Microbial Community Responses to Contaminants and the Use of Molecular Techniques
Human activities threaten global ecosystems through the introduction of a range of contaminants. The potential effects of contaminants are commonly tested on organisms, or cell lines, in separate tests: one toxicant and one species at a time. The results have limited predictive capacity in complex ecosystems, and when they are used to calculate guideline toxicity values, multiple safety factors must be applied to mitigate this uncertainty. Community responses can provide a more realistic assessment of contaminant effects but may be more difficult to detect and interpret. In recent years, advances in molecular approaches have significantly improved our ability to investigate community responses at the micro scale. Microbial groups represent a major source of biomass and chemical activity in many ecosystems and they include many of the most chemically sensitive organism groups. Traditional microbial ecotoxicological studies have either measured impacts on diversity or on ecosystem function, with very few attempting to quantify both diversity and function at the same time. Molecular approaches to microbial ecotoxicology have the potential to reveal novel elements of ecosystem change such as the mechanisms behind functional responses to contaminants. This is crucial to understand because structural changes do not necessarily translate to a change in function and vice versa. Increasing our understanding of stress-related structural and functional changes in microbial groups that drive global biogeochemical cycles will enable highly relevant and sensitive predictions of the impact of contaminants on ecosystem health.
KeywordsMolecular methods Whole-community assessment Omics Contaminants Diversity Function
The authors received funding from the Australian Research Council through LP130100364 awarded to ELJ. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their comments, which helped to improve this chapter.
- Falkowski PG, Fenchel T, Delong EF (2008) The microbial engines that drive earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science (80) 320:1034–1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1153213
- He Z, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou J (Joe) (2013) GeoChip-based metagenomic technologies for analyzing microbial community functional structure and activities. pp 236–247Google Scholar
- Johnston EL, Mayer-Pinto M (2015) Pollution : effects of chemical contaminants and debris. Mar Ecosyst Hum impacts biodivers Funct Serv 244. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139794763.009
- Kraft B, Tegetmeyer HE, Sharma R et al (2014) The environmental controls that govern the end product of bacterial nitrate respiration. Science (80) 345:676–679Google Scholar
- Nguyen TC, Loganathan P, Nguyen TV et al (2014) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in road-deposited sediments, water sediments, and soils in Sydney, Australia: comparisons of concentration distribution, sources and potential toxicity. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 104:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oliver TH, Heard MS, Isaac NJB et al (2015) Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol Evol xx:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.08.009
- Ross-Gillespie A, Kümmerli R (2014) Collective decision-making in microbes. Front Microbiol 5:54. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00054
- Sun MY (2016) Impacts of anthropogenic modification on the taxonomic and functional structure of estuarine sediment communities. University of New South Wales, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Tlili A, Berard A, Blanck H et al (2015) Pollution-induced community tolerance (PICT): towards an ecologically relevant risk assessment of chemicals in aquatic systems. Freshw Biol 1–11. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12558
- Westerhoff HV, Brooks AN, Simeonidis E et al (2014) Macromolecular networks and intelligence in microorganisms. Front Microbiol 5:379. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00379