Advertisement

Ureteral Reconstruction Surgery

  • Jatin Gupta
  • Ronney Abaza
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to discuss complications associated with robotic ureteral reconstructive procedures. The chapter is outlined by first giving a general overview of common robotic ureteral reconstructive procedures performed, followed by literature review of the complications and an in-depth discussion of various complications and their management options.

Keywords

Ureteral reconstruction Complications Robotics Pyeloplasty Ureterolithotomy Reimplantation 

References

  1. 1.
    Hubert J, Wiklund P. Robotic urology. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hemal AK, Nayyar R, Gupta NP, Dorairajan LN. Experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery for upper and lower benign and malignant ureteral pathologies. Urology. 2010;76:1387–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sivaraman AA, Leveille RJ, Patel MB, Chauhan S, Bracho J, Moore C, Coelho R, Palmer K, Schatloff O, Bird V, Munver R, Patel VR. Robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. Urology. 2012;79:351–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gettman MT, Peschel R, Neururer R, Bartsch G. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the daVinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol. 2002;42:453–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tasian GE, Casale P. The robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: gateway to advanced reconstruction. Urol Clin North Am. 2015;42:89–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi N, Peters C, Stein R, Gettman M. Robot assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65:430–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int. 2005;95(Suppl 2):102–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sivaraman A, Leveillee RJ, Patel MB, Chauhan S, Bracho JE II, Moore CR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Schatloff O, Bird VG, Munver R, Patel VR. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. Urology. 2012;79(2):351–5. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopf HL, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2016;90:106–11. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS Jr, Leveillee RJ, Bird VG, Aziz M, Pautler SE, Luke P, Erdeljan P, Duane Baldwin D, Ebrahimi K, Nadler RB, Rebuck D, Thomas R, Lee BR, Boylu U, Figenshau RS, Munver R, Averch TD, Gayed B, Shalhav AL, Gundeti MS, Castle EP, Anderson JK, Duffey BG, Landman J, Okhunov Z, Wong C, Strom KH. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. The Journal of Urology. 2012;187(2):522–7. ISSN 0022-5347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chhabra J, Balaji S, Sudharsan B, Singh A, Mishra S, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Desai M. Robot assisted ureterocalicostomy: a single centre contempary experience. Arab J Urol. 2016;14:25–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osman T, Eltahawy I, Fawaz K, Shoeib M, Elshawaf H, El Halaby R. Ureterocalicostomy for treatment of complex cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology. 2011;78(1):202–7. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korets R, Hyams ES, Shah OD, Stifelman MD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy. Urology. 2007;70(2):366–9. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakada S. Chapter 49. Campbell Walsh urology, 11th ed.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abaza R. Techniques for laparoscopic and robotic localization of intraluminal ureteral pathology. Urology. 2009;73(3):582–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marien T, Bjurlin MA, Wynia B, Bilbily M, Rao G, Zhao LC, Shah O, Stifelman MD. Outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstruction: 250 consecutive patients. BJU Int. 2015;116:604–11. doi: 10.1111/bju.13086.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, Hurle R, Lazzeri M, Taverna G, Bozzini G, Bertolo R, Checcucci E, Porpiglia F, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Larcher A, Suardi N, Montorsi F, Lista G, Guazzoni G, Mottrie A. Robot-assisted surgery for benign ureteral strictures: experience and outcomes from four Tertiary Care Institutions. Eur Urol. Available online 26 July 2016. ISSN 0302-2838.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mufarrij P, Shah OD, Berger AD, Stifelman MD. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 2007;178:2002–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Humphreys MR. The emerging role of robotics and laparoscopy in stone disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;40(1):115–28. ISSN 0094-0143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W, Tupikowski K, Pupka A, Janczak D, Zdrojowy R. Clavien classification of complications after 150 laparoscopic pyeloplasties. Urology. 2011;77(6):1359–64. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maldonado PA, Slocum PD, Chin K, Corton MM. Anatomic relationships of psoas muscle: clinical applications to psoas hitch ureteral reimplantation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):563.e1–6. ISSN 0002-9378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kowalczyk JJ, Keating MA, Ehrlich RM. Femoral nerve neuropathy after the psoas hitch procedure. Urology. 1996;47(4):563–5. ISSN 0090-4295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotic Surgery, OhioHealth Dublin Methodist HospitalDublinUSA

Personalised recommendations