Advertisement

Assessment of Granular Soil Failure at the Water Borehole Depth in South Eastern Nigeria by Discrete and Finite Element Methods

  • Kennedy C. Onyelowe
  • O. A. Ubachukwu
  • O. C. Ikpemo
  • F. O. Okafor
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

Failures of water boreholes that have impeded the performance and operation of boreholes have been recorded in recent times across the world and mostly in developing countries and within the south eastern Nigeria. To help solve some of the problems, the role of contact and seepage forces on the failure of water boreholes was explored. This study is important as the scouring of the particles collected at the wall of the transport pipe could damage pumps and result in huge financial loss to owners of boreholes. The combined finite-discrete element method was used to generate model expression from contact and seepage forces considered to be the major forces contributing to the flow of fluid through soil mass and boiling or quick sand effect. Mathematical model was developed for calculating the critical hydraulic head causing critical seepage given as \( {\text{h}}_{{\left( {\text{x}} \right)}} \, = \,0.000524{\text{r}}^{2} [{\text{X}}_{5} (5 - (2*{\text{SF}}_{{{\text{x}}_{2} }} ))] \) while an expression for the safe hydraulic head during well pumping was developed and given as \( {\text{H}}_{{\left( {\text{x}} \right)}} = 0.0065814.{\text{r}}^{4} {\text{X}}_{5} \aleph_{{{\text{x}}_{2} }} \). The ability of the model to predict results was verified using the results of the test conducted in the laboratory. Correlation coefficient result has shown that there is strong agreement between model result and the laboratory result which has shown a perfect correlation of 1.00 and 0.99 for the critical state condition and equilibrium state condition respectively. For safe pumping and corresponding yield in the borehole system, inter-granular force between granular particles should equal the seepage force and this is achieved by ensuring that the deduced model expression is used to determine the safe hydraulic head. Finally, irrespective of the fact that an increase in hydraulic head increases discharge, the system should be operated at a head safe for the performance of the well and as long as the model hydraulic head expression deduced is used under the above conditions, safe pumping can be achieved.

Keywords

Assessment Granular soil failure Water borehole depth South eastern Nigeria Discrete and finite element methods 

Notes

Acknowledgement

I wish to thank my research supervisor and mentor, Prof Fidelis O. Okafor for his immense contribution and help during this research work and especially to my friend Prof Emeka S. Obe for his assistance. I am also grateful to Geo-Drill Nigeria Limited, Umuahia, Civil Engineering Laboratory, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Niger Pet Laboratory, Uyo and Okey Electrical, Aba for their expertise.

References

  1. Abia State Ministry of Environment (2014), Geological Data of Umuahia, Abia StateGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society for Testing Materilas: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 19. Soil and Rock, Philadelphia (2007)Google Scholar
  3. Amorin, R., Broni-Bediako, K.: Application of Minimum Curvature Method to Wellpath calculations. Int. J. Eng. Math. Intell. 1(3), 69–80 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Baars, S.: Discrete Element Analysis of Granular Materials. TROISS, Netherland (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Bardet, J.: Experimental Soil Mechanics. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1997)Google Scholar
  6. Bell, N., Yu, Y., Mucha, P.J.: Particle Based Simulation of Granualr Materials. Eurographics Association, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  7. BS 1377.: Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes: British Standards Institution. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (1995)Google Scholar
  8. Bui, H.H., Sako, K.: SPH-based numerical simulations for large deformations of geomaterial considering soil-structure interation. In: 12th International conference at International Association of Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, pp. 570–578, 1–6 October, India (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Carbon Capture & Storage Class (UU & NMT), (2010), Autumn semester2010 supplimentary notes about GW flow equation-October 18, 2010, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheng, Y.P., Bolton, M.D., Nakata, Y.: Crushing and plastic deformation of soils simulation using DEM. Geotechnique 54(2), 131–141 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng, Y.P., Nakata, Y., Bolten, M.D.: Discrete element simulation of crushable soil. Geotechnique 54(7), 633–641 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chengchun, Q., Mengxi, Z.: Discrete element modeling of dynamic triaxial test on reinforced saturated sand. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(Z3), 10661–10672 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. Chukwurah, C.C.: Basic Borehole Technology and Practice. Olulu Publishers, Ekpoma (1992)Google Scholar
  14. Datta, M., Gulhati, S.: Geotechnical Engineering. Mcgraw-Hill Companies, New Delhi (2005)Google Scholar
  15. David, M.P., Lidija, Z.: Finite Element Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering Application. Thomasstelfold, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  16. Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K.: Advanced Technique for Reservior Simulation and Modelling of Non-conventional Wells. Final report to Standford University, USA (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eduvie, M.O.: Borehole failures and ground water development in Nigeria. A paper presented at a national Seminar held on the occasion of water Africa exhibition lagos, 15th November (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Ezomo, F.O., Akujieze, C.N.: Geophysical investigation of shallow aquifer in idoa village of Edo State, Nigeria. J. Emerg. Trends Eng. Appl. Sci. 2(5), 759–762 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. Fei, X., Nong, Z., Xiaowei, F.: The estimation method of the borehole stability based on unified strength criterion. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(4), 19065–19078 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. Ferdowsi, A.S., Shafipour, R.: Numerical Modeling of Undrained Cyclic Behaviour of Granular Media Using DEM, pp. 485–493. Society for Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology, Singapore (2009)Google Scholar
  21. Fernando, A., Muhlhaus, H.B., Herrmann, H.J.: Micromechanical investigation of soil plasticity using a discrete model of polygon particels. Theor. Appl. Mech. 35(1–3), 11–28 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. Fox, G.A., Heaven, D.M., Wilson, G.V., Eddy, J.L., Fox, A.K., Maria, L.C.: Numerically predicting seepage gradient forces and erosion sensitivity to soil hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 389, 354–362 (2010). ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frederic, V.D., Vincent, R., Magnier, S.: Advances in DEM applied to soil, rock and concrete mehcanics. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. Bouquet 108, 1–34 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. Fujisawa, K., Muvakami, A., Nishimura, S., Shuku, T.: Relations between seepage force and velocity of sand particles during sand boiling. Geotech. Eng. J. 44(2), 9–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  25. Gopal, R., Rao, A.S.R.: Basic and Applied Soil Mechanics R, 2nd edn. NAI Publishers, New Delhi (2011)Google Scholar
  26. Hailong, L., Haibo, B., Cheng, Y.: Macroscopic rules and application on bingham fluid flowing in the random fracture network. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(Z), 2931–2939 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. Huihui, C., Cheng, J.: Numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing process of rock mass based on F-RFPA. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(W), 6879–6886 (2014)Google Scholar
  28. Hui, Z., Deli, G., Wensheng, L.: Risk assessment of relief well based on analytic hierarchy process. Electron. J Geotech. Eng. 18(U), 5269–5277 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. Jianping, L., Yumong, C., Xinxia, C.: Vibration behaviour of drilling mechanism based on FEM and multibody dynamics. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(3), 2334–2355 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. Kharagpur, T.: The science of surface and groundwater; principles of groundwater flow, module 6, lesson 6, version 2, CE IIT, India (2013)Google Scholar
  31. Konikow, L.F.: Representing pump-capacity relations on ground water simulation models. Nat. Ground Water Assoc. 48(1), 106–110 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar, S.: Mud Engineering. Sivasagar Assets Publishing, India (2011)Google Scholar
  33. Limin, W., Yancheng, Y., Fei, W.: Fluid coupled-DEM modeling of pile- soil system under seismic loading. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(6), 1377–1391 (2015)Google Scholar
  34. Liu, Y., Wang, Z.: Particle flow numerical analysis of cohesive soil in direct shear test. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(Z), 9465–9478 (2014)Google Scholar
  35. Lu, H., Anderson, M.T., Likos, W.J., Mustoe, G.W.: A discrete element model for Kaolinite aggregate formation during sedimentation. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 32, 965–980 (2007). John Wiley and Sons Ltd, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mahabadi, O.K., Lisjak, A., Munjiza, A., Grasselli, G.: New combined finite-discrete element numerical code for geomechanical applications. Int. J. Geomech. ASCE 12, 676–681 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Manne, A., Neelima, S.D.: A review on the discrete element modelling of dynamic laboratory tests for Liquefaction assessment. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(1), 21–46 (2015)Google Scholar
  38. Munjiza, A.: The Combined Finite Discrete Element Method. Wiley, England (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nwaogazie, I.L.: Finite element modelling of engineering systems with emphasis in water resources. Chapters 1, 2, 3, 5 and 9. Special Publishers, Enugu (2008)Google Scholar
  40. Onah, H.N.: Different element methods in engineering practice. Niger. J. Technol. 31(3), 288–292 (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Pal, S.: Drilling Fluid Engineering. Pale Skalle and Ventus Publishing, London (2011)Google Scholar
  42. Pal, S.: Exercises within Drilling Fluid Engineering. Pale Skalle and Ventus Publishing, London (2012)Google Scholar
  43. Pan, H., Chen, M., Qin, R.: Considering the effect of reservoir water level lifting on the slope displacement analysis of seepage field-stress field coupling. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(3), 1447–1456 (2014a)Google Scholar
  44. Pan, H., Qin, R., Chen, M., Han, L.: The analysis of the seepage pore water pressure as reservoir water level is being lifted. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(R), 6749–6759 (2014b)Google Scholar
  45. Rasoul, A., Ameneh, F.D.: Evaluation of fluid flow from a dam foundation using numerical modeling technique by UDEC software. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18(I), 1787–1800 (2013)Google Scholar
  46. Rui, H., Tangdai, X.: Pseudo-dynamic analysis for seismic active earth resistance with steady seepage. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18(M), 2653–2666 (2013)Google Scholar
  47. Serdar, K., Recep, I.: Numerical analysis of groundwater flow through a rectangular cofferdam. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18(K), 2041–2052 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. Sergei, A.: Introduction to MATLAB (Basics). Technion, Texas (2013)Google Scholar
  49. Sergio, A.B.J., Fabio, A.P., Sergio, T., Fernando, S.A.J.: The influence of frictional coefficient of particles on numerical simulations by the coupled discrete element-fluid dynamics on morphology of density flows. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(3), 1003–1010 (2015)Google Scholar
  50. Shun-cai, L., Dan, M., Zhan-qing, C., Yu, L.: Experiment study of water seepage effect on the time-dependent deformation of granular coal gangue. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18(M), 2605–2616 (2013)Google Scholar
  51. Shun-cai, L., Ming-ming, W., Yu, L.: Grain size effect on the seepage properties of broken coal gangue. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(3), 851–860 (2015)Google Scholar
  52. Sivakugan, N.: Permeability and seepage. Int. J. Environ. Eng. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 289, 1165–1181 (2005)Google Scholar
  53. Soon, M., Mohd, A.M.I., Chee, G.T., Rais, Y.: Subsurface characterization using seismic refraction and borehole drilling for slope stability study. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(6), 1641–1650 (2015)Google Scholar
  54. Sun, J., Wang, H., Guo, S.: Numerical simulation on coal permeability change after pumping confined water from adjacent seams. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19(R), 4703–4714 (2014)Google Scholar
  55. Sutham, R., Warakorn, M.: The characteristic of aquifer drawdown and settlement of Bangkok and vicinity area. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 18(W), 5573–5584 (2013)Google Scholar
  56. Tianshou, M., Ping, C.: Wellbore Stability Analysis of Inclined Wells in the AY Field. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 20(4), 1313–1329 (2015)Google Scholar
  57. Zhang, J., Jiang, S., Wang, Q., Hou, Y., Chen, Z.: Critical hydraulic gradient of piping in sand. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, 20–25 June, Beijing, China (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kennedy C. Onyelowe
    • 1
  • O. A. Ubachukwu
    • 1
  • O. C. Ikpemo
    • 1
  • F. O. Okafor
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringMichael Okpara University of AgricultureUmuahiaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of NigeriaNsukkaNigeria

Personalised recommendations