Skip to main content

Genealogy of Performance-Based Seismic Design: Is the Present a Re-crafted Version of the Past?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering ((GGEE,volume 44))

Abstract

Structural engineering for earthquake resistance is undergoing a major revision in its approach toward the fulfillment of seismic safety and utilitarian serviceability in design. Rather than sticking to the established precepts of prescriptive design rules, design has turned toward the achievement of specific results through procedures that are tailored for different buildings and uses. These procedures represent notable research contributions, but they are complicated conceptually for implementation in structural engineering practice, and nonlinear building response estimates, frequently assumed to be performance, can vary within broad limits even for simple applications.

In this text we relate the history of code developments. We focus on the two main requirements of earthquake-resistant design of building structures: (1) Life Safety and (2) Protection of the Investment and relate the two demands to current concepts of Performance-Based Building Design. While we provide a personalized vision for the way in which the PBSD framework developed and matured during the last half century, a thorough historiography is not within the scope of the text. We nominate drift to serve as the prime metric for performance judgment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wilson (2000) observes that structural engineering must contend with many poorly known or estimated parameters in its pursuit of creating structures that serve communities in some way.

References

  • Anderson AW et al (1951) Lateral forces of earthquake and wind. In: Proceedings of American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. 77, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang BG, Priestley MJN, Paulay T (1985) Seismic shear strength of circular bridge piers. Research report No. 85–5, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, July, 408 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1997a) NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273, ATC 33 Project), October, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (1997b) NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 273, ATC 33 Project), October, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, vol. 1 – Methodology, FEMA P-58-1, September

    Google Scholar 

  • Applied Technology Council (2013) Evaluation of the methodology to select and prioritize collapse indicators in older concrete buildings, ATC-78-1, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa T, He M, Arai Y, Mizoguchi M (1987) Ultimate shear strength of spirally-confined concrete columns. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 9:305–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa T, He M, Arai Y, Mizoguchi M (1988) Shear resisting behavior of reinforced concrete columns with spiral hoops. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 10:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa T, Arai Y, Mizoguchi M, Yoshida M (1989) Shear resisting behavior of short reinforced concrete columns under biaxial bending-shear. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 11:317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC (1978) Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings (ATC 3–06). Applied Technology Council, Redwood City

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayhan B, Gülkan P (2011) Buildings subjected to recurring earthquakes: a tale of three cities. Earthquake Spectra 27(3):635–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertero R, Bertero VV (2004) Performance-based seismic engineering: development and application of a comprehensive conceptual approach to the design of buildings. In: Bozorgnia Y, Bertero VV (eds) From engineering seismology to performance-based engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bett BJ, Klingner RE, Jirsa JO (1985) Behavior of strengthened and repaired reinforced columns under cyclic deformations. PMFSEL report no. 85–3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Texas, December, 75 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder RW, Wheeler WT (1960) Building code provisions for Aseismic design. In: Proceedings of the second world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo, pp 1843–1857

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume JA, Newmark NM, Corning LH (1961) Design of multistory reinforced concrete buildings for earthquake motions. Portland Cement Association, Skokie

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW (1962) The Agadir, Morocco Earthquake, February 29, 1960, American Iron and Steel Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard MO, Berry MP (2003) A simple performance model for bar buckling. In: Proceedings of PEER conference on performance based design, Hakone, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (2014) Private communication

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai H, Yamamoto Y (1986) A study on causes of earthquake damage of Izumi high school due to Miyagi-ken-Oki earthquake in 1978. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 8:405–418

    Google Scholar 

  • International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) (1994) Uniform building code, vol 2, 5360 S. Workman Mill Rd., Whittier, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) (1997) Uniform building code, vol. 2, 5360 S. Workman Mill Rd., Whittier

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanda M, Shirai N, Adachi H, Sato T (1988) Analytical study on Elasto-plastic hysteretic behaviors of reinforced concrete members. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 10:257–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Labbé P, Altınyollar A (2011) Conclusions of an IAEA–JRC research project on the safety significance of near-field seismic motions. Nucl Eng Des 241:1842–1856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langenbach R (2003) Cross-walls instead of shear-walls: a proposed research project for the retrofit of vulnerable reinforced concrete buildings in earthquake areas based on the traditional “hımış” construction. In: Proceedings of the fifth [Turkish] national conference on earthquake engineering, Istanbul. Available on www.conservationtech.com

  • LePage A (1997) A method for drift control in earthquake-resistant design of reinforced concrete building structures. Thesis submitted to the Graduate College of the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagasaka T (1982) Effectiveness of steel fiber as web reinforcement in reinforced concrete columns. Trans Jpn Concr Institute 4:493–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohue M, Morimoto H, Fujii S, Morita S (1985) The behavior of R.C. Short columns failing in splitting bond shear under dynamic lateral loading. Trans Jpn Concr Inst 7:293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk BO (2003) Seismic drift response of building structures in seismically active and near fault regions. Thesis submitted to Purdue University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrovski J, Ristic D (1984) Reversed cyclic loading test of bridge column models. Report IZIIS 84–164, Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, September, 62 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (2000) Performance based seismic design. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujol S (2002) Drift capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to displacement reversals. Thesis submitted to Purdue University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujol S, Ramirez JA, Sozen MA (1999) Drift Capacity of reinforced concrete columns subjected to cyclic shear reversals. In: Krishnan K (ed) ACI special publication SP-187. ACI, Farmington Hills, Michigan, pp 255–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Saatcioglu M, Özcebe G (1989) Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading. ACI Struct J, January–February, pp 3-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California (SAEOC) (1959) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, 171 2nd Street, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • SEAOC (1967) Recommended lateral force requirements, seismology committee, structural engineers Association of California, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismology Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California (SAEOC) (1974) Recommended lateral force requirements and commentary, 171 2nd Street, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki K, Sozen MA (1984) Seismic drift of reinforced concrete structures. Technical report, Hazama-Gumi, Tokyo, pp 145–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Soesianawati MT, Park R, Priestley MJN (1986) Limited ductility design of reinforced concrete columns. Report 86–10, Department of Civil Engeering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, March, 208 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sozen MA (1981) Review of earthquake response of RC buildings with a view to drift control. In: Ergünay O, Erdik M (eds) State-of-the-art in earthquake engineering. Kelaynak Press, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobriner S (1984a) The history of building codes to the 1920s. In: Proceedings, SEAOC annual convention, structural engineers association of California, Sacramento, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobriner S (1984b) A history of reinforced masonry construction designed to resist earthquakes: 1755–1907. Earthq Spect 1(1), November

    Google Scholar 

  • Umehara H, Jirsa JO (1982) Shear strength and deterioration of short reinforced concrete columns under cyclic deformations. PMFSEL report no. 82–3, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, July, 256 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Veterans Administration (VA) Office of Construction (1972) Report of the earthquake and wind forces committee, earthquake resistant design requirements for VA hospital facilities, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL (2000) Three-dimensional static and dynamic analysis of structures. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Martirossyan A (1998) Seismic performance of high strength concrete columns. J Struct Eng Am Soc Civil Eng (ASCE) 124(3, March):241–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahn FA, Park R, Priestley MJN (1986) Design of reinforced concrete bridge columns for strength and ductility. Report 86-7, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, March, 380 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Gülkan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gülkan, P., Sözen, M.A. (2018). Genealogy of Performance-Based Seismic Design: Is the Present a Re-crafted Version of the Past?. In: Rupakhety, R., Ólafsson, S. (eds) Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics in Memory of Ragnar Sigbjörnsson. ICESD 2017. Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering, vol 44. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62099-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics