Understanding Needs, Identifying Opportunities: ICT in the View of Universal Design

  • Ilaria Garofolo
  • Eric Medvet
  • Fulvio Babich
  • Giovanni Ramponi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 195)


This article provides food for thoughts elaborated by peer researchers who, basing on their studies and on current literature on relationships between Universal Design (UD) and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), wish to share few key issues related to the challenges offered by the involvement of final users in designing product and services. Referring to approaches from different disciplines, key questions will be highlighted on which a debate could start, focused on the issue of promoting inclusion and how a close relationship among these different areas of knowledge can contribute to bridge the gap between the potential of new technologies and the real and diversified need by persons. Thus, actively contributing toward the empowerment of the community of belonging.


Accessibility Usability Design for All Inclusive and Universal Design Internet of Things 


  1. 1.
    Hendricks, A.: UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Eur. J. Health L. 14, 273 (2007). http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Technical report, World Health Organization (2001). http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
  3. 3.
    Deloitte: Study on the socio-economic impact of new measures to improve accessibility of goods and services for people with disabilities (2014). http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=14842
  4. 4.
    Eurostat: Healthy life years statistics. Technical report, Eurostat (2016). http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Healthy_life_years_statistics
  5. 5.
    Drummond, M.F., Sculpher, M.J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G.L., Torrance, G.W.: Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health care Programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Murray, C.J., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A.D., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J.A., Abdalla, S., et al.: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 380(9859), 2197–2223 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    W3C-WAI: Introduction to Web Accessibility. Technical report, Web Accessibility Initiative (2005). https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php
  8. 8.
    Henry, S.L., Abou-Zahra, S., Brewer, J.: The role of accessibility in a universal web. In: Proceedings of the 11th Web for all Conference, p. 17. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen, J., Loranger, H.: Prioritizing Web Usability. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arenghi, A., Garofolo, I., Lauría, A.: On the relationship between “Universal” and “Particular” in architecture. In: Universal Design 2016: Learning from the Past, Designing for the Future, pp. 31–39. IOS Press (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brynn, R.: Universal design and standardisation-can user participation be standardized? In: Universal Design 2014: Three Days of Creativity and Diversity: Proceedings of the International Conference on Universal Design, UD 2014 Lund, Sweden, 16–18 June 2014, vol. 35, p. 307. IOS Press (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hedvall, P.O.: I have never been universal. In: Reklamebyrå, H.K. (ed.) Trends in Universal Design. Lund University Press, Lund (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Page, S.E.: Making the difference: applying a logic of diversity. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 21(4), 6–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nathan, E.: Gartner: 21 Billion IoT Devices to Invade by 2020. Technical report (2015). http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/gartner-21-billion-iot-devices-to-invade-by-2020/d/d-id/1323081
  15. 15.
    STM32 Open Development Environment (2015). http://www.st.com/STM32ODE
  16. 16.
    Weiss, J., Yu, R.: Wireless Sensor Networking for the Industrial Internet of Things. Technical report, Linear Technology white paper WP007f (2015). http://www.linear.com/docs/47097
  17. 17.
    ISO: International standards and “private standards”. Technical report, ISO: International Organization for Standardization (2010). http://www.iso.org/iso/private_standards.pdf
  18. 18.
    Jakobs, K., Wagner, T., Reimers, K.: Standardising the internet of things: what the experts think. Int. J. IT Stan. Stand. Res. (IJITSR) 9(1), 63–67 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McLoughlin, E.: Inclusive design: manufacturing, design, and retail expert views. Technical report (2016). http://www.pocklington-trust.org.uk/project/inclusive-design-manufacturing-design-retail-experts-views/
  20. 20.
    Domingo, M.C.: An overview of the internet of things for people with disabilities. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 35(2), 584–596 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mikołajewska, E., Mikołajewski, D.: Integrated IT environment for people with disabilities: a new concept. Open Med. 9(1), 177–182 (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kranenburg, R., Stembert, N., Moreno, M.V., Skarmeta, A.F., López, C., Elicegui, I., Sánchez, L.: Co-creation as the key to a public, thriving, inclusive and meaningful EU IoT. In: Hervás, R., Lee, S., Nugent, C., Bravo, J. (eds.) UCAmI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8867, pp. 396–403. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13102-3_65 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moreno, M.V., Hernández, J.L., Skarmeta, A.F., Nati, M., Palaghias, N., Gluhak, A., Van Kranenburg, R.: A framework for citizen participation in the internet of things. In: 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 815–820. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schulz, T.: Creating universal designed and trustworthy objects for the internet of things. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8524, pp. 206–214. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07485-6_21 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tekin, E., Coughlan, J.M.: An algorithm enabling blind users to find and read barcodes. In: 2009 Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathankumar, M., Sugandhi, N.: A low cost smart shopping facilitator for visually impaired. In: 2013 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp. 1088–1092. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bonetto, M., Carrato, S., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., Mumolo, E., Pellegrino, F.A., Ramponi, G.: Image processing issues in a social assistive system for the blind. In: 9th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), pp. 216–221. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carrato, S., Fenu, G., Medvet, E., Mumolo, E., Pellegrino, F.A., Ramponi, G.: Towards more natural social interactions of visually impaired persons. In: Battiato, S., Blanc-Talon, J., Gallo, G., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds.) ACIVS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9386, pp. 729–740. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-25903-1_63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    White, G.R., Fitzpatrick, G., McAllister, G.: Toward accessible 3D virtual environments for the blind and visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pp. 134–141. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bhargava, B., Angin, P., Duan, L.: A mobile-cloud pedestrian crossing guide for the blind. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication (2011)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carrato, S., Marsi, S., Medvet, E., Pellegrino, F.A., Ramponi, G., Vittori, M.: Computer vision for the blind: a dataset for experiments on face detection and recognition. In: 2016 39th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 1206–1211, May 2016Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stearns, L., Du, R., Oh, U., Wang, Y., Findlater, L., Chellappa, R., Froehlich, J.E.: The design and preliminary evaluation of a finger-mounted camera and feedback system to enable reading of printed text for the blind. In: Agapito, L., Bronstein, M.M., Rother, C. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8927, pp. 615–631. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16199-0_43 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., Aharon, D.: Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things. Technical report, McKinsey Global Institute (2015). http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/the-internet-of-things-the-value-of-digitizing-the-physical-world
  34. 34.
    G3ict: Internet of Things: New Promises for Persons with Disabilities. Technical report, Global Initiative for Inclusive Information and Communication Technologies (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilaria Garofolo
    • 1
  • Eric Medvet
    • 1
  • Fulvio Babich
    • 1
  • Giovanni Ramponi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of TriesteTriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations