Skip to main content

Engaging with Brands: The Influence of Dispositional and Situational Brand Engagement on Customer Advocacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Customer Engagement Marketing

Abstract

Branding research has explored the processes underlying consumers’ engagement with brands, with research exploring both dispositional and situational forms of engagement. Despite this work, scholars have yet to examine the relationship between dispositional and situational approaches to brand engagement. In the current chapter, we report the results of an empirical study testing the influence of dispositional brand engagement on customer advocacy (i.e., positive word-of-mouth and “Liking” on Facebook), as mediated through situational engagement with a specific brand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, P. (2004). The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, A. D., & Tasaki, L. H. (1992). The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1, 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H., & Walters, R. G. (1993). ‘The Effects of Perceived Justice on Complainants’ Negative Word-of-Mouth Behavior and Repatronage Intentions. Journal of Retailing, 69, 399–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (2012). The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D., Juric, B., & Ilic, A. (2011). Customer Engagement: Conceptual Domain, Fundamental Propositions, and Implications for Research. Journal of Service Research, 14, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer Engagement in a Virtual Brand Community: An Exploratory Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J., Malthouse, E. C., & Schaedel, U. (2009). An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Online Engagement and Advertising Effectiveness. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 23, 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., & Montgomery, D. B. (1999). Charting New Directions for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 63, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative Processing: Building Consumer Connections to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2003). You Are What They Eat: The Influence of Reference Groups on Consumers’ Connections to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 339–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guèvremont, A., & Grohmann, B. (2016). The Brand Authenticity Effect: Situational and Individual-Level Moderators. European Journal of Marketing, 50, 602–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halkias, G. (2015). ‘Mental Representation of Brands: A Schema-Based Approach to Consumers’ Organization of Market Knowledge. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 24, 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1996). The “Self Digest”: Self-Knowledge Serving Self-Regulatory Functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1062–1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T., & Scholer, A. A. (2009). Engaging the Consumer: The Science and Art of the Value Creation Process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Exploring Customer Brand Engagement: Definition and Themes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19, 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebeek, L. D., Glynn, M. S., & Brodie, R. J. (2014). Consumer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28, 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation a Service System Perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, J. E., & Lee, J. (2016). Brand Schematicity Moderates the Effect of Aesthetic Brands on Brand Accessories Purchase Intentions. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44, 1733–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. R., Matear, M., & Thomson, M. (2011). A Coal in the Heart: Self-Relevance as a Post-Exit Predictor of Consumer Anti-Brand Actions. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leckie, C., Nyadzayo, M. W., & Johnson, L. W. (2016). Antecedents of Consumer Brand Engagement and Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing Management, 32, 558–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sale. Harvard Business Review, 37, 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R. L., Sprott, D., Spangenberg, E., & Czellar, S. (2016). Consumer Preference for National vs. Private Brands: The Influence of Brand Engagement and Self-View, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, Politics, and MIS Implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships Between Bases of Power and Work Reactions: The Mediational Role of Procedural Justice. Journal of Management, 24, 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puligadda, S., Ross, W. T., Jr., & Grewal, R. (2012). Individual Differences in Brand Schematicity. Journal of Marketing Research, 49, 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sashi, C. M. (2012). Customer Engagement, Buyer-Seller Relationships, and Social Media. Management Decision, 50, 253–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solem, B. A. A., & Pedersen, P. E. (2016). The Role of Customer Brand Engagement in Social Media: Conceptualization, Measurement, Antecedents and Outcomes. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 10, 223–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009). The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. (2015). 8 Winning Habits of Social Media’s Top Brands. http://www.socialmediatoday.com/marketing/2015-03-19/8-winning-habits-social-medias-top-brands. Date Accessed 12 Feb 2017.

  • Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Park, C. W. (2005). The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a Transcending Conceptualization of Relationship: A Service-Dominant Perspective. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 24, 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P. C., Reinartz, W. J., & Krafft, M. (2010). Customer Engagement as a New Perspective in Customer Management. Journal of Service Research, 13, 247–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer Engagement: Exploring Customer Relationships Beyond Purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20, 122–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, F. E., Jr. (1992). The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Scale Items

Appendix: Scale Items

  1. 1)

    Brand Engagement in the Self-Concept (Sprott et al. 2009; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree)

    • I have a special bond with the brands that I like.

    • I consider my favorite brands to be a part of myself.

    • I often feel a personal connection between my brands and me.

    • Part of me is defined by important brands in my life.

    • I feel as if I have a close personal connection with the brands I most prefer.

    • I can identify with important brands in my life.

    • There are links between the brands that I prefer and how I view myself.

    • My favorite brands are an important indication of who I am.

  2. 2)

    Brand Schematicity (Puligadda et al. 2012; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree)

    • I couldn’t care less what brands people around me are using. (R)

    • Product features are more important than brand names in my buying decisions. (R)

    • When I go shopping, I am always scanning the environment for brand names.

    • Brands are not at all important to me. (R)

    • Brand name considerably influences my buying decisions.

    • I like to surround myself with recognizable brand names at home.

    • When I am considering products, the brand name is more important to me than any other information.

    • Brands are important to me because they indicate social status .

    • The brand name is the least important information to me when I am considering a product. (R)

    • I keep abreast of the brands people around me are using.

  1. 3)

    Situational Brand Engagement (Hollebeek et al. 2014; 1 = strongly disagree, 7 = strongly agree)

  • Cognition

    • Using “the brand” gets me to think about “the brand.

    • I think about “the brand” a lot when I’m using it.

    • Using “the brand” stimulates my interest to learn more about “the brand.

  • Affect

    • I feel very positive when I use “the brand.

    • Using “the brand” makes me happy.

    • I feel good when I use “the brand.

    • I’m proud to use “the brand.

  • Behavioral

    • I spend a lot of time using “the brand”, compared to other electronic brands.

    • Whenever I’m using electronic brands, I usually use “the brand.

    • The brand” is one of the brands I usually use when I use electronic brands.

  1. 4)

    Customer Advocacy (1 = extremely unlikely, 7 = extremely likely)

    • How likely would you be to “Like” “the brand’s” Facebook page?

    • Assuming your friend needs to purchase an electronics product, how likely is it that you would recommend that your friend buy from “the brand”?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, R.L., Sprott, D.E., Spangenberg, E.R., Czellar, S. (2018). Engaging with Brands: The Influence of Dispositional and Situational Brand Engagement on Customer Advocacy. In: Palmatier, R., Kumar, V., Harmeling, C. (eds) Customer Engagement Marketing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61985-9_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics