Skip to main content

The Emotional Engagement Paradox

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Customer Engagement Marketing

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to examine how customers’ word of mouth (WOM) behaviors differ based upon emotional engagement (EE) levels towards the brands they use in different industry categories. This research contributes to the engagement literature by providing new insight into the relationship between EE and WOM behaviors. Specifically, we examine how customers’ WOM behaviors relate to different levels of positive and negative EE. We find that high self-brand connection among consumers that are high in both positive and negative EE generates the most online WOM. We refer to this surprising relationship as the Emotional Engagement Paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Respondents were allowed to provide answers regarding up to two brands. As such, the cases are not entirely independent. So in addition to the one-way ANOVA tests (the assumptions of which are not entirely satisfied), we also ran mixed regression models, including respondent ID as a random effect and controlling for sector of the brand(s) rated. The results of the mixed models are substantively similar to the ANOVA tests with regard to the statistical significance of quadrant assignment. We present the significance test results of the ANOVA in Table 13.1 for simplicity sake. Averages in the table are calculated directly from the respondent-rating level data without any intermediate aggregation to the brand level (i.e. a brand rated by multiple respondents is included in the calculation of the quadrant average multiple times).

  2. 2.

    The highest mean repurchase intention was associated with high positive and negative EE instead of positive EE only. It should be noted that in both analyses, the mean repurchase intention levels were very close for the positive/negative EE quadrant and the positive-only EE quadrant. Additionally, “Posted negative comment about [company/brand] on forums/blogs (When asked)” and “Given a negative review about [company/brand] online (When asked)” appear in the no EE quadrant.

References

  • Berger, J. (2014). Word of Mouth and Interpersonal Communication: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, S. (2014). Loyalty Lost? Your Best Customers Are Cheating On You. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/mckinsey/2014/09/04/loyalty-lost-your-best-customers-are-cheating-on-you/#2760d4492e4b. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  • Cushion, D. (2016). Loyalty through Two Lenses: Part I: Are Your Loyal Customers Really Loyal? Cardlytics. http://www.cardlytics.com/blog/loyalty-two-lenses-part-loyal-customers-really-loyal/. Accessed 16 Nov 2016.

  • Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the Value of Electronic Word of Mouth and its Impact in Consumer Communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the Consumer: The Science and Art of the Value Creation Process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(2), 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation a Service System Perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiningham, T. L., Cooil, B., Malthouse, E. C., Lariviére, B., Buoye, A., Aksoy, L., & De Keyser, A. (2015). Perceptions are Relative: An Examination of the Relationship Between Relative Satisfaction Metrics and Share of Wallet. Journal of Service Management, 26(1), 2–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiningham, T. L., Rust, R. T., Lariviere, B., Aksoy, L. & Williams, L. (2016). A Comprehensive Roadmap for Driving Word of Mouth. Working Paper, St. Johns University, Queens, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What We Know and Don’t Know About Online Word-of-Mouth: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Aksoy, L., Donkers, B., Venkatesan, R., Wiesel, T., & Tillmanns, S. (2010). Undervalued or Overvalued Customers: Capturing Total Customer Engagement Value. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, E., & Mattila, A. S. (2015). The Effect of Self–Brand Connection and Self-Construal on Brand Lovers’ Word of Mouth (WOM). Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 56(4), 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladhari, R. (2007). The Effect of Consumption Emotions on Satisfaction and Word-of-Mouth Communications. Psychology & Marketing, 24(12), 1085–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of the Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslowska, E., Malthouse, E. C., & Collinger, T. (2016). The Customer Engagement Ecosystem. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5–6), 469–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1993). Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (2010). Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer (2nd ed.). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, A. (2010). Inside Gatorade’s Social Media Command Center. Mashable. http://mashable.com/2010/06/15/gatorade-social-media-mission-control/#oApMCw3pEkqs. Accessed 13 Nov 2016.

  • Park, C. W., MacInnis, D. J. & Priester, J. (2008). Brand Attachment: Constructs, Consequences and Causes. Foundations and Trends in Marketing Series, 1(3), Hanover, MA: Now Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, P., Yu, T., & De Ruyter, K. (2006). Understanding Customer Engagement in Services. Advancing Theory, Maintaining Relevance: Proceedings of ANZMAC 2006 Conference, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology, School of Advertising, Marketing and Public Relations, pp. 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P., & Hammond, K. (2004). The Relationship Between Customer Loyalty and Purchase Incidence. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wien, A. H., & Olsen, S. O. (2014). Understanding the Relationship between Individualism and Word of Mouth: A Self-Enhancement Explanation. Psychology & Marketing, 31(6), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, S., Hu, M., Winer, R., Assael, H., & Chen, X. (2012). An Empirical Study of Word-of-Mouth Generation and Consumption. Marketing Science, 31(6), 952–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aksoy, L., Keiningham, T.L., Buoye, A., Ball, J. (2018). The Emotional Engagement Paradox. In: Palmatier, R., Kumar, V., Harmeling, C. (eds) Customer Engagement Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61985-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics