Anatomical Assemblages: Medical Technologies, Bodies and their Entangled Practices

Chapter

References

  1. Barad, Karen. 1996. Meeting the universe halfway: Realism and social constructivism without contradiction. In Feminism, science, and the philosophy of science, eds. Lynn Hankinson Nelson, and Jack Nelson, 161–194. London: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen. 1998. Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10(2): 87–128.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, Karen. 2012. On touching – the inhuman that therefore I am. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 25(3): 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Callus, Ivan, and Stefan Herbrechter. 2012. Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject. Subjectivity 5: 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright, Lisa. 1998. A cultural anatomy of the visible human project. In The visible woman: Imaging technologies, gender, and science, eds. Paula Treichler, Lisa Cartwright, and Constance Penley, 21–43. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Diana, Coole, Samantha Frost eds. 2010. New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ferrando, Francesca. 2013. Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialism: Differences and relations. Existenz 8(2): 26–32.Google Scholar
  11. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How we became posthuman. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, Ericka. 2005. The ghost of anatomies past: Simulating the one-sex body in modern medical training. Feminist Theory 6(2): 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson, Ericka. 2008. Simulating medical patients and practices: Bodies and the construction of valid medical simulators. Body and Society 14(3): 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1998. Medicine and genres of display. In Visual display: Culture beyond appearances, eds. Lynne Cooke, and Peter Wollen, 202–217. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jordanova, Ludmilla. 1999. Nature displayed: Gender, science and medicine 1760–1820. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  16. Kirby, Vicki. 2012. Initial conditions. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 25(3): 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laqueur, Thomas. 1990. Making sex: Body and gender from the greeks to freud. London, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Laqueur, Thomas. 2003. Sex in the flesh. Isis 94(2): 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour, Bruno, and T. Hugh Crawford. 1993. An interview with Bruno Latour. Configurations: Journal of Literature, Science, and Technology 1(2): 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin, Emily. 1991. The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male-female roles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 16(3): 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin, Emily. 1992. The woman in the body: A cultural analysis of reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The body multiple. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nayar, Pramod K. 2014. Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Prentice, Rachel. 2013. Bodies in formation. An ethnography of anatomy and surgery education. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schiebinger, Londa. 1993. Nature’s body: Gender in the making of modern science. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schiebinger, Londa. 2003. Skelettestreit. Isis 94(2): 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sundén, Jenny. 2010. Blonde birth machines: Medical simulation, techno-corporeality and posthuman feminism. In Technology and medical practice: Blood, guts and machines, eds. Ericka Johnson, and Boel Berner, 97–117. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  28. Wailoo, Keith. 1999. Drawing blood. Technology and disease identity in twentieth-century america. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Waldby, Cathy. 2000. The Visible human project: Informatic bodies and posthuman medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tema Technology and Social Change, Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations