Skip to main content

The Formation Path of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1025 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 259))

Abstract

According to the author’s understanding, developing a mega infrastructure construction management theory (system) is a complex project that involves the building of a knowledge system and then the promotion of that system. The core task is to adhere to the general rules for developing a theory, consider the essential elements of the theory and their logical relations with one another as the foundation, and then design and transform the theory (system) into a structure. During this process, it is necessary to identify the principles of thinking behind the theory system, the essential theoretical elements, the concepts and fundamentals that can be derived from these elements and concepts by logical judgment, and the basic abstractions that can be further extracted from the fundamentals of mega infrastructure construction. To form basic abstractions means to develop basic scientific questions. Although each of these steps is relatively independent of the others, they are logically related to the others. As a result, a complete structure of a theory (system) can be developed as follows: principles of thinking (category theory), substantial concepts, fundamental principles, and scientific questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Forsberg, K., Mooz, H., & Cotterman, H. (2005). Visualizing project management: Models and frameworks for mastering complex systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giezen, M. (2012). Keeping it simple? A case study into the advantages and disadvantages of reducing complexity in mega project planning. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 781–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, J., & Wang, M. (2008). Philosophy thinking on engineering and engineering management. Engineering Science, 10(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, W. (2001). The meaning, characteristics and forms of the management of complex organizations. Journal of Systemic Dialectics, 9(4), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1979). Metaphor in science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 409–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C. E., & Ghahramani, Z. (2001). Occam's razor. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 13, 294–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salet, W., Bertolini, L., & Giezen, M. (2013). Complexity and uncertainty: Problem or asset in decision making of mega infrastructure projects? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(6), 1984–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, P. (2014). The “top-level design” in the theory of engineering philosophy field of vision. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 30(4), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A. (2015). Project management in construction. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Cheng, S. (2009). The system complexity of large-scale construction project. Scientific Decision Making, 1, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L. (2005). The systematic character of terms and terminology. Chinese Science and Technology Terms Journal, 7(2), 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Du, G. (2001). Foundations of management science (Vol. 9). Tianjin: Tianjin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C. (2001). On the humanities and social sciences theory thinking and engineering thinking arrogation. Tianjin Social Sciences, 2, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, T., Sheng, Z., & Li, J. (2008). Complex engineering management system based on metasynthsis. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 5(3), 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, Y., Ren, H., & Fan, G. (2009). Complexity analysis and complexity management of large scale construction project system. Science and Technology Management Research, 6, 303–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheng, Z. (2018). The Formation Path of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management Theory. In: Fundamental Theories of Mega Infrastructure Construction Management. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 259. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61974-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics