Advertisement

Introduction

  • Katiuscia VaccariniEmail author
  • Francesca Spigarelli
  • Ernesto Tavoletti
  • Christoph Lattemann
Chapter
  • 468 Downloads

Abstract

In this book, we investigate the concept of “distance”, in particular the concepts of “cultural distance” and “psychic distance” in international business contexts. We particularly focus on the green tech industry and Sino-European FDI. We analyze managers’ perceived distance (measured on twelve dimensions such as culture, language, political system, and business practices) between the firm’s home country and the firm’s host country (Child et al. 2009). After introducing the concept of psychic distance and the context of our research, we present in the second chapter a systematic literature review on psychic distance as a factor for FDI motivation and location decisions. Chapter  3 follows up on the relevance of culture and cultural differences in international business and illustrates how insights from the field of social psychology may help to overcome cultural pitfalls in international business and how to manage cultural conflicts. The fourth chapter explores managers’ perceptions of psychic distances in the context of European green tech FDI to China by applying a multiple-case study research design. Our analyses show that managers’ perceptions of psychic distances vary over time, i.e., between the points in time before managers enter a market and after they have entered the market. In Chap.  5, we examine the relevance of Chinese managers’ perceived distance for their FDI decisions and the changes of their perceptions after entering a foreign market and after gaining experiences in operating in the host country. Here, we particularly focus on Chinese FDI flows in the green tech sector to Europe, with a country focus on Germany, by presenting six case studies. This analysis shows that managers, with and without experiences in foreign markets, should not depend their FDI decision on their perceptions of differences between countries. This book ends with concluding remarks and a summary of the research findings. The presented research is part of an EU Marie Curie project on Partnering Opportunities between Europe and China in the Renewable Energy and Environmental iNdustry (POREEN 1 ).

Keywords

PD Psychic distance Dimensions Managers’ perceptions Cultural distance Cultural pitfalls International business Green tech industry Sino-European FDI European investments European Marie Curie project 

References

  1. Aiwa, M., & Yang, C. (2010). Green credit, green stimulus, green revolution? China’s mobilization of banks for environmental cleanup. The Journal of Environment and Development, 19(2), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(31), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer, M. B. (2003). Intergroup relations. Berkshire: Free University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brewer, P. (2007). Psychic distance and Australian export market selection. Australian Journal of Management, 32(1), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, H., & Chen, T.-J. (1998). Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Child, J., Rodrigues, S. B., & Frynas, J. G. (2009). Psychic distance, its impact and coping modes: Interpretations of SMEs decision-makers. Management International Review, 49(2), 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coughlin, C. C., & Segev, E. (2000). Foreign direct investment in China: A spatial econometric study. The World Economy, 3(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curran, L. (2015). The impact of trade policy on global production networks: The solar panel case. Review of International Political Economy. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1014927. Accessed Apr 2017.
  9. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harzing, A. W. (2003). The role of culture in entry-mode studies: From neglect to myopia? In J. L. C. Cheng & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Managing multinationals in a knowledge economy: Economics culture advances in international management, 15, 75–127. Emerald Group: Bingley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hashim, F. (2012). Outward internationalization and FDI: Motives for Malaysian MNEs moving into China. Review of Business & Finance Studies, 3(2), 89–102.Google Scholar
  12. Hu, A. (2014). China: Innovative green development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang, R., & Chen, D. (2015). Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.Google Scholar
  16. Langer, K., & Watson, R. (2004). The greening of China’s building industry. China Business Review, 31(6), 56–63.Google Scholar
  17. Lv, P., & Spigarelli, F. (2015). The integration of Chinese and European renewable energy markets: The role of Chinese foreign direct investments. Energy Policy, 81, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lv, P., & Spigarelli, F. (2016). The determinants of location choice: Chinese foreign direct investments in the European renewable energy sector. International Journal of Emerging Markets, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  19. Schütte, H., & Chen, S. (2012). Reaching high: Sany’s internationalization (A) and (B). China Europe International Business School, case CC-312-019, case CC-312-020.Google Scholar
  20. Spigarelli, F. (2009). Le multinazionali dei paesi emergenti: Gli investimenti cinesi in Italia [MNEs from emerging countries: Chinese investment in Italy. With English summary]. Economia Politica e Industriale, 36(2), 131–159.Google Scholar
  21. Spigarelli, F. (2010). Chinese investments in Italy: Is the wave arriving? International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management, 1(1), 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folksways. New York: Ginn.Google Scholar
  23. Turner, J. C. (1975). Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. UNCTAD. (2014, January 28). Global investment trends monitor. (No 15). New York: United Nations. Google Scholar
  25. Wei, W., & Alon, I. (2010). Chinese outward direct investment: A study on macroeconomic determinants. International Journal and Emerging Markets, 2(4), 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. S., & Nachum, L. (2012). Distance without direction: Restoring credibility to a much-loved construct. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang, K. H. (2001). China’s inward FDI boom and the greater Chinese economy. The Chinese Economy, 34(1), 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katiuscia Vaccarini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesca Spigarelli
    • 2
  • Ernesto Tavoletti
    • 2
  • Christoph Lattemann
    • 3
  1. 1.Free University of Bozen-BolzanoBolzanoItaly
  2. 2.University of MacerataMacerataItaly
  3. 3.Jacobs UniversityBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations