Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction: Views of Others in School Textbooks—A Theoretical Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Alterities

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Educational Media ((PSEM))

Abstract

It is generally assumed that school textbooks play a prominent role in children’s cultural upbringing. In their formative years, children’s minds are particularly elastic and vulnerable. School textbooks have the capacity to influence their value system and this change may well remain with them for the rest of their lives. This renders the school system and textbooks in particular key tools with which states can inculcate its citizens with a shared collective identity. Each generation transmits to the next its traditions, norms and values (Berghahn and Schissler 1987: 1–2; Pingel 1999: 7). No other instruments of socialisation can be compared to textbooks “in their capacity to convey a uniform, approved, even official version of what youth should believe” (Mehlinger 1985: 287). Textbooks are thus often implemented in order to promote a certain belief system and legitimise an established political and social order. In other words, the curriculum is never simply a neutral assemblage of knowledge incidentally appearing in the texts and classrooms. Rather, the selection and organisation of knowledge for schools is an ideological process that serves the interests of particular classes and social groups (Apple 1993: 1–14, 44–63). In his analysis of the US education system, Michael Apple has concluded that what counts as legitimate and official knowledge “is the result of complex power relations and struggles among identifiable class, race, gender/sex, and religious groups” (Apple and Smith 1991: 2–3). Both curricula and textbooks provide “battlegrounds” on which questions of power and cultural authority are contested (Lassig 2009: 4). The result is a reflection of the discourse of the hegemonic group in a society (Nasser 2005: 47). An analysis of school textbooks can therefore provide a window, or rather a mirror, through which the researcher can gain valuable insights as to the social and political parameters of a given society, its anxieties and trepidations as well as the processes of nation-building, identity construction and social change (Schissler and Soysal 2005: 7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The comprehensive work invested in the field, as reflected in the work and publications of the Georg Eckert Institute for Textbook Revision in Germany—which since 1975 has served as Europe’s leading centre for administrating, organising and sponsoring the study of international textbook revision—is perhaps an indication of the seriousness with which the textbook is still regarded (Podeh 2002: 5).

  2. 2.

    http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=15244&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (Accessed January 2017).

  3. 3.

    “The Declaration and Integrated Framework of Action on Education for Peace, Human Rights and Democracy”, adopted in Geneva, October 1994: http://wpdi.org/sites/default/files/REV_74_E.PDF (Accessed January 2017).

  4. 4.

    Report of UNESCO to the UNGA with regard to the project “Towards a Culture of Peace”, submitted in September 1996: http://www.un.org/documents/ga/docs/51/plenary/a51-395.htm (Accessed January 2017).

  5. 5.

    In psychology, this term means “the psychological use of others for self-affirmation, the enhancement of personal integrity, the provision of solace during times of misfortune or adversity” (Galatzer-Levy and Cohler 1993: 360).

References

  • Ahnaf, M.I. 2006. The Image of the Other as Enemy: Radical Discourse in Indonesia. Bangkok: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alayan, S., A. Rohde, and S. Dhouib, eds. 2012. The Politics of Education Reform in the Middle East: Self and Other in Textbooks and Curricula. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alayan, S. 2016. “The Holocaust in Palestinian Textbooks: Differences and Similarities in Israel and Palestine.” Comparative Educational Review 60 (1): 80–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. 1987. “Textbooks in Comparative Contexts.” In Educational Technology: Its Creation, Development and Cross-Cultural Transfer, ed. R. Murray Thomas and V. Kobayashi, 159–175. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amishai-Maisals, Z. 1999. “The Demonization of the ‘Other’ in the Visual Arts.” In Demonizing the Other: Anti-Semitism, Racism and Xenophobia, ed. R.S. Wistrich, 44–72. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, V., L. Li, and Y.N. Soysal. 2005. Nation and Other in Greek and Turkish History Textbooks. In The Nation, Europe and the World: Textbooks and Curricula in Transition, ed. H. Schissler and Y.N. Soysal, 105–121. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M.W. 1990. Ideology and Curriculum. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M.W., and L.K. Smith, eds. 1991. The Politics of the Textbook. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, M. 2007. A Muslim View of Christianity: Essays on Dialogue. New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, H. 2013. Europe and the Eastern Other. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, D. 1999. The ‘Others’ Within Us: A Socio-Psychological Perspective on Changes in Israeli Identity. Jerusalem: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. [Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D. and Hammack, P. L. 2012. “Conflict, Delegitimization and Violence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Intergroup Conflict, ed. L. R. Tropp. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., and Y. Teichman. 2004. Stereotypes and Prejudice in Conflict: Representation of Arabs in Israeli Jewish Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Befu, H. 1999. “Demonizing the ‘Other’.” In Demonizing the Other: Anti-Semitism, Racism and Xenophobia, ed. R.S. Wistrich, 25–30. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghahn, V.R. and Schissler, H. eds. 1987. Perceptions of History: International Textbook Research in Britain, Germany and the United States. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chérif, M. 2008. Islam and the West: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. Trans. T.L. Fagan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, N. 2000. Islam and the West: The Making of an Image. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumato, E.A., and G. Starrett, eds. 2007. Teaching Islam: Textbooks and Religion in the Middle East. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S.N. 2000a. “Multiple Modernities.” Daedalus 129: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. “Preface to the Issue ‘Multiple Modernities’.” Daedalus 129: v–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J., ed. 1985. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiala, R. 2006. “Educational Ideology and the School Curriculum.” In School Knowledge in Comparative and Historical Perspective—Changing Curricula in Primary and Secondary Education, ed. A. Benavot and C. Braslavsky, 1–20. Hong Kong: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firer, R., and S. Adwan. 2004. The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in History and Civics Textbooks of Both Nations. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, E. 2011. “Current Trends in History and Social Studies Textbook Research.” Journal of International Cooperation in Education 14: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. “The (Hi)story of Textbooks: Research Trends in a Field of Textbook-Related Research.” International Journal for the Historiography of Education 4: 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galatzer-Levy, R.M., and B.J. Cohler. 1993. The Essential Other: A Developmental Psychology of the Self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. 1981. “Improving Elementary Mathematics Education in Nicaragua: An Experimental Study of the Impact of Textbooks and Radio on Achievement.” Journal of Education Psychology 73: 556–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabapinar, V. 2007. “The Image of Others and Tolerance in Turkish History and Social Studies Textbooks: ‘Not Us’, ‘The Other is to Blame’.” In Teaching for Tolerance in Muslim Majority Societies, ed. R. Kaymakcan and O. Leirvik, 33–50. Istanbul: Center for Values Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerling, B. 1995. “Academic History Caught in the Crossfire: The Case of Israeli-Jewish Historiography.” History and Memory 7: 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobmeyer, W. 1990. International Textbook Research. Goteborg: Goteborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labib, T., ed. 2008. Imagining the Arab Other: How Arabs and Non-Arabs View Each Other. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassig, S. 2009. “Textbooks and Beyond: Educational Media in Context(s).” Journal of Educational Media, Memory and Society 1: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Post-Conflict Reconciliation and Joint History Textbook Project.” In History Education and Post-Conflict Reconciliation: Reconsidering Joint textbook Projects, ed. K.V. Korostelina and S. Lassig, 1–25. New York: Routledge pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. 1998. Multiple Identities in the Middle East. New York: Shocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D.B., and M. DeCoste, eds. 2014. Europe in Its Own Eyes, Europe in the Eyes of the Other. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist, edited, with an Introduction, by Charles W. Morris, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlinger, H.D. 1985. “International Textbook Revision: Examples from the United States.” Internationale Schulbuchforschung 7 (4): 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasser, R.M. 2005. Palestinian Identity in Jordan and Israel: The Necessary ‘Other’ in the Making of a Nation. New-York-London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Recovered Histories and Contested Identities: Jordan, Israel and Palestine. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. “Ethos and Logos in Israeli Citizenship: Discourse Analysis of Civic Studies Textbooks.” British Journal of Middle East Studies 40: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, J., ed. 2006. School Textbooks across Cultures: International Debates and Perspectives. Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S. 2010. “Our View on the Other: Issues regarding School Textbooks.” British Journal of Religious Education 32: 41–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peled-Elhanan, N. 2012. Palestine in Israeli School Books: Ideology and Propaganda in Education. London: Tauris Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, I. 1994. “Otherness and Israel’s Arab Dilemma.” In The Other in Jewish Thought and History: Constructions of Jewish Culture and Identity, ed. L.J. Silberstein and R.L. Cohn, 258–280. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingel, F. 1999. UNESCO Guidebook: On Textbook Research and Textbook Revision. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Contested Past, Disputed Present: Curricula and Teaching in Israeli and Palestinian Schools. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podeh, E. 2002. The Arab-Israeli Conflict in Israeli History Textbooks, 1948–2000. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. “Demonizing the Other: Israeli Perceptions of Nasser and Nasserism.” In Rethinking Nasserism: Revolution and Historical Memory in Modern Egypt, ed. E. Podeh and O. Winckler, 72–99. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E.W. 1995. Orientalism. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikal, A. 2003. Islam and the West: Conflict or Cooperation? London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schissler, H. 1989–1990. “Limitations and Priorities for International Social Studies Textbook Research.” International Journal of Social Education 4: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schissler, H., and Y.N. Soysal, eds. 2005. The Nation, Europe and the World: Textbooks and Curricula in Transition. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuddekopf, O.E. 1967. History Teaching and History Textbook Revision. Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-operation of the Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, L.J. 1994. “Others within and Others Without: Rethinking Jewish Identity and Culture.” In The Other in Jewish Thought and History: Constructions of Jewish Culture and Identity, ed. L.J. Silberstein and R.L. Cohn, 1–34. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen, K. 2004. “Europe: National Identities and Multiple Others.” European Urban and Regional Studies 11: 357–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, G. 2007. “Textbook Meanings and the Power of Interpretation.” In Teaching Islam: Textbooks and Religion in the Middle East, ed. E.A. Doumato and G. Starrett, 215–231. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strath, B., ed. 2000. Europe and the Other and Europe as the Other. Brussels: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandafyllidou, A. 1998. “National Identity and the ‘Other’.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 21: 593–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urschel, D. 2002. “Teaching the Other: Muslims, Non-Muslims and the Stories They Teach.” http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0212/textbooks.html

  • Watson, W. 1985. “Universals in Intercultural Perception.” In As Others See Us: Mutual Perceptions East and West, ed. B. Lewis, E. Leites, and M. Case, 301–310. New York: International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J.V. 2002. Voices of Collective Remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woelfel, J., and A. Haller. 1971. “Significant Others: The Self-Reflexive Act and the Attitude Formation Process.” American Sociological Review 36: 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmiz, H., and A.E. Cagla. 2012. Perceptions of Islam in Europe: Culture, Identity and the Muslim ‘Other’. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, Y. 1995. Recovered Roots: Collective Memory and the Making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and David Yellin Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel

    Samira Alayan & Elie Podeh

Authors
  1. Samira Alayan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elie Podeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Islamic and Middle Eastern Studies, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

    Elie Podeh

  2. School of Education, Hebrew University of Jerusalem and David Yellin Academic College, Jerusalem, Israel

    Samira Alayan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alayan, S., Podeh, E. (2018). Introduction: Views of Others in School Textbooks—A Theoretical Analysis. In: Podeh, E., Alayan, S. (eds) Multiple Alterities. Palgrave Studies in Educational Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62244-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62244-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62243-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62244-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation