Skip to main content

Islam and Democracy: Perspectives from Reformist and Traditional Islam

Part of the Middle East Today book series (MIET)

Abstract

Justice, freedom, and democracy, all key aspirations to which Muslims in general aspire, are subscribed to by many Islamic movements, parties, and reformist religious scholars who see no contradiction between Islam and democracy. However, conservative Islamists insist that Islam and democracy are incompatible, and that the pursuit of a democratic society would not only conflict with Islamic teachings, but also passively succumb to the dictates of Western modernity. Leading Muslim thinkers have long debated the compatibility versus incompatibility of Islam and democracy. Analyses of these two divergent viewpoints might start by considering the following questions: Do the advocates and opponents of the compatibility of Islam and democracy abide by different interpretations of Islam? Do they share the same understanding of “democracy”? Given that these divergent perspectives are defendable when situated within their respective ideological parameters, it is important to clarify these parameters in conceptual terms. In this chapter, Mohsen Kadivar identifies the key differences between traditional interpretations and reformist readings of Islam. Whereas traditional interpretations are dominant mainly in clerical establishments and seminaries, reformist readings are generally promoted by religious intellectuals including clergy and lay thinkers who have received academic training. After explaining the identifying characteristics of these two opposing interpretations, this chapter then highlights three underlying themes that are essential to the relationship between Islam and democracy: (a) popular sovereignty and oversight; (b) political equality; and (c) public decision-making. The chapter explicates how traditionalist and reformist readings of Islamic teachings have resulted in sharply diverging articulations of these themes. In short, while the reformist theological articulation delineates the compatibility of Islam and democracy, the two remain fundamentally incompatible from a traditionalist perspective.

Keywords

  • Islamic Tradition
  • Kadivar
  • Political Equality
  • Islamic Education
  • Muslim

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62256-9_2
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-62256-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    As an example, see Qutb (2006).

  2. 2.

    Traditional religious scholars have not explicitly stated the characteristics of their interpretations. What follows is the result of the author’s familiarity with traditional Islamic thought.

  3. 3.

    I have dealt with this specific issue in detail in a separate article entitled ‘Human Rights and Religious Intellectualism’, see Kadivar (2009b).

  4. 4.

    The issue has been elaborated upon in ‘Freedom of Thought and Religion in Islam and Human Rights Documents’, see Kadivar (2006).

  5. 5.

    I have discussed this topic in detail in ‘From Historical to Spiritual Islam’, see Kadivar (2009a).

  6. 6.

    See Kadivar (2001b).

  7. 7.

    The idea of democracy as a contested concept can be found in: Beetham (1999) and Gallie (1956).

  8. 8.

    Regarding supervision see my article ‘Nezarat bar amalkard-e vali-ye faqih’, Kadivar (2001a).

  9. 9.

    Regarding propagation for the good and against the wrong, see Montazeri (1987, pp. 213–304).

  10. 10.

    In this regard, see Ali ibn Abu-Talib and Seyyed Razi (2006, Sermon 31, p. 216).

  11. 11.

    See Quran 4:141.

  12. 12.

    Regarding rule of rejection of path of God, see Bojnourdi (1998, pp. 185–207).

  13. 13.

    Traditional interpretations assume an exclusive decision-making role for God in Islam; however, one may argue that God does not have a physical presence on earth and He does not speak directly to people. Human beings, namely the clergy, claim to speak on behalf of God (i.e. to be His representatives). Islam explicitly decrees that no person or member of an institution (e.g. the clergy or the state) has the authority to represent God on earth. According to the Islamic scriptures, with the exception of the Prophets, no human being is authorised to convey God’s orders. Still, the Islamic scriptures do refer to human beings as the Caliphs of Allah on earth. Reformist reading of Islam argues for the reconciliation of God’s authority with people’s authority by asserting that people as a whole represent God on earth. This is a compelling standpoint from which to argue for popular sovereignty and the right of the people to exercise political authority.

  14. 14.

    La fahkre lel-‘Arab ‘alal-‘Ajam wa la lel-‘abyadhe ‘alal-aswade ella bet-taqwa.

  15. 15.

    See Kadivar (2009b).

  16. 16.

    I have dealt with this issue extensively in ‘Mas’aleye barde-dari da islam-e mo’aser’ (The Issue of Slave Holding in Contemporary Islam.) in Kadivar (2008a).

  17. 17.

    I have discussed the fourth sphere in detail in my book (Kadivar, 2008b).

  18. 18.

    Torkoman (1995, pp. 59–60).

  19. 19.

    Torkoman (1995, pp. 56–58).

  20. 20.

    Torkoman (1995, pp. 104, 106).

  21. 21.

    Qutb (1996, vol. 9).

  22. 22.

    Al-Tabatabai (2004). See the discussion of social relations in Islam at the end of al-Omran Sura, vol. 4. Also see ‘Velayat va za‘amat dar Islam’ (Guardianship and Representation in Islam) in Al-Tabatabai (1990, p. 182).

  23. 23.

    Islam accepted and practiced many of the pre-Islamic-established rules pertaining to socio-political matters in order to achieve justice (Kadivar, 2002: 427). They can be valid insofar as they are seen to be just and rational according to the conventions of time and space. Thus, all precepts which are not just and rational in the context of the conventions of time and place ought to be abolished. Instead of modifying these precepts, we should see them as outdated and disqualified from practice. Rational laws ought to be issued by the collective reasoning of people, and these laws must not be attributed to religion (Kadivar, 2002: 429).

Bibliography

  • Al-Tabatabai, M. H. (1990). Barrasihaye Islami [Islamic investigations]. Qom: Boostan-e Kitab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tabatabai, M. H. (2004). Al-Mizan: Tafsir al-Kor’an [The balance in the interpretation of the Qur’an]. Beirut: Al Alami Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali ibn Abu-Talib, & Seyyed Razi. (2006). Nahj al Balaghah [Peak of eloquence for children]. New York: Tahrike Tarsile Qur’an.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1999). Democracy and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojnourdi, M. H. (1998). Al-Qava‘ed al fiqhiyeh [Rules of jurisprudence]. Qom: Al-Hadi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enayat, H. (1982). Modern Islamic political thought. London: The Macmillan Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, J., & Piscatori, J. (1996). Islam and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2001a). Nezarat bar amalkard-e vali-ye faqih [Supervision over the performance of the jurisconsult guardian]. Aftab, 7, 65–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2001b). The political rights of the people in Islam: The right to choose destiny. In H. Salimi (Ed.), Islamic views on human rights: Viewpoints of Iranian scholars (pp. 107–124). Tehran: Al-Hoda International Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2002). Az Islam-e Tarikhi be Islam Maanavi [From Historical to Spiritual Islam]. In M. M. Shabestari, A. Soroush, M. Malekian, M. Kadivar (Eds.), Sunnat va secularism (Tradition and secularism). Tehran: Serat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2006). Freedom of thought and religion in Islam and human rights document. In M. Kamrava (Ed.), The new voices of Islam: Rethinking politics and modernity: A reader (pp. 119–142). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2008a). Haghgh on-Nass [The right of people: Islam & human rights]. Tehran: Kavir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2008b). Hokumat-e velayee [The guardianship government] (5 ed.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2009a). From historical to spiritual Islam. Tehran: Kavir Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadivar, M. (2009b). Human rights and religious intellectualism. In K. Vogt, L. Larsen, & C. Moe (Eds.), New directions in Islamic thought: Exploring reform and Muslim tradition (pp. 47–74). London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montazeri, H. (1987). Darasat fi velayeh al-faqi-yeh va fiqh al-dolah al islamyah [Teachings on the guardianship of the jurisconsult and jurisprudence of the Islamic government]. Qom: The Office of Grand Ayatollah Montazeri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, & Allen, R. E. (2006). The republic. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qutb, S. (1996). Fi zilal al-qur’an [In the shade of the Qur’an]. Beirut: Dar al-Shuruq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qutb, S. (2006). Al-Salam al-‘Alami wa al-Islam [World peace and Islam]. Cairo: Maktatat Wahba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sa’di, & Newman, R. J. (2004). Selections from Saadi’s Gulistan. London: Alhoda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torkoman, M. (1995). Rasaele Sheikh Fazlollah Nouri [Dissertations of Sheikh Fazlollah Nouri]. Tehran: Rasa Cultural Center.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kadivar, M. (2018). Islam and Democracy: Perspectives from Reformist and Traditional Islam. In: Esposito, J., Zubaidah Rahim, L., Ghobadzadeh, N. (eds) The Politics of Islamism. Middle East Today. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62256-9_2

Download citation