Maxillofacial Injuries

  • Alessandro Stasolla


The face is a complex three-dimensional anatomic region involved in special senses, cosmetics and personal identity, whose even minor injury may be associated with significant damage. The radiologist is often the primary specialist interpreting facial injuries, therefore assuming a special clinical responsibility. Apart from the diagnosis of fractures themselves, radiologists should try to anticipate the complications of the trauma. Injuries affecting the airway and threatening vision should be evaluated with the highest priority. Reporting by shortcuts as 3D VR images or clear sinus sign should be avoided: all the CT axial, coronal and sagittal images have to be evaluated.


Facial trauma Computed tomography Orbital fractures Frontal sinus fractures Midfacial fractures Zygomatic fractures Nasal bone fractures Naso-orbital-ethmoidal fractures Mandibular fractures 


  1. 1.
    Boffano P, Roccia F, Zavattero E, et al. European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: a multicentre and prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pagnoni M, Marenco M, Ramieri V, Terenzi V, Bartoli D, Amodeo G, Mazzoli A, Iannetti G. Late treatment of orbital fractures: a new analysis for surgical planning. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2014;34:439–45.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anuja KA, Ranzer MJ, Cohen MN. Clinical assessment of the trauma patient. In: Taub PJ, et al., editors. Ferraro’s fundamentals of maxillofacial surgery. New York: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Du H, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhao T. [Clinical application of multiplanar reconstruction and volume rendering with 64-slice spiral CT in the complex midfacial fracture]. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(4):160–2.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Illum P. Legal aspects in nasal fractures. Rhinology. 1991;29(4):263–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grechushkin V, Boroda K, Chaudhry A, et al. Reevaluating the utility of maxillary sinus opacification as a screening tool for facial bone fracture a decade after its original analysis. Cureus. 2016;8(2):e487. doi: 10.7759/cureus.487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maroldi R, Sala F. La diagnostica per immagini nella patologia traumatica maxillo-facciale. In: Rotondo A, editor. Odontoiatria. Diagnostica per immagini. Idelson Gnocchi, Napoli, 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banta J. Ocular trauma. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Betts AM, O’Brien WT, Davies BW, et al. A systematic approach to CT evaluation of orbital trauma. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21:511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chaudhary R, Upendran M, Campion N, Yeung A, Blanch R, Morgan-Warren P, Gibb I, Nelson T, Scott R. The role of computerised tomography in predicting visual outcome in ocular trauma patients. Eye. 2015;29:867–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Cheng HC, Guo WY, Teng MM, Chen SJ, Lin TC. CT of globe rupture: analysis and frequency of findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(5):1100–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mancuso AA, Verbist BM. Tension orbit and its acute threat to vision. In: Mancuso AA, Hanafee WN, editors. Head and neck radiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Han MH, Chang KH, Min YG, Choi WS, Yeon KM, Han MC. Nontraumatic prolapse of the orbital contents into the ethmoid sinus: evaluation with screening sinus CT. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996;17(3):184–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alcalá-Galiano A, Arribas-García IJ, Martín-Pérez MA, Romance A, Montalvo-Moreno JJ, Juncos JM. Pediatric facial fractures: children are not just small adults. Radiographics. 2008;28:441–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clopton D, Mukherjee S, Christophel JJ, Wintermark M, Raghavan P. Head and neck trauma. In: Raghavan P, et al., editors. Manual of head and neck imaging. Berlin: Springer; 2014.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bodanapally UK, Van der Byl G, Shanmuganathan K, Katzman L, Geraymovych E, Saksobhavivat N, Mirvis SE, Sudini KR, Krejza J, Shin RK. Traumatic optic neuropathy prediction after blunt facial trauma: derivation of a risk score based on facial CT findings at admission. Radiology. 2014;272(3):824–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bush K, Huikeshoven M, Wong N. Nasofrontal outflow tract visibility in computed tomography imaging of frontal sinus fractures. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2013;6:237–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hong HS, Cha JG, Paik SH, Park SJ, Park JS, Kim DH, Lee HK. High-resolution sonography for nasal fracture in children. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(1):W86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gharehdaghi J, Samadi Rad B, Samani VG, Kolahi F, Zonoozian AK, Marashian SM. Comparison of Physical Examination and Conventional Radiography in Diagnosis of Nasal Fracture. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(Suppl 2):S304–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, et al. Management of the medial canthal tendon in nasoethmoid orbital fractures: the importance of the central fragment in classification and treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;87(5):843–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hopper RA, Salemy S, Sze RW. Diagnosis of Midface Fractures with CT: what the surgeon needs to know. Radiographics. 2006;26:783–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Simonds JS, Whitlow CT, Chen MYM, Williams DW III. Isolated fractures of the posterior maxillary sinus: CT appearance and proposed mechanism. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:468–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magagula S, Hardcastle T. Defining current facial fracture patterns in a quaternary institution following high-velocity blunt trauma. S Afr J Rad. 2016;20(1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ludi EK, Rohatgi S, Zygmont ME, Khosa F, Hanna TN. Do radiologists and surgeons speak the same language? A retrospective review of facial trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rhea JT. Novelline RA how to simplify the CT diagnosis of Le Fort fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(5):1700–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dreizin D, Nam AJ, Tirada N, Levin MD, Stein DM, Bodanapally UK, Mirvis SE, Munera F. Multidetector CT of mandibular fractures, reductions, and complications: a clinically relevant primer for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2016;36(5):1539–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hagopian T, Parelli J, Tran L, et al. A retrospective analysis of mandibular trauma radiology dictations. Oral Radiol. 2015;31:36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silvennoinen U, Iizuka T, Lindqvist C, Oikarinen K. Different patterns of condylar fractures: an analysis of 382 patients in a 3-year period. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(10):1032–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    MacLennan WD. Consideration of 180 cases of typical fractures of the mandibular condylar process. Br J Plast Surg. 1952;5:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoffman W, Taub PJ. Dentoalveolar fractures. In: Taub PJ, et al., editors. Ferraro’s fundamentals of maxillofacial surgery. New York: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Diagnostic and Interventional NeuroradiologyS. Camillo HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations