Skip to main content

Inguinal Lymphadenectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Conventional open inguinal lymphadenectomy is the gold standard for high-risk penile cancer patients. However, large series of this type of surgery reported a high morbidity (at least 50%), especially regarding the skin and lymphatic events.

Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy is a minimally invasive procedure that reduces dramatically the skin complications, leading to a less morbid procedure.

In this chapter, we revised the pertinent literature, presented our 10 years’ experience and described some tips and tricks to achieve better results and reduce the associated procedure complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, de Moraes JR. Analyses of 200 lymphadenectomies in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol. 1991;146:330–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravi R. Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol. 1993;72(6):941–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. EAU. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: The role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int. 2001;88:473–83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA. Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M.D. Anderson cancer center experience. J Urol. 2002;167(4):1638–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, Chang SS. Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a contemporary series. J Urol. 2004;172(2):494–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, Hetet JF, Karam G. Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2004;45(6):761–5. discussion 765–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey D, Mahajan V, Kannan RR. Prognostic factors in node-positive carcinoma of the penis. J Surg Oncol. 2006;93(2):133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pompeo AC, Mesquita JL, Junior WA. Staged inguinal lymphadenectomy (SIL) for carcinoma of the penis (CP). A 13 years prospective study of 50 patients. J Urol. 1995;153:246A. Abstract 72.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koifman L, Hampl D, Koifman N, Vides AJ, Ornellas AA. Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes. J Urol. 2013;190(6):2086–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson DE, Lo RK. Complications of groin dissection in penile cancer. Experience with 101 lymphadenectomies. Urology. 1984;24:312–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parra RO. Accurate staging of carcinoma of the penis in men with nonpal-pable inguinal lymph nodes by modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol. 1996;155:560–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. d’Ancona CA, de Lucena RG, Querne FA, et al. Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol. 2004;172:498–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Coblentz TR, Theodorescu D. Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol. 2002;168:1386–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Silva MN, Molina WR Jr, Forseto PH, Juliano RV, et al. Can video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy achieve a lower morbidity than open lymph node dissection in penile cancer patients? J Endourol. 2008;22:1687–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sotelo R, Sánchez-Salas R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Mariano M, Neiva G, et al. Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma. J Endourol. 2007;21(4):364–7. discussion 367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Master V, Ogan K, Kooby D, Hsiao W, Delman K. LEG endoscopic groin lymphadenectomy (LEG procedure): step-by-step approach to a straightforward technique. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):821–8. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Jul 15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Romanelli P, Nishimoto R, Suarez R, Decia R, Abreu D. Machado: video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: surgical and oncological results. Actas Urol Esp. 2013;37(5):305–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien P, Sanabria J, Strasberg S. Proposed classification of complication of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Master VA, Jafri SM, Moses KA, Ogan K, Kooby DA, Delman KA. Minimally invasive inguinal lymphadenectomy via endoscopic groin dissection: comprehensive assessment of immediate and long-term complications. J Urol. 2012;188(4):1176–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carlos AS, Romanelli P, Nishimoto R, Montoya LM, Juliano CA, Costa RM Jr, Pompeo AC, Tobias-Machado M. Expanded criteria for video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in penile cancer: palpable lymph nodes. Int Braz J Urol. 2013;39(6):893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Josephson DY, et al. Robotic-assisted endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy. Urology. 2009;73(1):167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Angemeier KW, Sotelo R, Sharp DS. In: Campebell-Walsh urology. 11th ed. Elsevier, Chapter 39, Part IV; 2016. pp. 890–906.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcos Tobias-Machado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tobias-Machado, M., Moschovas, M.C. (2018). Inguinal Lymphadenectomy. In: Sotelo, R., Arriaga, J., Aron, M. (eds) Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62276-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62277-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics