Older Firefighters: A Problem to Be Managed or a Resource to Be Valued?

  • Anita PickerdenEmail author


Firefighters used to work a 30-year career and retire in their 50s. When the life expectancy of a retired firefighter was limited by their lungs being damaged by smoke inhalation, this did not place too heavy a financial burden on the Fire and Rescue Service (FRS) or the government. However, the increased longevity of the working population has created the need to extend working lives, and the impact upon firefighters has been to expect up to 40 years’ employment plus additional pension contributions.

In common with many large employers, the FRS has not been proactive in dealing with this challenge and is now faced with devising protocols to manage an increasing number of firefighters who may work until their 60s. Throughout this chapter, the term ‘Older Firefighters’ is taken to mean those who may retire at an age beyond the former traditional retirement age for UK firefighters of 50.

Financial contributions, diminishing fitness levels and lack of motivation are issues that the FRS is only just starting to manage. This is particularly pressing as the additional ‘Green Watch’ firefighters (who were employed in the late 1970s and early 1980s) have retired and are not being replaced.

From an occupational health (OH) perspective, it is vital that FRS managers fully understand the role that OH plays in maintaining the bio-psycho-social wellbeing of the workforce. Health promotion on healthy lifestyles will be more important than ever, given the challenges presented by an ageing workforce, but it may be equally important to educate organisations in their attitudes to older workers, developing a culture of ‘smarter’ working, especially in terms of the operational firefighting role.

Using data collected in a metropolitan FRS together with a subsequent study of the relevant policies adopted in the English FRS, this chapter considers how the FRS could manage this situation effectively.


  1. Beers, H., & Butler, H. (2012). Age related changes and safety critical work: Identification of tools and a review of the literature. Health & Safety Laboratory HSE.Google Scholar
  2. Bohle, P., Pitts, C., & Quinlan, M. (2010). Time to call it quits? The safety and health of older workers. Workplace Health and Quality of Life: International Surveys International Journal of Health Services, 40(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
  3. Calvo, E., Haverstick, K., & Sass, S. A. (2009). Gradual retirement, sense of control, and retirees’ happiness. Research on Aging, 31(1), 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2008). Working in the fire service: A survey of current and ex-firefighters in England. Fire Research Technical Report 8/2008 HMSO.Google Scholar
  5. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012). Fire and rescue operational statistics bulletin for England 2011–12. HMSO.Google Scholar
  6. Farrow, A., & Reynolds, F. (2012). Health and safety of the older worker. Occupational Medicine, 62(1), 4–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankel, L. P., & Picascia, S. (2008). Workplace legacy: Making the most of the final five. Employment Relations Today Spring, 35(1), 1–7, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goodwin, J., & O’CONNOR, H. (2014). Notions of fantasy and reality in the adjustment to retirement. Ageing & Society, 34(4), 569–589.Google Scholar
  9. Hassell, B. L., & Perrewe, P. L. (1995). An examination of beliefs about older workers: Do stereotypes still exist? Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hutchison, E. D. (2010). Dimensions of Human behaviour: The changing life course (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Joe, C., Patel, K., & Yoong, P. (2013). Knowledge loss when older experts leave knowledge-intensive organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kelloway, K., & Barling, J. (2010). Leadership development as an intervention in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 24, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Loretto, W., & Vickerstaff, S. (2013). The domestic and gendered context for retirement. Human relations, 66(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moen, P., Erickson, W. A., Agarwal, M., Fields, V., & Todd, L. (2000). The Cornell retirement and well-being study. Ithaca, NY: Bronfenbrenner Life Course Center, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  15. Mostert, K. (2011). Job characteristics, work–home interference and burnout: Testing a structural model in the south African context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(5), 1036–1053. March 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Myck, M. (2015). Living longer, working longer: The need for a comprehensive approach to labour market reform in response to demographic changes. International Journal of Ageing, 12(1), 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parry, E., & Tyson, S. (2011). Managing an age diverse workforce. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pritchard, K., & Whiting, R. (2014). Baby boomers and the lost generation: On the discursive construction of generations at work. Organization Studies, 35(11), 1605–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rego, A., Vitória, A., Cunha, M. P. E., Tupinambá, A., & Leal, S. (2016, Feb). Developing and validating an instrument for measuring managers’ attitudes toward older workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2016, 1–34.Google Scholar
  20. Skinner, N., Parvazian, S., & Dorrian, J. (2010). FLAWS in our lives: Fatigue, work and life strain. Adelaide: Centre for Work + Life, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, L., Folkard, S., Tucker, P., & Macdonald, I. (1998). Work shift duration: A review comparing eight hour and 12 hour shift systems. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 55, 217–229.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Tasnim, Z. (2016). Happiness at workplace: Building a conceptual framework. World Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 62–70. July 2016 Special Issue.Google Scholar
  23. US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board. (2007). Investigation report: Refinery explosion and fire (15 Killed, 180 injured) BP Texas City 23rd March 2005. Report No 2005-04-I-TX March 2007.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Worcester Business SchoolUniversity of WorcesterWorcesterUK

Personalised recommendations