Advertisement

Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Complications

  • René J. Sotelo
  • Raed A. Azhar
  • Oscar D. Martín
Chapter

Abstract

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy has increased significantly in popularity in recent years as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Compared to conventional techniques, the robotic-assisted technique allows greater tissue resection with less blood loss and shorter recovery time. However, urologists must be aware of the potential complications before, during, and after surgery, including vascular injury, infection, urinary complications, intestinal injuries, cardiovascular or thromboembolic events, and sexual dysfunction. Here we describe the prevention, risk factors, identification, and treatment of these complications.

Keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia Prostatectomy Robotic DaVinci Surgical complications prostate Adenoma Simple prostatectomy Robotic surgery Intrafascial simple prostatectomy Complications 

References

  1. 1.
    Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, et al. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1099–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asimakopoulos AD, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, Spera E, Vespasiani G, Gaston R, et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach–a systematic review. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2012;26(8):960–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Rocco B, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012;109(3):426–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Castillo O, Vidal-Mora I, Rodriguez-Carlin A, Silva A, Schatloff O. Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results. Prostate Int. 2016;4(2):61–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clavijo R, Carmona O, De Andrade R, Garza R, Fernandez G, Sotelo R. Robot-assisted intrafascial simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2013;27(3):328–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin Garzon OD, Azhar RA, Brunacci L, Ramirez-Troche NE, Medina Navarro L, Hernandez LC, et al. One-year outcome comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and robotic intrafascial simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2016;30(3):312–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs–the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, Sanchez-Salas R, Sotelo RJ, Chlosta PL, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):86–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33(4):563–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2011;25(4):641–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter A, Eun D, Peabody JO, Mohler JL, et al. Robot-assisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4101–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Banda E, Miranda M, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2):513–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr JL. Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy. Urology. 2009;73(4):811–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uffort EE, Jensen JC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: an alternative minimal invasive approach for prostate adenoma. J Robot Surg. 2010;4(1):7–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Spinelli M, Musi G, Melegari S, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):E972–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vora A, Mittal S, Hwang J, Bandi G. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100 grams. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2012;26(5):499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nething JB, Ricchiuti DJ, Irvine R, Drevna D. Robotic simple prostatectomy: a consideration for large prostate adenomas. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia: organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica/Associazione ricerche in urologia. 2014;86(4):241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Banapour P, Patel N, Kane CJ, Cohen SA, Parsons JK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and report of a single institution case series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17(1):1–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leslie S, Abreu AL, Chopra S, Ramos P, Park D, Berger AK, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):321–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elsamra SE, Gupta N, Ahmed H, Leavitt D, Kreshover J, Kavoussi L, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomy – The Smith Institute for Urology experience with an evolving technique. Asian J Urol. 2014;1(1):55–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoy NY, Van Zyl S, St Martin BA. Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: case series and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J (Journal de l’Association des urologues du Canada). 2015;9(9–10):E626–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pokorny M, Novara G, Geurts N, Dovey Z, De Groote R, Ploumidis A, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):451–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1419–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol. 1995;154(2 Pt 1):479–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Tebala GD, Vellone M, Cavicchioni C. Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(1):58–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):634–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dunne N, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):22–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Makai G, Isaacson K. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(3):401–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sergi F, Falavolti C, Bove AM, Luperto E, Altobelli E, Buscarini M. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy with clamping of bilateral hypogastric arteries. J Robot Surg. 2013;7(3):309–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2004;91(10):1253–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuunemann HJ, American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic T, et al. Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):7S–47S.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, Protogerou V, Deliveliotis C. Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology. 2004;64(2):306–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • René J. Sotelo
    • 1
  • Raed A. Azhar
    • 2
    • 3
  • Oscar D. Martín
    • 4
  1. 1.USC Institute of Urology, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Urology DepartmentKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia- Facultad de Medicina. Servicio Urología-Clínica Cooperativa de ColombiaVillavicencioColombia

Personalised recommendations