.-L. Thiébault (Eds.), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe (pp. 174–198). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cotta, M., & Best, H. (2007). Democratic Representation in Europe: Diversity, Change, and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J., & Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dargent, E. (2015). Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America. The Expert Running Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter, L. (1991). Parliamentary and Party Pathways to the Cabinet. In J. Blondel & J.-L. Thiébault (Eds.), The Profession of Government Minister in Western Europe (pp. 44–69). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M. (1979). How to Become a Cabinet Minister in France: Career Pathways, 1870–1978. Comparative Politics, 12, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DonVito, P. A. (1969). The Essentials of a Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (No. RAND-P-4124). Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K. (2013). The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 617–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, P., Fiers, S., & Dandoy, R. (2009). Belgium: Ups and Downs of Ministerial Careers in a Partitocratic Federal State. In K. Dowding & P. Dumont (Eds.), The Selection of Ministers in Europe: Hiring and Firing (pp. 124–146). London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1980). A New Political System Model: Semi-presidential Government. European Journal of Political Research, 8, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgie, R. (1999). Semi-presidentialism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elgie, R. (2011). Semi-presidentialism: Sub-types and Democratic Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Engelen, E., Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., et al. (2012). Misrule of Experts? The Financial Crisis as Elite Debacle. Economy and Society, 41(3), 360–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fisichella, D. (1965). Il potere nella società industriale. Saint Simon e Comte. Napoli: Morano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, J., & Seyfried, M. (2015). Drawing from the Bargaining Pool: Determinants of Ministerial Selection in Germany. Party Politics, 21, 503–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. (1993). The Rise of the British Presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourquet, F. (1980). Les comptes de la puissance, Histoire de la comptabilité nationale et du Plan. Paris: Éditions Recherches.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Headey, B. (1974). British Cabinet Ministers: The Roles of Politicians in Executive Office. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, L. (1996). Executive Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies: The British Prime Minister and the German Chancellor Compared. German Politics, 5(1), 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helms, L. (2005). The Presidentialisation of Political Leadership: British Notions and German Observations. The Political Quarterly, 76, 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hira, A. (2007). Should Economists Rule the World? Trends and Implications of Leadership Patterns in the Developing World, 1960–2005. International Political Science Review, 28, 325–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, K., & Raunio, T. (2010). Organizing the Core Executive for European Union Affairs: Comparing Finland and Sweden. Public Administration, 88, 649–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, K. M., & Tallberg, J. (2010). Explaining Chief Executive Empowerment: EU Summitry and Domestic Institutional Change. West European Politics, 33, 208–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, A., & Fischer, J. (2009). Linkages Between Parliamentary and Ministerial Careers in Germany, 1949–2008: The Bundestag as Recruitment Pool. German Politics, 18(2), 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. B. (2016). Partisan Technocratic Cycles in Latin America. Paper prepared for the conference Fat Politics, Lean Politics: Political Survival in Good and Bad Times, Texas A&M University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. S. (1986). Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception. In F. Castles & R. Wildnemann (Eds.), Visions and Realities of Party Government (pp. 31–71). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1981). The Rise of the Career Politician in Britain – And Its Consequences. British Journal of Political Science, 11, 249–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. (2012). Party Transformations in European Democracies. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J. J., & Shain, I. (1994). Between States: Interim Governments in Democratic Transitions. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe. West European Politics, 17, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margairaz, M. (Ed.). (1989). Pierre Mendès France et l’économie: pensée et action. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Gallardo, C., & Schleiter, P. (2015). Choosing Whom to Trust: Agency Risks and Cabinet Partisanship in Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 48(2), 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I. (2007). The Personalization of Politics. In R. J. Dalton & H.-D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior (pp. 571–588). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and Classifying and Technocratic-Led and Technocratic Governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 654–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, L. K. (2000). Measuring Presidential Power. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 660–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynaud, J. (1964). La technocratie. Mythe ou réalité. Paris: Les Éditions Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynaud, J. (Ed.). (1967). Les pouvoirs de décision dans l’État moderne. Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakulski, J., & Tranter, B. (2015). The Decline of Political Leadership in Australia? Changing Recruitment and Careers of Federal Politicians. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastorella, G. (2015). Technocratic Governments in Europe. Getting the Critique Right. Political Studies, online version, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrazzani, A. (2017). Fare le leggi nella Seconda Repubblica. Milano: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2004). Depoliticizing Democracy. Ratio Juris, 17(1), 52–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, A. C., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2009). Portugal: The Primacy of “Independents”. In K. Dowding & P. Dumont (Eds.), The Selection of Ministers in Europe. Hiring and Firing (pp. 147–158). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (Eds.). (2005). The Presidentialization of Politics: a comparative study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O. (2005a). Politics of Intra-executive Conflict in Semi-presidential Regimes in Eastern Europe. Eastern European Politics and Societies, 19, 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O. (2005b). Prime Ministers’ Identity in Semi-presidential Regimes: Constitutional Norms and Cabinet Formation Outcomes. European Journal of Political Research, 44, 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O. (2006). Intra-executive Competition Between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of Institutional Conflict and Co-operation Under semi-presidentialism. Political Studies, 54, 219–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protsyk, O. (2011). Semi-presidentialism Under Post-communism. In R. Elgie, S. Moestrup, & Y.-S. Wu (Eds.), Semi-presidentialism and Democracy (pp. 98–116). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1977). Elite Transformation in Advanced Industrial Societies: An Empirical Assessment of the Theory of Technocracy. Comparative Political Studies, 10, 383–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Teruel, J. (2010). Gobierno parlamentario sin ministros parlamentarios? La influencia de la descentralización en las carreras de la elite ministerial española. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 24, 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). La Légitimité démocratique. Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Simon, C.-H. (1821). Du système industriel. Paris: Renourad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2017). From a Deficit of Democracy to a Technocratic Order: The Postcrisis Debate on Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 351–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schick, A. (1966). Planning-Programming-Budgeting System: A Symposium. Public Administration Review, 26, 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleiter, P., & Morgan-Jones, E. (2009). Constitutional Power and Competing Risks: Monarchs, Presidents, Prime Ministers, and the Termination of East and West European Cabinets. American Political Science Review, 103, 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedelius, T., & Mashtaler, O. (2013). Two Decades of Semi-presidentialism: Issues of Intra-executive Conflict in Central and Easter Europe 1991–2011. East European Politics, 29, 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, M., & Carey, J. M. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siaroff, A. (2003). Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-presidential and Parliamentary Distinction. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P. (2009). In the Name of Reason: Technocrats and Politics in Chile. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (2000a). Parties at the Core of Government. In R. Dalton & M. P. Warrenberg (Eds.), Making and Breaking Governments (pp. 180–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (2000b). ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 261–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares de Almeida, P., Pinto, A. C., & Bermeo, N. (Eds.). (2003). Who Governs Southern Europe. Regime Change and Ministerial Recruitment. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, Going, … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1921). The Engineers and the Price System. New York: B. W. Huebsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P., & Poguntke, T. (2013). The Presidentialisation of Politics Thesis Defended. Parliamentary Affairs, 66, 646–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. F. (2011). Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership Across the Democratic World. Party Politics, 17, 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. E. (2006). Escaping the Zero-Sum Scenario: Democracy Versus Technocracy in Latin America. Political Science Quarterly, 121, 119–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H., & Budge, I. (2000). Party Government in 48 Democracies (1945–1998): Composition, Duration, Personnel. Dordrecht; Boston; London: Kluver Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, B., & Bennister, M. (2011). Putting Goats Amongst the Wolves: Appointing Ministers from Outside Parliament in the UK. Paper presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong, B., & Hazel, R. (2011). Putting Goats Amongst the Wolves: Appointing Ministers from Outside the Parliament. London: The Constitution Unit, UCL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Costa Pinto, A., Cotta, M., Tavares de Almeida, P. (2018). Beyond Party Government? Technocratic Trends in Society and in the Executive. In: Costa Pinto, A., Cotta, M., Tavares de Almeida, P. (eds) Technocratic Ministers and Political Leadership in European Democracies. Palgrave Studies in Political Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62313-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics