Public Art and Communal Space: The Politics of Commemoration in Amy Waldman’s The Submission



Amy Waldman’s 2011 debut novel The Submission may be read as an exercise in alternative history; in 2003, a jury is gathered in New York City to select the design for a memorial commemorating the victims of 9/11. When the chosen designer’s name is finally revealed, his identity as an American Muslim comes to the attention of the public, and controversy ensues about the appropriateness of his submission. Following the reactions of about a dozen different characters to the memorial selection process, the narrative revolves around the role of public art in the memorializing of collective traumas, the complexities of processes of collective mourning and public commemoration. As Félix Duque has argued, it is through such monuments that national identity has been traditionally codified as “the public” (2001, 167). This chapter sets out to explore several fundamental issues regarding the politics of commemorating 9/11, which Waldman’s novel brings to the forefront: the role it may play in enacting the redefinition of communal ties in the process of cultural trauma; the difficulties in the identification of the legitimate agents through which such redefinition is to be carried out (what Jeffrey Alexander would call “carrier groups”); the visibility and representation of victims in the public sphere; and the risks of manipulation and appropriation of the public sphere by interest groups.


American Muslims Commemoration Terrorism Public art Collective traumas Community 

Bibliographical References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C., Ron Eyerman, and Bernard Giesen. 2004. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Benedict. [1983] 2006. Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou, Alain. [1993] 2001. Ethics. Translated by Peter Hallward. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1984. Problems of Dostoevski’s Poetics, translated by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1993. The Rites of Assent. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Duque, Félix. 2001. Arte público y espacio político. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
  8. Edkins, Jenny. 2003. Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Frost, Laura. 2014. “Archfictions: Constructing September 11.” In Transnational Literature and Culture after 9/11: The Wrong Side of Paradise, edited by Kristine A. Miller, 198–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Gauthier, Tim. 2015. 9/11 Fiction, Empathy, and Otherness. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  11. Gray, Richard. 2011. After the Fall: American Literature Since 9/11. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Keeble, Arin. 2014. The 9/11 Novel: Trauma, Politics and Identity. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  13. Khadem, Amir. 2015. “Paucity of Imagination: Stereotypes, Public Debates and the Limits of Ideology in Amy Waldman’s The Submission.” In Representing 9/11: Trauma, Ideology and Nationalism in Literature, Film and Television, edited by Paul Petrovic, 67–78. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  14. Knight, Cher Krause. 2008. Public Art: Theory, Practice and Populism. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
  15. Lorentzen, Christian. 2011. “Shave for Them: Review of The Submission.” London Review of Books (33)18. Accessed on 30 November 2016.
  16. Mihaila, Rodica. 2014. “Healing the Nation, Memorializing Trauma: Ground Zero and the Critique of Exceptionalism in the Recent American Novel.” In Mapping Generations of Traumatic Memory in American Narratives, edited by D. Mihalescu, R. Oltean and M. Precup, 286–299. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  17. Miles, Malcolm. [1997] 2005. Art, Space and the City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. O’Gorman, Daniel. 2015. Fictions of the War on Terror: Difference and the Transnational 9/11 Novel. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Pacifici, Robert Wagner and Barry Schwartz. 1991. “The Vietnam Veterans Memorial: Commemorating a Difficult Past.” American Journal of Sociology 97 (2): 376–420.Google Scholar
  21. Pease, Donald. 2009. The New American Exceptionalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Simpson, David. 2006. 9/11: The Culture of Commemoration. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Smelser, Neil J. 2004. “Epilogue: September 11, 2001, as Cultural Trauma.” In Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, edited by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ron Eyerman and Bernard Giesen, 264–282. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  24. The Association of Public Art. “What is Public Art?”. Adapted from Penny Balkin Bach. 1992. Public Art in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Accessed on 30 November 2016.
  25. Waldman, Amy. [2011] 2012. The Submission. London: Windmill.Google Scholar
  26. Winter, Jay. 1995. Sites of Memory, Sites of Mourning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CórdobaCórdobaSpain

Personalised recommendations