Skip to main content

Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Complications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy has increased significantly in popularity in recent years as a treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Compared to conventional techniques, the robotic-assisted technique allows greater tissue resection with less blood loss and shorter recovery time. However, urologists must be aware of the potential complications before, during, and after surgery, including vascular injury, infection, urinary complications, intestinal injuries, cardiovascular or thromboembolic events, and sexual dysfunction. Here we describe the prevention, risk factors, identification, and treatment of these complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, et al. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1099–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asimakopoulos AD, Mugnier C, Hoepffner JL, Spera E, Vespasiani G, Gaston R, et al. The surgical treatment of a large prostatic adenoma: the laparoscopic approach–a systematic review. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2012;26(8):960–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Rocco B, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012;109(3):426–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Castillo O, Vidal-Mora I, Rodriguez-Carlin A, Silva A, Schatloff O. Modified urethrovesical anastomosis during robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: technique and results. Prostate Int. 2016;4(2):61–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):629–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clavijo R, Carmona O, De Andrade R, Garza R, Fernandez G, Sotelo R. Robot-assisted intrafascial simple prostatectomy: novel technique. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2013;27(3):328–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin Garzon OD, Azhar RA, Brunacci L, Ramirez-Troche NE, Medina Navarro L, Hernandez LC, et al. One-year outcome comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and robotic intrafascial simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2016;30(3):312–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs–the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano MB, Sanchez-Salas R, Sotelo RJ, Chlosta PL, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lucca I, Shariat SF, Hofbauer SL, Klatte T. Outcomes of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2015;33(4):563–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutherland DE, Perez DS, Weeks DC. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for severe benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2011;25(4):641–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yuh B, Laungani R, Perlmutter A, Eun D, Peabody JO, Mohler JL, et al. Robot-assisted Millin’s retropubic prostatectomy: case series. Can J Urol. 2008;15(3):4101–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, Garcia A, Banda E, Miranda M, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179(2):513–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. John H, Bucher C, Engel N, Fischer B, Fehr JL. Preperitoneal robotic prostate adenomectomy. Urology. 2009;73(4):811–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Uffort EE, Jensen JC. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: an alternative minimal invasive approach for prostate adenoma. J Robot Surg. 2010;4(1):7–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matei DV, Brescia A, Mazzoleni F, Spinelli M, Musi G, Melegari S, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP): does it make sense? BJU Int. 2012;110(11 Pt C):E972–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vora A, Mittal S, Hwang J, Bandi G. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy: multi-institutional outcomes for glands larger than 100 grams. J Endourol (Endourological Society). 2012;26(5):499–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nething JB, Ricchiuti DJ, Irvine R, Drevna D. Robotic simple prostatectomy: a consideration for large prostate adenomas. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia: organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica/Associazione ricerche in urologia. 2014;86(4):241–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Banapour P, Patel N, Kane CJ, Cohen SA, Parsons JK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: a systematic review and report of a single institution case series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leslie S, Abreu AL, Chopra S, Ramos P, Park D, Berger AK, et al. Transvesical robotic simple prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):321–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Elsamra SE, Gupta N, Ahmed H, Leavitt D, Kreshover J, Kavoussi L, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomy – The Smith Institute for Urology experience with an evolving technique. Asian J Urol. 2014;1(1):55–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoy NY, Van Zyl S, St Martin BA. Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: case series and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J (Journal de l’Association des urologues du Canada). 2015;9(9–10):E626–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pokorny M, Novara G, Geurts N, Dovey Z, De Groote R, Ploumidis A, et al. Robot-assisted simple prostatectomy for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement: surgical technique and outcomes in a high-volume robotic centre. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):451–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, Karl A, Hermanek P, Lack N, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2007;177(4):1419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV, Ehrlich R, Evans R, Fuchs G, et al. Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol. 1995;154(2 Pt 1):479–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Tebala GD, Vellone M, Cavicchioni C. Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(1):58–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):634–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dunne N, Booth MI, Dehn TC. Establishing pneumoperitoneum: Verres or Hasson? The debate continues. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93(1):22–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Makai G, Isaacson K. Complications of gynecologic laparoscopy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;52(3):401–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sergi F, Falavolti C, Bove AM, Luperto E, Altobelli E, Buscarini M. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy with clamping of bilateral hypogastric arteries. J Robot Surg. 2013;7(3):309–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van der Voort M, Heijnsdijk EA, Gouma DJ. Bowel injury as a complication of laparoscopy. Br J Surg. 2004;91(10):1253–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Guyatt GH, Akl EA, Crowther M, Gutterman DD, Schuunemann HJ, American College of Chest Physicians Antithrombotic T, et al. Executive summary: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):7S–47S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Varkarakis I, Kyriakakis Z, Delis A, Protogerou V, Deliveliotis C. Long-term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients. Urology. 2004;64(2):306–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to René J. Sotelo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sotelo, R.J., Azhar, R.A., Martín, O.D. (2018). Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy Complications. In: Sotelo, R., Arriaga, J., Aron, M. (eds) Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62276-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62277-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics