Skip to main content

Internet Policy and German Copyright Regulation. A Subsystem Perspective to Assess Changes in Interest Group Dynamics and Policy-Making

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Democracy in the Digital Age
  • 2580 Accesses

Abstract

Despite the Internets’ transformative effect on information governance, e.g., copyright, it is very often neglected in practice and research on changes by and through Internet governance. To understand the policy-making in this area, the concept of a policy subsystem along the lines of the Advocacy Coalition Framework is introduced and special emphasize on Weible’s (2008) types of subsystems is given. As a typical case of European authors’ rights-based regulation, the German national policy on copyrights in the second half of the twentieth century is introduced as a policy subsystem. In two sections, we discuss two trends or descriptive hypothesis on the changes within copyright policy-making as it is revealed by existing research: Internationalization and the emergence of a national Internet policy subsystem assimilating copyright. As both trends are limited to date, both of the hypotheses cannot be verified (or have to be falsified for now). Internationalization impact is significant, but limited. Copyright subsumption to a new Internet policy logic is also limited to issue linkages. We thus offer a third, alternative description to the changes of the Urheberrecht subsystem: Drawing on the research literature and some own empirics, we can diagnose a change to adversarial subsystem dynamics within the last decade or every single category of Weible’s subsystem typology. Further research should fill empirical blind spots of the time before the changes as well as for causes, causal paths, or causal mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A possibility that was taken from the court later in the course of fights over hierarchy between it and the federal constitutional court.

  2. 2.

    It took over 30 years, if we include the different attempts since the Weimarian Republic.

  3. 3.

    WCT: WIPO Copyright Treaty; WPPT: WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty. WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organisation (of the United Nations).

  4. 4.

    Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.

  5. 5.

    Check the National Implementation Measures within Eur-Lex, the European Union Legislation Database on the stated Directives. Last access in May 2016.

  6. 6.

    The Weblog netzpolitik.org is the name-giving locus of the internet-policy-related activism in Germany.

  7. 7.

    This may or may not be due to the limited time span of the data set of only up to 2011, since activists claim the year 2012 as the climax of the “Urheberrechtsdebatte” (copyright debate).

  8. 8.

    Even more, the only pirate party member of the European parliament, the German Julia Reda, was rapporteur for the newest European copyright initiatives in 2015.

  9. 9.

    A similar interlinkage of copyright and telecommunication policy can be observed in the process of the EU Telecoms Package (Horten 2012).

  10. 10.

    Here, linkages to other fields or subsystems develop: on the one hand privacy questions intermingle with copyright regulations as rights holders are trying to enforce their rights (Nietsch 2014).

  11. 11.

    Up to 1994 the international copyright subsystem, in which all the territorially more limited subsystems are nested in, did only secure the same national rights for foreign creative works (Ellins 1997).

References

  • Benkler Y (1999) From consumers to users: shifting the deeper structures of regulation toward sustainable commons and users access. Fed Commun Law J 52(3):561–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghofer S, Sell S (2015) Online debates on the regulation of child pornography and copyright: two subjects, one argument? Internet Policy Rev 4(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (2003) https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berliner-Erklaerung. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • BMBF (2015) Startschuss für das neue Internet-Institut. https://www.bmbf.de/de/startschuss-fuer-das-neue-internet-institut-1336.html. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • BMWi (2016) Gabriel legt zur Eröffnung der CeBIT die Digitale Strategie 2025 vor. http://www.bmwi.de/DE/Presse/pressemitteilungen.did=757460.html. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Boyle J (1997) A politics of intellectual property: environmentalism for the net? Duke Law J 47(1):87–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braman S (2013) Internet policy. In: Consalvo M, Ess C (eds) The handbook of internet studies. West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell, pp 137–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Breindl Y, Briatte F (2013) Digital protest skills and online activism against copyright reform in France and the European Union. Policy Internet 5(1):27–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Breindl Y, Jakobi T (eds) (2017a) Arbeitsbuch Netzpolitik. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch A, Theiner P, Breindl Y (2017b) Internet censorship in liberal democracies - learning from autocracies? In: Schwanholz J, Graham T, Stoll P-T (eds) Managing democracy in the digital age internet regulation, social media use, and online civic engagement. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Consalvo M, Ess C (2013) The handbook of internet studies. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Bundestag (2002) Gesetz zur Regelung des Urheberrechts in der Informationsgesellschaft Drs 684/02

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch L (2015) Plädoyer gegen den Urheberrechts-Extremismus. http://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/streit-um-panoramafreiheit-plaedoyer-gegen-den-urheberrechts-extremismus-1.2555116. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Dobusch L, Quack S (2009) Internationale und nicht-staatliche Organisationen im Wettbewerb um Regulierung: Schauplatz Urheberrecht. In: Dingwert K (ed) Die organisierte Welt. Internationale Beziehungen und Organisationsforschung. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 230–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch L, Schüßler E (2014) Copyright reform and business model innovation: regulatory propaganda at German music industry conferences. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 83:24–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata U (2013) Krise und Transformation der Musikindustrie. In: Dolata U, Schrape J-F (eds) Internet, mobile devices und die transformation der Medien. Radikaler Wandel als schrittweise Rekonfiguration. Edition Sigma, Berlin, pp 67–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata U, Schrape J-F (2013) Medien in transformation. In: Dolata U, Schrape J-F (eds) Internet, mobile devices und die transformation der Medien. Radikaler Wandel als schrittweise Rekonfiguration. Edition Sigma, Berlin, pp 9–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommann M (2014) Autoren und Apparate: Die Geschichte des Copyrights im Medienwandel. S. Fischer Wissenschaft, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton WH, Peltu M (2009) The new politics of the Internet. Multi-stakeholder policy-making and the Internet technocracy. In: Chadwick A, Howard PN (eds) Routledge handbook of Internet politics. Routledge, London, pp 384–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellins J (1997) Copyright law, Urheberrecht und ihre Harmonisierung in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft: Von den Anfängen bis ins Informationszeitalter. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez OC, Meier HE (2012) Is the downloading of a new global IPR regime changing the EU? The second image reversed of intellectual property rights. In: Busch A, Hofmann J (eds) Politik und die Regulierung von Information. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 465–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz J (2013) Netzpolitische Entscheidungsprozesse: Datenschutz, Urheberrecht und Internetsperren in Deutschland und Großbritannien. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greis F (2014) Digitale Agenda. Ein Papier das alle enttäuscht. 20.08.2014. http://www.golem.de/news/digitale-agenda-ein-papier-das-alle-enttaeuscht-1408-108715.html. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Günnewig D (2004) Architecture is policy: politikwissenschaftliche Herleitung und Analyse eines Steuerungskonzeptes für digitale Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien am Fallbeispiel von Digital-Rights-Management- Systemen. Dissertation, University of Bochum

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunss S (2012) Innovation oder Piraterie? Framing-Konflikte um geistige Eigentumsrechte in der EU. In: Busch A, Hofmann J (eds) Politik und die Regulierung von Information. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 319–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunss S (2013) Conflicts in the knowledge society: the contentious politics of intellectual property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haunss S, Hofmann J (2015) Entstehung von Politikfeldern – Bedingungen einer Anomalie. der moderne staat. Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management 8(1):29–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunss S, Kohlmorgen L (2009) Lobbying or politics? Political claims making in IP conflicts. In: Haunss S, Shadlen KC (eds) Politics of intellectual property: contestation over the ownership, use, and control of knowledge and information. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 107–128

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horten M (2012) The copyright enforcement enigma: Internet politics and the “Telecoms package”. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hösl M, Reiberg A (2016) Netzpolitik in statu nascendi. Eine Annäherung an Wegmarken der Politikfeldgenese. In: Lemke M, Wiedemann G (eds) Text Mining in den Sozialwissenschaften: Grundlagen und Anwendungen zwischen qualitativer und quantitativer Diskursanalyse. Springer VS, Heidelberg, pp 315–342

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hucko E (2008) Fingerzeige zum friedlichen Zusammenleben von Bibliotheken, Wissenschaft und Urheberrecht. In: Schmitz W, Becker BV, Hrubesch-Millauer S (eds) Probleme des neuen Urheberrechts für die Wissenschaft, den Buchhandel und die Bibliotheken. Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden, pp 129–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Sabatier PA, Weible CM (2014) The advocacy coalition framework: foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In: Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, New York, pp 183–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones MD, Jenkins-Smith HC (2009) Trans-subsystem dynamics: policy topography, mass opinion, and policy change. Policy Stud J 37(1):37–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaess C (2012) Nutzung verwaister und vergriffener Werke soll neu geregelt werden. Transcription of interview with Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarenberger on Radio Deutschlandfunk. http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/nutzung-verwaister-und-vergriffener-werke-soll-neu-geregelt.694.de.html?dram:article_id=221669. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Kauert M (2008) Das Leistungsschutzrecht des Verlegers: eine Untersuchung des Rechtsschutzes der Verleger unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von $63a UrhG. de Gruyter Recht, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Klett AR, Sonntag M, Wilske S (2009) Intellectual property law in Germany: protection, enforcement and dispute resolution. Beck, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Krujatz S (2012) Open Access: Der offene Zugang zu wissenschaftlichen Informationen und die ökonomische Bedeutung urheberrechtlicher Ausschlussmacht für die wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindow S (2017) Magna charta, magna controversia. Politische Ideen und Interessen in den Urheberrechtsreformen für eine digitale Gesellschaft. In: Busch A, Breindl Y, Jakobi T (eds) Arbeitsbuch Netzpolitik. Springer, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Littoz-Monnet A (2006) Copyright in the EU: droit d’auteur or right to copy? J Eur Publ Policy 13(3):438–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löhr I (2010) Die Globalisierung geistiger Eigentumsrechte: Neue Strukturen internationaler Zusammenarbeit, 1886-1952. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maracke C (2003) Die Entstehung des Urheberrechtsgesetzes von 1965. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • May C, Sell SK (2006) Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool D (ed) (1995) Public policy theories, models, and concepts: an anthology. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietsch T (2014) Anonymität und die Durchsetzung urheberrechtlicher Ansprüche im Internet: grundrechtliche Positionen im Spannungsfeld. Tübingen Mohr Siebeck

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohrstedt D, Weible CM (2010) The logic of policy change after crisis: proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 1(2):1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohle J, Hösl M, Kniep R (2016) Analysing internet policy as a field of struggle. Internet Policy Rev 5(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA (1998) The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 5(1):98–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (1999) The advocacy coalition framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 117–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Weible CM (2007) The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarification. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 189–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Weible CM (eds) (2014) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffel F (2016) Netzpolitik als policy subsystem? Internetregulierung in Deutschland 2005-2011. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder J (1989) 40 Jahre Rechtspolitik im freiheitlichen Rechtstaat. Köln, Bundesanzeiger

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanholz J, Jakobi T (2016) The Digital Agenda Committee of the German Bundestag: a Pyrrhic victory for the institutionalization of Internet policy? Paper to be presented on the 24th IPSA World Congress 2016 of Political Science, Poznań (Poland), July 23–28, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell SK (2011) Trips was never enough: vertical Forum shifting, FTAS, ACTA, and TPP. J Intell Property Law 18(2):447–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Topal C (2014) Die Umsetzung der InfoSoc-Richtlinie in Deutschland und in der Türkei. Univ-Verl Göttingen; Niedersächsische Staats-und Universitätsbibliothek, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt R-M (2004) Die urheberrechtlichen Reformdiskussionen in Deutschland während der Zeit der Weimarer Republik und des Nationalsozialismus. Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Weible CM (2008) Expert-based information and policy subsystems: a review and synthesis. Policy Stud J 36(4):615–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westkamp G (2007) Study on the implementation and effect in member states’ laws of directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society. Part II: the implementation of the Directive 2001/29/EC in the member states. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/studies/infosoc-study-annex_en.pdf. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Working Group on Internet Governance [WGIG] (2005) Report of the working group on internet governance. Château de Bossey. http://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf. Accessed 02 Aug 2016

  • Zafonte M, Sabatier P (1998) Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. J Theor Polit 10(4):473–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Lindow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindow, S. (2018). Internet Policy and German Copyright Regulation. A Subsystem Perspective to Assess Changes in Interest Group Dynamics and Policy-Making. In: Schwanholz, J., Graham, T., Stoll, PT. (eds) Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics