In this paper we make the point of the need to introduce a new concept, and the related term, to account for the dynamic nature of socio-technical systems and make this nature a primary concern of systems thinking to understand and intervene on this kind of systems: the cybork.
- Systems thinking
- Socio-technical systems
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Morphogenesis seems to be the “pillars of Hercules” of computational thinking, as also prominent figures like Alan Turing have considered it as a matter of study, with limited success .
Not necessarily enacted, but also only imagined by an agent.
If Nietzsche was among the first ones, Becker is probably among the latest ones, when he writes that “things are just people acting together” (p. 46) .
In his words: “[…] there is no being behind the doing, acting, becoming. The doer is merely made up and added into the action—the act is everything” (On the Genealogy of Morals, treatise I, 13, tr. W. Kaufmann).
The etimology of thing, i.e., a public assembly of people discussing “things of concerns” (from which it comes the metonymy by which the latter ones got the name of the former one) is a common place that we just hint at here.
Simply put, linguistic relativism states that the language by which we describe the world affects our interpretation of it.
cf. Goethe’s Botanical Writings, pp. 215–19, cited in .
“Cognates: Greek ergon “work,” orgia “religious performances;” Armenian gorc “work;” Avestan vareza “work, activity;” Gothic waurkjan, Old English wyrcan “to work,” Old English weorc “deed, action, something done;” Old Norse yrka “work, take effect”. Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001–2016 Douglas Harper.
The Greek word for machine, mechané, means “any artificial means or contrivance (i.e., device/arrangement/expedient) for doing a thing”: the machine cannot be decloupled from either its skillful use or the goal it is aimed at. Likewise, and differently from many mainstream translations of the treatise by Aristotle about machines, we translate its beginning as follows: “Remarkable things occur [not in accordance with nature but rather] along and beyond it [parà phýsin], which are produced through techne for the advantage of humanity […] whenever it is necessary to produce an effect [prâxai] beyond nature [parà phýsin]. […] Therefore we call that part of techne [méros tes téchnes] solving such difficulties, a machine.”
Here again we recall that to understand means “to stand in between” as if it were always possible, by discerning the relata from the relation itself.
Orig.: Der Wille zum System ist ein Mangel an Rechtschaffenheit. Götzen-Dämmerung, § 26,
In semiotics, the stance by the Russian semiologist Jurij Michajlovic̆ Lotman can be seen as an alternative perspective to the more traditional ones, both the Peircean and the Saussarian ones, and one strongly opposing any stance that sees the whole ontologically as sum of its parts.
“To do things, like certain inanimate objects,[not necessarily] knowing what they are doing, as, for instance, fire burns” Aristotle, Metaphysics, 981a–b.
Atkinson, C., & Brooks, L. (2005). In the Age of the Humanchine. ICIS 2005 Proceedings, 11, 123–135.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
Bard, J., & Lauder, I. (1974). How well does Turing’s theory of morphogenesis work? Journal of Theoretical Biology, 45(2), 501–531.
Barnett, G. A., & Thayer, L. (1997). Organizationâ€ communication, emerging perspectives V: The renaissance in systems thinking. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
Becker, H. S. (2008). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bednar, P. (2016). Complex methods of inquiry: structuring uncertainty (Doctoral dissertation, Lund University).
Bernstein, C. (1986). Living tissue/dead ideas. Social Text, 16, 124–135.
Bocchi, G., & Le, Varanini F. (2013). vie della formazione. Italy: Guerini e Associati. Milano.
Bowker, G. C., Baker, K., Millerand, F., & Ribes, D. (2009). Toward information infrastructure studies: Ways of knowing in a networked environment. In International handbook of internet research (pp. 97–117). Netherlands: Springer.
Cabitza, F. (2014). De-designing the IT artifact. Drafting small narratives for the coming of the socio-technical artifact. In ItAIS 2014, Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, Genova, Italy.
Canguilhem, G., Marrati, P., & Meyers, T. (2008). Knowledge of life. New York: Fordham University Press.
Ciborra, C. U., & Hanseth, O. (1998). From tool to Gestell: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure. Information Technology & People, 11(4), 305–327.
Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT press.
Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1960). Socio-technical systems, management sciences models and techniques (Vol. 2). London: UK.
Fallan, K. (2008). De-scribing design: Appropriating script analysis to design history. Design Issues, 24(4), 61–75.
Goethe, J. W., & Miller, G. L. (2009). The metamorphosis of plants. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Greenhalgh, T., & Stones, R. (2010). Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. Social Science & Medicine, 70(9), 1285–1294.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature Routledge. NY, USA: NYC.
Heidegger, M. (1954). The question concerning technology. Technology and Values: Essential Readings, 99–113.
Krarup, T. M., & Blok, A. (2011). Unfolding the social: quasiâ€ actants, virtual theory, and the new empiricism of Bruno Latour. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 42–63.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Hampshire: Oxford University Press.
Licklider, J. C. (1960). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, 1, 4–11.
Longo, G. O. (2005). Uomo e tecnologia: una simbiosi problematica. Mondo Digitale, 2, 5–18.
Lotman, J., & Clark, W. (2005). On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies, 33(1), 205–226.
Maturana, H. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9(3–4), 5–34.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.
Medina, E. (2006). Designing freedom, regulating a nation: Socialist cybernetics in Allende’s Chile. Journal of Latin American Studies, 38(03), 571–606.
Mumford, L. (1971). Technics and Human Development: The myth of the machine (Vol. I). Harvest Boo.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174–207.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24.
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (1992). Taking CSCW seriously. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 1(1–2), 7–40.
Seamon, D. (1998). Goethe’s way of science: A phenomenology of nature. New York: SUNY Press.
Senge P. M. (1999). The fifth discipline, the art & practice of the learning organization. Reprint 1999. London: Random House (1990).
Tenner, E. (2009). Our own devices: How technology remakes humanity. Vintage.
Varanini, F. (2009). Goethe: la conoscenza come morfogenesi. https://goo.gl/VXvWZe.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Woodward, J. (1965). Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London, VI: Oxford University Press.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cabitza, F., Varanini, F. (2018). Going Beyond the System in Systems Thinking: The Cybork. In: Rossignoli, C., Virili, F., Za, S. (eds) Digital Technology and Organizational Change. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62051-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62050-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62051-0