Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter

  • Karen Barad

Language has been granted too much power. The linguistic turn, the semiotic turn, the interpretative turn, the cultural turn: it seems that at every turn lately every “thing” – even materiality – is turned into a matter of language or some other form of cultural representation. Language matters. Discourse matters. Culture matters. There is an important sense in which the only thing that does not seem to matter anymore is matter.

What compels the belief that we have a direct access to cultural representations and their content that we lack toward the things represented? How did language come to be more trustworthy than matter? Why are language and culture granted their own agency and historicity while matter is figured as passive and immutable, or at best inherits a potential for change derivatively from language and culture? How does one even go about inquiring after the material conditions that have led us to such a brute reversal of naturalist beliefs when materiality itself is...


  1. Barad, Karen. 1995. A feminist approach to teaching quantum physics. In Teaching the majority: breaking the gender barrier in science, mathematics, and engineering, ed. Sue V. Rosser, 43–75. Athene Series. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen. 1996. Meeting the universe halfway: realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science, eds. Lynn Hankinson Nelson and Jack Nelson, 161–94. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen. 1998a. Agential realism: feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In The science studies reader, ed. Mario Biagioli, 1–11. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, Karen. 1998b. Getting real: technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10(2):87–126.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, Karen. 2001a. Performing culture/performing nature: using the piezoelectric crystal of ultrasound technologies as a transducer between science studies and queer theories. In Digital anatomy, ed. Christina Lammar, 98–114. Vienna: Turia & Kant.Google Scholar
  6. Barad, Karen. 2001b. Re(con)figuring space, time, and matter. In Feminist locations: global and local, theory and practice, ed. Marianne DeKoven, 75–109. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith. 1989. Foucault and the paradox of bodily inscriptions. Journal of Philosophy 86(11):601–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: on the discursive limits of “sex.”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, Gilles. 1988. Foucault. Trans. Sea´n Hand. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: an archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel. 1980a. The history of sexuality. vol. 1. an introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, Michel. 1980b. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977, ed. Gordon Colin, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  16. Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and intervening: introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Haraway, Donna. 1992. The promises of monsters: a regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In Cultural studies, ed. Lawrence Grossberg, Cory Nelson, Paula Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_witness@second_millennium.femaleman_meets_oncomouse_: feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hennessey, Rosemary. 1993. Materialist feminism and the politics of discourse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kirby, Vicki. 1997. Telling flesh: the substance of the corporeal. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and power: toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rouse, Joseph. 1996. Engaging science: how to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rouse, Joseph. 2002. How scientific practices matter: reclaiming philosophical naturalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 1993. Queer performativity: Henry James’s the art of the novel. A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 1(1):1–16.Google Scholar
  27. Shaviro, Steve. 1997. Doom patrols: a theoretical fiction about postmodernism. New York: Serpent’s Tail. Available on-line at Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations