Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Specialized Methods in the Research of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fundamental Theories of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 259))

  • 1067 Accesses

Abstract

It has been previously emphasized that mega infrastructure construction management involves many fields, including politics, the economy, society, technology, and human disciplines, and that no management that masters the overall complexity of the management problems can emerge without the integration of the natural sciences, social sciences, and human disciplines. This fact suggests that different types of methods are demanded for solving management problems in mega infrastructure construction. Thus, the exploration and introduction of new methods directed by theoretical methodology of mega infrastructure construction management are required. Accordingly, four points must be emphasized:

  1. 1.

    Regarding the management problems of mega infrastructure construction, there is a group of problems concerned with engineering technology and natural laws that can be solved by quantitative methods that are widely used in other fields. However, people may also create and implement new quantitative methods in mega infrastructure construction management, but these methods are usually regarded as improvements of existing mature methods rather than new methods. In other words, in the theoretical research of mega infrastructure construction management, there are few completely new and unique quantitative systems. Therefore, there is no need to provide a list of these mature quantitative methods.

  2. 2.

    There are many qualitative methods in the theoretical field of mega infrastructure construction that are identical to those used in social science research. However, because the management problems of mega infrastructure construction have unique properties, there must be a class of new methods other than the ordinary quantitative methods that demonstrate this feature. Hence, the panoramic qualitative analysis is introduced.

  3. 3.

    In recent years, the information and computer technology field gains increasingly more weight in the research of mega infrastructure construction management. For example, technologies such as computer simulations and computational experiments provide new means for the managerial activities to reconstruct and discover scenarios. In particular, it provides new methods to characterize and describe the complex wholeness of management problems, which cannot be achieved using the traditional quantitative and qualitative methods. Therefore, scenarios farming is selected as a new typical method to illustrate.

  4. 4.

    Models must be built that represent the entirety of the managerial activities in mega infrastructure construction. The models must be of various complexities, and they must conceptualize, to some degree, the active entity and refine the essential property of the active entity at a theoretical level. This is the process of mega infrastructure construction management modeling. Based on the integration of current advanced modeling thinking, especially that based on information technology, and on the reflection of the complex wholeness of mega infrastructure construction, the new method of federation modeling is introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the calculation of per capita GDP data in dollars from 1990 to 2014.

References

  • Azhar, S. (2011). Building information modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity – A review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(4), 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banuls, V. A., Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (2013). Collaborative scenario modeling in emergency management through cross-impact. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9), 1756–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BaÅ¡karada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerik-Gerber, B., Jazizadeh, F., Li, N., & Calis, G. (2011). Application areas and data requirements for BIM-enabled facilities management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(3), 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltratti, A., Consiglio, A., & Zenios, S. A. (1999). Scenario modeling for the management of international bond portfolios. Annals of Operations Research, 85, 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnholt, M., & Farstad, G. R. (2012). Am I rambling? On the advantages of interviewing couples together. Qualitative Research, 14(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011a). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (technical, organizational and environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 728–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Jongkind, Y., Mooi, H., Bakker, H., & Verbraeck, A. (2011b). Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 728–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, C., & Girmscheid, G. (2008). The inherent complexity of large scale engineering projects. Project Perspective, 22–26. https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/handle/20.500.11850/69644/eth-800-01.pdf

  • Brown, T., Beyeler, W., & Barton, D. (2004). Assessing infrastructure interdependencies: The challenge of risk analysis for complex adaptive systems. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 1(1), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, X. (1996). Qualitative research method in social sciences in China. Social Sciences in China, 6, 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. [请核对次文献].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmann, J. S., Fujimoto, R. M., & Weatherly, R. M. (1997, December). The department of defense high level architecture. In Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation (pp. 142–149). IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmann, J. S., Fujimoto, R. M., & Weatherly, R. M. (1998, December). The DoD high level architecture: an update. In Simulation Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 797–804). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Z. J., & Hou, C. Z. (2005). The development example of distributed interactive simulation system based on HLA. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 1(1), 106–109. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducot, C., & Lubben, H. J. (1980). A typology for scenarios. Futures, 12(1), 15–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C. M. (1999). Building product models: Computer environments, supporting design and construction. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J., Gideon, K., & Stephen, B. (2004). Beach time, bridge time and billable hours: The temporal structure of temporal contracting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B., Mette, K., Skamris, H., & Soren, L. B. (2002). Underestimating cost in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godet, M., & Roubelat, F. (1996). Creating the future: The use and misuse of scenarios. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 164–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, J. L., Teng, J. Y., Wu, X. G., Cao, J., & Yan, Y. (2012). Study on the collaborative management technique of IPD construction project based on building information modeling. Construction Technology, 22, 75–79. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Q. H., Qian, L. L., Duan, Y. F., & Li, Y. K. (2012). Current situation and barriers of BIM implementation. Journal of Engineering Management, 1, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Q., Luo, L., Hu, Y., & Chan, A. P. (2014). Measuring the complexity of mega infrastructure construction projects in China – A fuzzy analytic network process analysis. International Journal of Project Management. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.07.009.

  • Hu, X. X., & Minghui, R. (2012). The robust decision-making method for corporate strategic decision-making. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 20, 659–663. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Building Science, United states national building information modeling standard, version 1-part 1[EB/OL]. http://buildingsmartalliance.org

  • Ishida, T. Q. (2002). A scenario description language for interactive agents. IEEE Computer, 35(11), 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, H., & Wiener, A. (1967). The year 2000. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhl, F., Weatherly, R., & Dahmann, J. (1999). Creating computer simulation systems: An introduction to the high level architecture. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall PTR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, F., & Wen, Y. (1997). Mathematical model and mathematical modeling. Beijing Normal University Publishing House. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laiserin, J. (2002). Comparing pommes and naranjas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifler, O., & Eriksson, H. (2012). Analysis tools in the study of distributed decision-making: A meta-study of command and control research. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Guo, H. L., Huang, T., Chen, J. Y., & Chen, J. J. (2010). Research on the application architecture of BIM in building projects. Journal of Engineering Management, 24(5), 525–529. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X. Y. (2015). Revised analytic induction and constant comparative method: Approaches to qualitative research. Peking University Education Review, 13(1), 16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Q., & Wang, J. P. (2010). The research on building lifecycle management based on the technology of BIM. Journal of Information Technology in Civil Engineering and Architecture, 3, 40–45. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loseke, D. R., & Cahil, S. E. (2007). Publishing qualitative manuscripts: Lessons learned. In Qualitative research practice: Concise paperback edition (pp. 491–506). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z. L., Zhang, D. D., & Ma, J. K. (2014). BIM-based collaborative work model and information utilization framework for IPD the projects. Journal of Tong Ji University (Natural Science), 42(9), 1325–1332. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (2006). A tale of two cultures: Contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14, 227–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Mendes, W. B., & Dovidio, J. F. (2013). Intergroup relations and health disparities: A social psychological perspective. Health Psychology, 32(5), 514–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masera, M., & Wilkens, M. (2001). Interdependencies with the information infrastructure: dependability and complexity issues. The Fifth International Conference on Technology, Policy and Innovation, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morning, A. (2008). Reconstructing race in science and society: Biology textbooks. American Journal of Sociology, 1952–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. L., Murphy, J., & Muir, J. (2010). Public management and complexity theory: Richer decision-making in public service. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2002). Personal communication. 25 July, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarjoughian, H., & Zeigler, B. P. (2000). DEVS and HLA. Transaction of the Society for Computer Simulation, 17(4), 187–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain world. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, Z. H., You, Z. Q., Chen, S. P., & Yao, B. (2009). Sutong bridge engineering system analysis and management system. Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y. (2013). Qualitative research method and Chinese sociology. The Journal of Humanities, 4, 101–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, T., & Linnhoff-Popien, C. (2004, September). A context modeling survey. In Workshop Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y. J., Cai, Z. J., & Yu, W. (2005). The mathematical model. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, G., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & F. (2015). Exploring new pathway of management: Qualitative research methods in business anthropology. Chinese Journal of Management, 12(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Notten, P., & Rotmans, J. (2001). The future of scenarios. Scenario and Strategy Planning, 1(3), 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F. W. (2015). Generalization strategies of qualitative research. Peking University Education Review, 13(1), 40–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. H., Zhang, D. Q., Gu, T., & Pung, H. K. (2004, March). Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on (pp. 18–22). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinan, E. (2011). Principles of multiscale modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinan, E., & Engquist, B. (2003). Multiscale modeling and computation. Notices of the AMS, 50(9), 1062–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, R. (2008). Innovations in the planning of mega-projects, decision making on mega-projects. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, P. A., Burger, A. G., & Hoare, P. (2000). Advanced distributed simulation: A review of developments and their implication for data collection and analysis. Simulation Practice and Theory, 8(3), 201–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, P. J. (2000). Behavior and scenario modeling for real-time virtual environments. Doctoral dissertation: The University of Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T. M. (1999). The need for new paradigms for complex projects. International Journal of Project Management, 17(5), 269–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia, W., & Lee, G. (2004). Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y. X., Wang, Y. W., & Yao, B. (2010). Study on the construction project IPD collaborative management based on building information model. China Civil Engineering Journal, 44(12), 138–143. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, L. H. (2003). Enterprise: The contract organization which produces products traded independently. Social Sciences in Xinjiang, 3, 18–27. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yessios, C. I. (2004). Are we forgetting design. AECbytes Viewpoint, 10. http://www.aecbytes.com/viewpoint/2004/issue_10.html

  • Zhang, R. Y., Wang, J. (2012). The implication of building information modeling (BIM). Industrial Building, S1:34–36 + 43. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Wang, H., Chen, D., & Zacharewicz, G. (2010). A model-driven approach to multidisciplinary collaborative simulation for virtual product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(2), 167–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. P., Li, D., Lin, J. R., & Yan, G. W. (2012). Application of BIM in engineering construction. Construction Technology, 371(41), 10–17. (Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Q. Y., Guo, Y. M., Wang, N., Xue, H. F., Cui, L., & Wang, Y. Z. (2012). Research on unconventional emergency scenario model based on knowledge element. Information Science, 1, 024.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management & Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China

    Zhaohan Sheng

Authors
  1. Zhaohan Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheng, Z. (2018). Specialized Methods in the Research of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management. In: Fundamental Theories of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61974-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation