Skip to main content

We, Us, Ourselves and Our Others

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 239 Accesses

Abstract

Ethnographic vignettes, such as a humorous discussion by liberal intellectuals on the Soviet intelligentsia’s methods of writing history, or on the “ridiculous” exaggerations of national myths, lead the analysis in this chapter to demonstrate how the past is employed as a rhetorical strategy in certain speech acts and how through their hidden addressivity such acts of speaking mark off one form of “cultural mentality” from another. Rhetorical practices of marking-off bring alternative national publics into being, distinctly voiced through national myths of selfhood. This chapter adopts certain points on “publics and counterpublics” from Michael Warner’s work and employs it in the critical revision of the concept of “imagining” to argue that it is imagining in terms of internal fragmentation that is inherent to the sense of belonging to a national community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lake Bazaleti is located some 60 kilometers northwest of Tbilisi, with a surrounding recreation area and a village (with the same name).

  2. 2.

    “Georgianness” (in Georgian, kartveloba) is a term in common use that would be simply translated as Georgian identity, but while identity is a neutral term, Georgianness is a value-charged word that functions as a condensed symbol representing some essentialist notions of the character of the Georgian people.

  3. 3.

    “Bendukidze’s reforms,” as Georgians refer to it, resulted in the Georgian state budget’s increasing from approximately $US400 million to $US4.5 billion.

  4. 4.

    The legislation was amended in 2010 and has since been inactive as per Georgian Legal Act N2911 (information obtained from the official webpage of Georgian codex: www.codexserver.com).

  5. 5.

    While I refer to Kakha Bendukidze and few other individuals who appear in this study by their full name, I prefer to use only first names (or pseudonyms where stated) with respect to others, even in cases where I have been granted permission to use their real and/or full names.

  6. 6.

    Colchis is the first proto-Georgian state on the eastern coast of the Black Sea established in the Middle Bronze Age (see Suny 1994; Rayfield 2012).

  7. 7.

    “Mother History” (in Georgian, deda-istoria) is the title of a historical novel by Levan Sanikidze that portrays the history of Georgia from ancient times till the twentieth century, through the adventures of Georgians’ heroism and self-sacrifice, first published in late 1986. But “mother history” is a term of common use that, on the one hand, signifies a particular vision of Georgia’s past, and on the other, expresses the notion that Georgia’s past (as portrayed in Sanikidze’s novel) is a birth-giver (hence a mother) of the Georgian nation. However, this group deploys the term as a way to satirize this particular vision of the past as an expression of “exaggerated Georgianness” (see more on this in Chap. 5).

  8. 8.

    The person in question was the head of the committee in the parliament of Georgia. I prefer to conceal the real name of the person and specific details of his position for ethical reasons.

  9. 9.

    Abkhazia is a secessionist republic on the eastern coast of the Black Sea, recognized first by Russia and a few other states as an autonomous republic. The conflict between Abkhazia and Georgia errupted in the early 1990s, and to this day it remains a disputed territory.

  10. 10.

    The Georgian word he uses is “bedukughmartoba,” literally the backwardness of fate.

  11. 11.

    For a tremendously insightful examination of the role of shame in mediating sense of national belonging, see Khalvashi (2015).

  12. 12.

    Taking Renan’s quote further, Mitchell Reyes, in his insightful essay on memory and alterity, argues that “The things people have in common comprise the space of intersubjectivity, and intersubjective figures as the condition for the possibility of collective identity.”

  13. 13.

    Patriarch Ilia II, “Epistles, Speeches, Preachings,” Volume 1, Tbilisi 1997.

  14. 14.

    See See www.orthodoxy.ge

  15. 15.

    I have found references to the Georgian Church as a “Trojan horse” in several forums: during informal conversations, but mostly in my discussions with liberal intellectuals as well as historians of the older generation. The right-wing liberal magazine Tabula featured a column, “The Law of Russian-Georgian Eternity” (qartul rusuli maradisobis kanoni) that outlined the long history of relations between the Russian and Georgian churches in a section “Trojan Horse,” which included the following quote: “…in reality, this naive hope in a common faith (ertmortsmuneoba in Georgian literally is common faith-ness) played the role of a real Trojan horse in the preparation for [Georgia’s] occupation and annexation” (February 22, 2013).

  16. 16.

    Information obtained from Georgian Ministry of Culture in 2011.

  17. 17.

    Full transcription (in English) on www.civil.ge

References

  • Anderson, B.O.R. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, R.D. 2010. A Little War that Shook the World : Georgia, Russia, and the Future of the West. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: Texas University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. 2002. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaonkar, D.P. 1999. On Alternative Modernities. Public Culture 11 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1215/08992363-11-1-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garagozov, R. 2008. Characteristics of Collective Memory, Ethnic Conflicts, Historiography, and the “Politics of Memory”: Characteristics of Historical Accounts and “Forms” of Collective Memory. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 46 (2): 58–95. doi:10.2753/rpo1061-0405460202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. Gedisa. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

  • Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, B., and L. Yalçın-Heckmann. 2007. Caucasus Paradigms: Anthropologies, Histories and the Making of a World Area. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzfeld, M. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. 2005. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobswam, E. 1983. Introduction: Inventing Traditions. The Invention of Tradition: 1–14. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107295636.001.

  • Holquist, M., and C. Emerson. 1981. Glossary. In Dialogic Imaginaiton: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, ed. M. Holquist and C. Emerson. Austin: Texas University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, S.A. 2005. From Ethnic Conflict to Stillborn Reform: The Former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jgerenaia, E. 2012. rat’om ar vart shveitsaria. Tabula, (105).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S.F. 2006. The Rose Revolution: A Revolution Without Revolutionaries? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19 (1): 33–48. doi:10.1080/09557570500501754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, B. 1998. Legends of People, Myths of State : Violence, Intolerance, and Political Culture in Sri Lanka and Australia. Bathurst: Crawford House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalvashi, T. 2015. Peripheral Affects: Shame, Publics and Performance on the Margins of the Republic of Georgia. PhD Dissertation, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalvashi, T., and Batiashvili, N. 2009. Can a Muslim Be Georgian. In International Conference on Central Eurasian Studies: Past, Present and Future. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/9955101/2009_March_Can_a_Muslim_be_Georgian_Co-Author_of_paper_with_Tamta_Khalvashi_presented_by_Tamta_Khalvashi_on_the_International_Conference_on_Central_Eurasian_Studies_Past_Present_and_Future_

  • Light, M. 2010. The Russo-Georgian War of 2008: A Conflict Announced in Advance? Europe-Asia Studies 62 (9): 1579–1582. doi:10.1080/09668136.2010.515799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, P. 2007. Rose-Colored Glasses? Color Revolutions and Cartoon Chaos in Postsocialist Georgia. Cultural Anthropology 22 (2): 171–213. doi:10.1525/can.2007.22.2.171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L.A. 2006. Democracy in Georgia Since the Rose Revolution. Orbis 50 (4): 669–676. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2006.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mits’ishvili, N. 1926. pikrebi sakartveloze (Speculations about Georgia). Kartuli Mts’erloba (Georgian Literature), September-, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mits’ishvili, I. 2006. Quo vadis, saqartvelov?! (Quo vadis, Georgia). In Pikrebi sakartveloze (Speculations about Georgia) (pp. 5–6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, M. 2006. Defending the Border : Identity, Religion, and Modernity in the Republic of Georgia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, Ngai. 2000. Other Modernities: Gendered Yearnings in China After Socialism. Pacific Affairs 73 (1): 111–112. doi:10.1353/cri.2001.0078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayfield, D. 2012. Edge of Empires: A History of Georgia. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, E. 1990. What Is a Nation?, 8–22. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers Brubaker. (2005). Concepts in Question. Ed. F. Cooper, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.H. 2006. Multiple Modernities or Varieties of Modernity? Current Sociology 54 (1): 77–97. doi:10.1177/0011392106058835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shnirelman, V. 1995. The Past as a Strategy for Ethnic Confrontation. Helsinki Citizens Assembly Quarterly 14: 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. National Identity and Myths of Ethnogenesis in Transcaucasia. In Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities, ed. G. Smith, V. Law, A. Wilson, A. Bohr, and E. Allworth, 48–67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suny, R.G. 1993. The Revenge of the Past: Nationalism, Revolution, and the Collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Making of the Georgian Nation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Constructing Primordialism: Old Histories for New Nations. The Journal of Modern History 73 (4): 862–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toal, G. 2012. The Guns of August 2008. Russia’s War in Georgia. Nationalities Papers 40 (5): 826–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushakin, S. 2009. The Patriotism of Despair: Nation, War, and Loss in Russia. Cornell University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7z6nz

  • Verdery, K. 1999. The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voloshinov, V.N. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. In Studies in Language, ed. L. Matejka and I.R. Titunik, Vol. i. New York/London: Seminar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waal, T. 2011. Georgia’s Choices: Charting a Future in Uncertain Times. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture 14 (1): 49–90. doi:10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Way, L. 2008. The Real Causes of the Color Revolutions. Journal of Democracy 19 (3): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, J. 2005. Georgia from National Awakening to Rose Revolution: Delayed Transition in the Former Soviet Union. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurchak, A. 2003. Soviet Hegemony of Form: Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45 (3): 480–510. doi:10.1017/S0010417503000239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. 2003. Time Maps : Collective Memory and the Social Shape of the Past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Batiashvili, N. (2018). We, Us, Ourselves and Our Others. In: The Bivocal Nation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62286-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62286-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62285-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62286-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics