Soil Structure Interaction Studies with Use of Geosynthetics in Soils Beneath Footings

  • R. Shivashankar
  • Nalini E. Rebello
  • V. R. Sastry
  • B. R. Jayalekshmi
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


The present study consists of two parts. In the first part, the effect of using a geomembrane (slip) layer in soil beneath footings under seismic excitations from shake table tests is being investigated. A triaxial shaker system is used to carry out the tests on a one-third scaled model of single storey, single bay RC space frame. The structure with different base conditions are subjected to sine sweep tests and simulated seismic excitation corresponding to the design spectrum for Zone III as per the Indian standard code (IS 1893 (Part 1): 2002). It is observed that the natural frequency of the structure decreases with increase in the flexibility of supporting soil In the second part, effects of using geosynthetic reinforced soil beneath footings of multistoried structures with tunneling operations beneath are being looked into. Numerical investigations on shallow depth tunnels like metro tunnels in granular soils, response due to tunneling itself (single and twin tunnels) and also their impact on the buildings above are carried out, using 3DEC software. Tunneling for metro causes innumerable changes in the form of distortion taking place in strata surrounding the tunnel, and also affect the member forces of framed structures on the surface. Height of superstructure and building eccentricities from the tunnel centre line are also varied. Results reveal that the presence of geosynthetic reinforcement in soil considerably reduces the displacements under footings.



The shake table tests were done under a BARC funded research project at the National Institute of Technology Karnataka, India. Shake table tests were performed at the Central Power Research Institute at Bangalore, India. The support of everyone is acknowledged.


  1. Franzius, J.N.: Behaviour of Buildings due to tunnel induced subsidence. Ph.D. thesis. Imperial college of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, 358 pages (2003)Google Scholar
  2. IS 1893 (Part I).:Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures - General provisions and Buildings. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Jayalekshmi, B. R., Shivashankar, R., Venkataramana, K., Ramesh Babu, R., Reddy, G.R., Parulekar, Y.M., Patil, S.J., Gundlapalli, P.: Shake table tests to investigate the efficacy of geomembranes for soil isolation in a space frame with isolated footing. In: 13th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, vol. 2, pp. 834-838, 9–11 May, Melbourne, Australia (2011). ISBN 978-098082442-1Google Scholar
  4. Mroueh, H., Shahrour, I.: A full 3-D finite element analysis of tunneling-adjacent structures interaction. Comput. Geotech. 30, 245–255 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rebello, NE.: Studies on tunnels subjected to static loads and blalst induced vibrations. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, India. 228 pages (2015)Google Scholar
  6. Rebello, N.E., Shivashankar, R., Sastry, V.R.: Response of strata and buildings to blast induced vibrations in the presence and absence of a tunnel. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 34, 1013–1028 (2016). doi: 10.1007/s10706-016-0021-y. Springer publishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Potts, D.M., Addenbrooke, T.I.: A structure’s influence on tunnelling-induced ground movements. Proc. Instn. Civ. Engrs. Geotech. Eng. 125, 109–125 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thurston, S.J.: Base isolation of low-rise buildings using synthetic liner. BRANZ study report SR17, BRANZ Ltd., Judgeford, New Zealand, 18 pages (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Yegian, M.K., Lahlaf, A.M.: Geomembranes as base isolation. Geotechnical Fabrics Report, September 1992, St. Paul, MN 55101–1088, USA (1992a)Google Scholar
  10. Yegian, M.K., Lahlaf, A.M.: Dynamic interface shear strength properties of geomembranes and geotextiles. J. Geotech. Eng. 118(5), 760–779 (1992b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Yoo, C., Kim, S.B.: 3-D numerical investigations of multifaced tunneling in water bearing soft ground. Can. Geotech. J. 45, 1467–1486 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Shivashankar
    • 1
  • Nalini E. Rebello
    • 2
  • V. R. Sastry
    • 3
  • B. R. Jayalekshmi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaMangaloreIndia
  2. 2.St. Joseph Engineering CollegeMangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mining EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations