Abstract
Happiness is defined as the subjective enjoyment of one’s life as a whole, also called ‘life-satisfaction.’ Two components of happiness are distinguished; an affective component (how well one feels most of the time) and a cognitive component (the degree to which one perceived to get what one wants from life). In this chapter, I present an overview of valid measures of these concepts, drawing on the ‘Collection of Happiness Measures’ of the ‘World Database of Happiness’. To date (2016), this collection includes more than two-thousand measures of happiness, mostly single direct questions. Links in this text lead to detail about these measures and the studies in which these have been used. In this chapter, I describe the differences and discuss their strengths and weaknesses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
‘Eudaimonic’ happiness is another word for ‘positive mental health’ and covers various traits deemed beneficial, such as autonomy, identity and meaningfulness. Most of the meanings addressed by this term fit the right top quadrant of Scheme 1 It is a fuzzy concept and several of its constituent cannot be adequately measured using self-reports.
- 2.
The last item in the SWLS is a question whether one would live the same life if one could live one’s life over again. The assumption is that happy people will want to repeat their life. Yet one can enjoy present life but still be open for something else.
- 3.
As assessed on August 30, 2016.
References
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being: Americans’ perceptions of life quality. New York, USA: Plenum Press.
BBC. (2006). The happiness formula. GfK-NOP poll 421059. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/happiness_formula/4771908.stm
Bhutan. (2012). Defining a new economic paradigm. Report of the high-level meeting on well-being and happiness, April 2, 2012. New York: United Nations headquarters. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=617&menu=35
Brulé, G., & Veenhoven, R. (2017). The ‘10 excess’ phenomenon in responses to survey questions about happiness. Social Indicators Research, 131(2), 853–870. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1265-x
DeJonge, T., Arends, L. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2014). Homogenizing responses to different survey questions on the same topic. Social Indicators Research, 117, 275–300.
DeJonge, T., Kalmijn, W., & Veenhoven, R. (2016). Dealing with diversity in survey questions on the same subject. Improving comparability across surveys and nations: Springer. in press.
Lama, Dalai, & Cutler, H. (1998). The art of happiness, A handbook for living. USA: Riverhead Press.
Danner, D. D., Friessen, W. V., & Snowdow, D. A. (2001). Positive emotions in early life and longevity: Findings from the Nun Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 804–813.
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2004). Are Scandinavians happier than Asians? Issues in comparing nations on subjective wellbeing. In F. Columbus (Ed.), Asian economic and political issues (Vol. 20, pp. 1–25).
Headey, B., & Wearing, A. J. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.
Headey, B., & Muffels, R. (2016). Towards a theory of life satisfaction Accounting for stability, change and volatility in 25-year life trajectories in Germany. IZA Discussion Paper No. 10058, Institute for the Study of Labour, Bonn, Germany.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082.
Kalmijn, W. M., Arends, L. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2011). Happiness scale interval study: Methodological considerations. Social Indicators Research, 102, 497–515.
Krosnick, J. A., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and questionnaire design. Handbook of Survey Research, 2, 263–314.
Kainulainen, S., & Veenhoven, R. (2016). Life satisfaction is more a matter of feeling well, than having what you want. EHERO working paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons of a new science. New York: Penguin Press.
Ludwigs, K., & Henning, L. (2016). How to measure subjective well-being—A practical review. HRO Working Paper, Happiness Research Organization, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155.
Newman, H. M., & Langner, E. J. (1981). Post-divorce adaptation and the attribution of responsibility. Sex Roles, 7, 223–232.
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.
Saris, W. E., Revilla, M., Krosnick, J. A., & Shaeffer, E. M. (2010). Comparing questions with agree/disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options. Survey Research Methods, 4, 61–79.
Schwarz, N., Knäuper, B., Hippler, H., Noelle-Neumann, E., & Clark, L. (1991). Rating scales: Numeric values may change the meaning of scale labels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 570–582.
Sen, A. (1992). Capability and wellbeing. In A. Sen, & M. Nussbaum (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel (now Springer).
Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life; Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39.
Veenhoven, R. (2009). How do we assess how happy we are? In A. K. Dutt, & B. Radcliff (Eds.), Happiness, economics and politics: Towards a multi-disciplinary approach (pp. 45–69). Cheltenham UK: Edward Elger Publishers. ISBN 978 1 84844 093 7, Chapter 3.
Veenhoven, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural measurement bias or effect of culture? International Journal of Wellbeing, 2, 333–353.
Veenhoven, R. (2015). Concept of Happiness. Introductory text to the collection of happiness measures, World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/introtext_measures2.pdf
Veenhoven, R. (2016a). World database of happiness. The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl
Veenhoven, R. (2016b). Bibliography of happiness. World database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_bib/bib_fp.php
Veenhoven, R. (2016c). Concept of happiness. Chapter 1 in ‘Introductory text to the collection of Happiness Measures’, World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/introtext_measures2.pdf
Veenhoven, R. (2016d). Measures of happiness. World Database of Happiness, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Available at: http://worlddatabaseofhappiness.eur.nl/hap_quer/hqi_fp.htm
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Veenhoven, R. (2017). Measures of Happiness: Which to Choose?. In: Brulé, G., Maggino, F. (eds) Metrics of Subjective Well-Being: Limits and Improvements. Happiness Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61810-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61810-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61809-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61810-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)