Preventing Nuclear Terrorism: Addressing Policy Gaps and Challenges

  • Kenneth LuongoEmail author
Part of the Terrorism, Security, and Computation book series (TESECO)


Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, there has been an intensified global effort to keep nuclear materials and weapons out of the hands of terrorists and non-state actors. This began with the creation and subsequent significant expansion of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, further intensifying after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. President Obama provided a special focus on this issue through the creation of the Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) process, resulting in four heads-of-state meetings. However, the NSS process did not address many of the difficult questions that could significantly strengthen nuclear security and constructed a weak bridge to future improvements. With the conclusion of the summits, the political momentum created by them is rapidly decreasing and the issue is settling back into the bureaucratic channels. The challenge now is how best to address the nuclear policy gaps and new threat challenges in a post-summit environment.


Nuclear security Nuclear security governance Nuclear and radiological terrorism Nuclear security summits Cooperative threat reduction efforts HEU and plutonium minimization and removal CPPNM INFCIRC/869 5 Priorities 



To Grecia Cosio, Research Associate at the Partnership for Global Security, for her significant research and contributions to this paper.


  1. 1.
    Bunn, M.: Securing the Bomb 2010: Securing All Nuclear Materials in Four Years. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weapon Material Basics. Union of Concerned Scientists (2009),
  3. 3.
    IAEA Incident and Trafficking Database. (2016),
  4. 4.
    Lee, B., Schmerler D.: CNS Global Incidents and Trafficking Database: 2015 Annual Report. (2016),
  5. 5.
    Nuclear Security Series Glossary. International Atomic Energy Agency, Version 1.3, 18 (2015),
  6. 6.
    Hand, K., Lyudmila, Z.: Nuclear Smuggling Chains: Suppliers, Intermediaries, and End-Users. American Behavioral Scientist, vol.46, 822–844. Sage Publications (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmid, A.P., Spencer-Smith, C.: Illicit Radiological and Nuclear Trafficking, Smuggling and Security Incidents in the Black Sea Region since the Fall of the Iron Curtain-an Open Source Inventory. Perspectives on Terrorism, vol.6 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nunn, S., Lugar, R.G.: Dismantling the Soviet Arsenal. The Washington Post, A25 (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stern, J.E.: U.S. Assistance Programs for Improving MPC&A in the Former Soviet Union. The Nonproliferation Review, Winter, 17–32 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luongo, K.N.: Improving U.S.-Russian Nuclear Cooperation. Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 58 (2001),
  11. 11.
    Global Security Engagement: A New Model for Cooperative Threat Reduction. Office of Senator Richard Lugar Press Release (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism.
  13. 13.
    Security Council Unanimously Adopts Wide-Ranging Anti-Terrorism Resolution. United Nations Security Council press release SC/7158 (2001),
  14. 14.
    Remarks by President Barack Obama. Office of the Press Secretary, The White House (2009),
  15. 15.
    Global Fissile Material Report 2009: A Path to Nuclear Disarmament. International Panel on Fissile Materials (2009),
  16. 16.
    Cann, M., Luongo, K.: Nuclear Security: Seoul, the Netherlands, and Beyond. U.S.-Korea Institute (2013),

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Partnership for Global SecurityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations