Advertisement

Innovation Policies: Strategy of Growth in a Complex Perspective

Chapter
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to highlight new understandings of innovation as an interactive process in relation to economic growth. The resulting ideas could be of considerable interest to innovation policy makers. Two impacts are of considerable potential importance. The first relates to the absorption of complex and evolutionary systems dynamics ideas into the study of innovation, and growth. The second relates to the synthesis of complex systems ideas with evolutionary models of innovation, and growth. Considering innovation as a complex multi-level process means that it is not possible to devise the context into independent ways and that it is not enough to provide policymakers with simple solutions, but it should help them formulate and address questions that are appropriate to the evolutionary and complex context within which they operate.

Keywords

Innovation Complex systems Policy making 

References

  1. Aghion, P. (2005). Handbook of economic growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (2009). The economics of growth theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Archibugi, D. (2000). The globalisation of technology and the European innovation system, Prepared as part of the project “Innovation Policy in a Knowledge-Based Economy” Commissioned by the European Commission.Google Scholar
  4. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barile, S. (Ed.). (2000). Contributi sul pensiero sistemico. Salerno: Arnia.Google Scholar
  6. Barile, S. (2008). L’impresa come Sistema – Contributi sull’Approccio Sistemico Vitale (II ed.). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  7. Barile, S. (2009). Management Sistemico Vitale. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  8. Barile, S., Polese, F., & Saviano, M. (2012). Immaginare L’Innovazione. Giappichelli Ed, Torino.Google Scholar
  9. BIS-Department for Business Innovation and Skills. (2011). Innovation and research strategy for growth. BIS Economics Paper, no. 15. http://bis.gov.uk/innovatingforgrowth
  10. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydersdoff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of University-Industry-Government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, M. M. (2002). A systemic approach to innovation in regional development reconsidered Part A (pp. 15–31). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems-complementarities and economic growth. Research Policy, 31, 191–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frenken, K. (2016). A complexity-theoretic perspective on innovation policy (ISU Working Paper #16.01).Google Scholar
  15. Golinelli, G. M. (2000). L’approccio Sistemico al Governo dell’Impresa – L’Impresa Sistema Vitale (I ed.). Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  16. Golinelli, G. M. (2005). L’approccio Sistemico al Governo dell’Impresa. – L’Impresa Sistema Vitale (II ed.). Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  17. Golinelli, G. M. (2010). Viable systems approach (VSA). Governing business dynamics. Padova: Kluwer CEDAM.Google Scholar
  18. Iizuka, M.. (2013). Innovation systems framework: Still useful in the new global context? (UNU-MERIT Working Papers 2013-005).Google Scholar
  19. Kline, S., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In Landau et al. (Eds.), The positive sum strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lane, D. A., & Maxfield, R. (1997). Foresight complexity and strategy. In W. B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, & D. A. Lane (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system II. Redwood City, CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  21. Lane, D. A., & Maxfield, R. (2005). Ontological uncertainty and innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 6, 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. List, F. (1841). The national system of political economy (S. Sampson & M.P. Lloyd, Trans., 1885 ed., Fourth Book, “The politics”, Chapter 33).Google Scholar
  23. Llerena, P., & Matt, M. (1999). Technological cooperation and dynamic performance of industries: Towards an evolutionary foundation of technology policies. Communication to European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics 7–9 June, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  24. Ludvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1992). National systems of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  25. Mani, S. (2001). Role of government in promoting innovation, an international comparative study. In Paper presented to the Conference “The Future of Innovation Studies Eidhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands 20–23 September.Google Scholar
  26. Metcalfe, J. S. (1994). Evolution, technology, policy and technology management. Prometheus, 12, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Metcalfe, S. (1995). The Economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Metcalfe, J. S., Fonseca, M. D., & Ramlogan, R. (2000). Innovation, growth and competition: ESRC Centre for research on innovation & competition. In Paper prepared for the Complexity and Complex Systems in Industry Conference 19th 20th September, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
  29. Nelson, R. R. (1988). Institutions supporting technical change in the United States. In G. Dosi, C. Freemann, R. R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 312–329). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  30. Nelson, R. R., & Nelson, K. (2002). Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Research Policy, 31, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (1997). National Innovation Policy. Paris: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf
  32. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Shulin, G. (1999). Implication of National Innovation Systems for developing countries managing change and complexity in economic development (UNU/INTECH Discussion Papers ISSN 1564-8370).Google Scholar
  35. Smith K., (1991). Innovation policy in an evolutionary context. In J. S. Metcalfe (Ed.), Evolutionary theories of economic and technological change. London: Harwood.Google Scholar
  36. Solow, M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Robert M. Solow. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Verspagen, B. (2001). Economic growth and technological change: An evolutionary interpretation (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2001/01). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations