Advertisement

A Journey Through Possible Views of Relational Logic

  • Marco Pellicano
  • Maria V. Ciasullo
  • Orlando Troisi
  • Gian Luca Casali
Chapter
Part of the New Economic Windows book series (NEW)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how the relational logic is one of the most interesting and profitable management paradigms to understand firms’ behaviour and to foster value co-creation processes.

The relational view and the resulting relational inter-subjective dynamics are critical success factors for corporate governance capable to mobilise different involved actors’ resources. However, the importance of a system perspective of relational dynamics is only recently discussed in the current doctrinal debate. Therefore, our goal is to contribute in bridging this gap by reinterpreting, in a system key, the issue of relations. Methodologically, the authors have carried out a review taking a system vision, in order to conceptualize an original interpretative model. The interpretative model that we call “Enterprise Relational Vision” (ERV) is based on the following assumptions (pillars): Relationality and autopoiesis, Dissemination and definition, Sense and cohesion, Training and decision formulation, Co-creation and regeneration, Resources and competitiveness, Leadership and viability.

Keywords

Relational logic System view Stakeholders Value creation 

References

  1. Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  2. Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barile, S., Spohrer, J., & Polese, F. (2010). Editorial column – System thinking for service research advances. Service Science, 2(1–2), i–iii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barnard, C. I. (1939). Dilemmas of leadership in the democratic process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary unity [Trad. it. (1984). Mente e natura. Un’unità necessaria]. Milano: Adelphi.Google Scholar
  7. Beer, S. (1989). The viable system model. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of services marketing (pp. 25–28). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  9. Bonomi, A., & Rullani, E. (2005). Il capitalismo personale: vite al lavoro. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  10. Brunetti, F. (1997). Sull’architettura delle relazioni tra impresa e ambiente. Problemi di gestione dell’impresa, 23.Google Scholar
  11. Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2004). Economia civile. Efficienza, equità, felicità pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  12. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Casali, G. L., Franco, E., & Perano, M. (2016). Strategic management. Growing into a foreign market. Prahran: Tilde Publishing and Distribution.Google Scholar
  14. Ciasullo, M. V. (2010). La competitività. In M. Pellicano & M. V. Ciasullo (Eds.), La visione strategica dell’impresa. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  15. Della Piana, B. (2010). L’analisi strategica. In M. Pellicano & M. V. Ciasullo (Eds.), La visione strategica dell’impresa. Torino: G. Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  16. Donati, P. (2004). Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, È. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  18. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 4, 660–679.Google Scholar
  19. Fabris, G. (2008). Societing: il marketing nella società postmoderna. Milano: Egea.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Business in the 21st century. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Golinelli, G. M. (2010). Viable systems approach: Governing business dynamics. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  22. Grönroos, C. (1983). Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Helsingfors, Helsinky: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  23. Grönroos, C. (1991). The marketing strategy continuum: A marketing concept for the 1990s. Management Decision, 29(1), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grönroos, C., & Gummesson, E. (1985). The Nordic school of service marketing. Service Marketing–Nordic School Perspectives. Stockholm University, 6–11.Google Scholar
  25. Gummesson, E. (2002). Total relationship marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  26. Gummesson, E. (2004). From one-to-one to many-to-many marketing. In Service Excellence in Management: Interdisciplinary Contributions, Proceedings from the QUIS 9 Symposium, Karlstad University Karlstad, Sweden, 16–25.Google Scholar
  27. Gummesson, E., & Polese, F. (2009). B2B is not an island! Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods an interaction approach. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: International Thomson.Google Scholar
  30. Hobbs, T. (1954). Leviathan, or the matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiastical and civil. London: Andrew Crooke (1651).Google Scholar
  31. Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  32. Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Gustafsson, A. (2016). Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2957–2963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., & Frenk, S. (1985). Autopoiesi e cognizione: La realizzazione del vivente. Venezia: Marsilio Editori.Google Scholar
  36. Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1-2), 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mintzberg, H. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nahapaiet, J. E., & Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–246.Google Scholar
  40. Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1994). Designing interactive strategy. Chichester: Wyley, (trad. it.) Le strategie interattive d’impresa, Etas, Milano, 1995.Google Scholar
  41. Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1998). Designing interactive strategy: From value chain to value constellation. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Pardi, F. (1998). Teoria dei Sistemi, in Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali (VIII, ed., pp. 19–26). Roma: Istituto Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
  43. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press (trad. it.) Il sistema sociale, Edizioni Comunità, Milano, 1965.Google Scholar
  44. Pellicano, M. (1992). La comunicazione aziendale nelle imprese di servizi pubblici. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  45. Pellicano, M. (1994). Sistemi di Management. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar
  46. Pellicano, M. (2002). Il governo delle relazioni nei sistemi vitali socio-economici (n. 13). Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  47. Pellicano, M. (2004). (a cura di) Il governo strategico dell’impresa. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  48. Pellicano, M. (2005). Il governo delle relazioni d’impresa. Sinergie, 21.Google Scholar
  49. Pellicano, M., & Perano, M. (2007). Esposito De Falco, S.: Analysis of the relational capital devaluation risks within the organization. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference Society for Global Business & Economic Development (SGBED). Kyoto, 8–11 August 2007.Google Scholar
  50. Pels, J., Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., & Carrubbo, L. (2014). The contribution of VSA and SDL perspectives to strategic thinking in emerging economies. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
  52. Reficco, E., & Vernis, A. (2010). Market ecosystem and social inclusion. In P. Márquez, E. Reficco, & G. Berger (Eds.), Socially inclusive business in Iberoamerica: Challenges and opportunities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rullani, E. (1989). La teoria dell’impresa: soggetti, sistemi, evoluzione. In M. Rispoli (Ed.), L’impresa industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  54. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.Google Scholar
  56. Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2000). Handbook of relationship marketing. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Computer, 40(1), 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spohrer, J., Anderson, J. L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2008). Service science and service dominant logic. Otago Forum, 2, 4–18.Google Scholar
  60. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  61. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vicari, S. (1991). L’impresa vivente. Milano: Etas Libri.Google Scholar
  64. Vicari, S., Bertoli, G., & Busacca, B. (2000). Il valore delle relazioni di mercato. Nuove prospettive nelle analisi delle performance aziendali. Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 5, 7–53.Google Scholar
  65. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. Foundation development, application. New York: Penguin University Books.Google Scholar
  66. Weick, K. E. (1968). Systematic observational methods. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 357–451.Google Scholar
  67. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2012). Toward a service (eco) systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(3), 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or, Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Pellicano
    • 1
  • Maria V. Ciasullo
    • 1
  • Orlando Troisi
    • 1
  • Gian Luca Casali
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business Science – Management and Innovation SystemsUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.School of ManagementQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbane CityAustralia

Personalised recommendations