Service as Entropy Reduction: A Conceptualization of Service for Sustainable Coexistence

Chapter
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

Service is ubiquitous. It is a fundamental activity in human coexistence. However, many people are unaware that natural and ecological systems provide service as well. For example, 30% of the food consumed by humans depend on natural services, in particular on the pollination by insects. Clean water is preserved by natural water cycles. Human intentions, interests or desires can obviously not explain the existence of all these different kinds of service. They would exist without humans on earth. Consequently, our understanding of service has to be much broader than just including man-made service. This chapter proposes a conceptualization of service as a fundamental process of coexistence particularly the coexistence of humans, and more important, the coexistence of humans together with nature. Today, humans’ ecological footprint on earth results in a resource overshoot already in August. On August 8, 2016, we had used as much from nature as our planet can renew in the whole year. We need a better conceptualization of our coexistence on this planet. Humans cannot survive if they destroy the resources they need. However, the planet can survive without humans. Service is proposed and conceptualized here as an integrated concept for a mutual coexistence of humans together with nature. Once we understand the cyclic intertwinement of human and natural activities, humans can adjust their life to natural cycles without reducing quality of life.

Keywords

Service Resources Exchange-change process Entropy reduction Ecology 

References

  1. Akaka, M. A., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 12(3), 367–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballantyne, D., & Varey, R. J. (2006). Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: The exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berghman, L., Matthyssens, P., & Vandenbempt, K. (2006). Building competences for new customer value creation: an exploratory study: Creating value for the customer through competence-based marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaser, M. J., & Atherton, J. C. (2004). Helicobacter pylori persistence: Biology and disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 113(3), 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boucher, D. H. (Ed.). (1985a). The biology of mutualism – Ecology and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boucher, D. H. (1985b). The idea of mutualism. In D. H. Boucher (Ed.), The biology of mutualism – Ecology and evolution (pp. 1–28). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boyd, J., & Banzhaf, S. (2007). What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63(2–3), 616–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandler, J. D., & Vargo, S. L. (2011). Contextualization and value-in-context. How context frames exchange. Marketing Theory, 11(1), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor, R. C. (1995). The benefits of mutualism: A conceptual framework. Biological Reviews, 70(3), 427–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cushman, J. H., & Whitham, T. G. (1991). Competition mediating the dynamics of a mutualism: Protective services of ants as a limiting resource for membracids. The American Naturalist, 138, 851–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas, A. E. (1994). Symbiotic interactions. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, A. E. (2010). The symbiotic habit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Echeverri, P., & Skalén, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eigen, M., & Schuster, P. (1979). The hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fromm, H., & Cardoso, J. (2015). Foundations. In J. Cardoso, H. Fromm, S. Nickel, G. Satzger, R. Studer, & C. Weinhardt (Eds.), Fundamentals of service systems, service science: Research and innovations in the service economy (pp. 1–32). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Golfetto, F., & Gibbert, M. (2006). Marketing competencies and the sources of customer value in business markets: Creating value for the customer through competence-based marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(8), 904–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herre, E., Knowlton, N., Mueller, U., & Rehner, S. (1999). The evolution of mutualisms: Exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14(2), 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, T. P. (1977). On goods and services. Review of Income and Wealth, (4), 315–338.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, T. P. (1999). Tangibles, intangibles and services: A new taxonomy for the classification of output. The Canadian Journal of Economics, (2), 426–446.Google Scholar
  20. Janzen, D. H. (1985). The natural history of mutualism. In D. H. Boucher (Ed.), The biology of mutualism – Ecology and evolution (pp. 40–99). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kiers, E. T., & Denison, R. F. (2008). Sanctions, cooperation, and the stability of plant-rhizosphere mutualisms. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39(1), 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiers, E. T., Palmer, T. M., Ives, A. R., Bruno, J. F., & Bronstein, J. L. (2010). Mutualisms in a changing world: An evolutionary perspective. Ecology Letters, 13(12), 1459–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. King, S. F., & Burgess, T. F. (2008). Understanding success and failure in customer relationship management. Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 421–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology Letters, 8(5), 468–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lefebvre, I., & Plé, L. (2011). Emergence of value co-destruction in B2B context. Paper presented at the Naples Forum on Service 2011, Vol. 2011.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, D. H. (1985). Symbiosis and Mutualism: Crisp concepts and soggy semantics. In D. H. Boucher (Ed.), The biology of mutualism – Ecology and evolution (pp. 20–39). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Löbler, H. (2013). Service-dominant networks. Journal of Service Management, 24(4), 420–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Löbler, H., & Lusch, R. F. (2014). Signs and practices as resources in IT-related service innovation. Service Science, 6(3), 190–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. C. (2008). Fundamentals of Service Science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maglio, P. P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J. T., & Spohrer, J. (2006). Service systems, service science, SSME, and innovation. Communications for the ACM, 49(7), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ngo, L. V., & O’Cass, A. (2009). Creating value offerings via operant resource-based capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noe, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1995). Biological markets. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ollerton, J. (2006). Biological Barter: Patterns of specialization compared across different mutualists. In N. M. Waser & J. Ollerton (Eds.), Plant-pollinator interactions – From specialization to generalization (pp. 411–435). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., Brown, S. W., Burkhard, K. A., Goul, M., Smith-Daniels, V., & Rabinovich, E. (2010). Moving forward and making a difference: Research priorities for the science of service. Journal of Service Research, 13(1), 4–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paszkowski, U. (2006). A journey through signaling in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses. New Phytologist, 172(1), 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peters, L. D., Lobler, H., Brodie, R. J., Breidbach, C. F., Hollebeek, L. D., Smith, S. D., Sorhammar, D., & Varey, R. J. (2014). Theorizing about resource integration through service-dominant logic. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Plé, L., & Chumpitaz, R. (2010). Not always co-creation: Introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prigogine, I., & Leferver, R. (1968). Symmetry breaking instabilities in Dissipative Systems. II. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 48(4), 1695–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prigogine, I., & Nicolis, G. (1967). On symmetry-breaking instabilities in dissipative systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 46(9), 3542–3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramaswamy, V. (2011). It’s about human experiences…and beyond, to co-creation. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 195–196. (Special issue on service-dominant logic in business markets).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ranganathan, J., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Lucas, N., Irwin, F., Zurek, M., Karen Bennett, K., Ash, N., & West, P. (2008). Ecosystem services – A guide for decision makers. World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Redman, R. S., Dunigan, D. D., & Rodriguez, R. J. (2001). Fungal symbiosis: From mutualism to parasitism, who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytologist, 15, 705–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riddle, D. L. (1986). Service-led growth. The role of the service sector in world development. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  45. Sampson, S. E. (2010). The unified service theory. A paradigm for service science. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science, service science: Research and innovations in the service economy. Boston, MA: Springer US.Google Scholar
  46. Schopenhauer, A., & Ebeling, H. (1978–1979). Die beiden Grundprobleme der Ethik: Behandelt in 2 akad. Preisschr, Philosophische Bibliothek, Bd. 305–306, Meiner, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  47. Schrödinger, E. (1944). What is life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sethna, J. P. (2011). Entropy, order parameters, and complexity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  49. Shannon, C. E. (1949/1998). The mathematical theory of communication. In C. E. Shannon & W. Weaver (Eds.), The mathematical theory of communication (pp. 29–125). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  50. Spohrer, J. (2009). Service science and systems science: Perspectives on social value. Institute of Technology, Tokyo. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the 21st Century COE Program “Creation of Agent-Based Social Systems Sciences” (pp. 9–33).Google Scholar
  51. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. (2010). Toward a science of service systems – Value and symbols. In P. P. Maglio, Ch. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 157–194). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Starr, M. P. (1975). A generalized scheme for classifying organismic Associations. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 29, 1–20.Google Scholar
  53. Straathof, S. M. (2007). Shannon’s entropy as an index of product variety. Economics Letters, 94(2), 297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-domiant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(2), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all Be2B…And beyond: Towards a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F., & Akaka, M.A. (2010). Advancing service science with service dominant logic – Clarifications and conceptual development. In P. P. Maglio, C. A. Kieliszewski, & J. C. Spohrer (Eds.), Handbook of service science (pp. 133–156). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26(3), 145–152.Google Scholar
  59. West, S. A., Griffin, A. S., & Gardner, A. (2007). Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Current Biology, 17, R661–R672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamamura, N., Higashi, M., Behera, N., & Wakano, J. Y. (2004). Evolution of mutualism through spatial effects. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 226, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zimmermann, E. (1951). World resources and industries (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Service and Relationship ManagementLeipzigGermany

Personalised recommendations