Advertisement

Adjusting the Scope of Interaction Between State and Civil Society: HIV Prevention Among Drug Users

  • Aadne AaslandEmail author
  • Anastasia Y. Meylakhs
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the interaction between the authorities and non-state actors in HIV prevention among drug users. Based on case studies in Samara and St. Petersburg, it looks into the mix of vertical structures of governance (dominated by health authorities, including the regional AIDS centers, and drug control authorities) and aspects of network governance where both state and non-state actors collaborate on policy-making and implementation. The chapter concludes that the issue is largely left in a void outside the direct responsibility and attention of state agencies and governance networks. It is approached mainly by actors within the non-governmental sector which, for their part, do not have the resources or necessary authority to make the required policy impact.

References

  1. Aasland, Aadne, Arne Grønningsæter, and Peter Meylakhs. 2013. More are testing positive—But is everything negative? Russia and the HIV epidemic. In Global HIV/AIDS politics, policy, and activism, ed. Raymond A. Smith. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Aasland, Aadne, Mikkel Berg-Nordlie, and Elena Bogdanova. 2016. Encouraged but controlled: Governance networks in Russian regions. East European Politics 32 (2): 148–169. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2016.1167042.
  3. Aasland, Aadne, Arne Backer Grønningsæter, Peter Meylakhs, Elise Klouman, Tatiana Balaeva, Hans Blystad, and Andrei Grjibovski. 2011. The governance of HIV/AIDS prevention in North-West Russia: Description of a Joint Norwegian-Russian Project. Human Ecology (Экoлoгия чeлoвeкa, Arkhangelsk) 17 (12).Google Scholar
  4. Burki, Talha. 2015. Stigmatisation undermining Russia’s HIV control efforts. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 15 (8): 881–882. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00163-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hood, Christopher C. 1983. The tools of government. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Hood, Christopher C, and Helen Z. Margetts. 2007. The tools of government in the digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Krasnopolskaya, Irina, Yulia Skokova, and Ulla Pape. 2015. Government–nonprofit relations in Russia’s regions: An exploratory analysis. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (6): 2238–2266.Google Scholar
  8. Kuznetsova, Anna V, Anastasia Y Meylakhs, Yuri A Amirkhanian, Jeffrey A Kelly, Alexey A Yakovlev, Vladimir B Musatov, and Anastasia G Amirkhanian. 2016. Barriers and facilitators of HIV care engagement: Results of a qualitative study in St. Petersburg, Russia. AIDS and Behavior 2: 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. Lunze, Karsten, Fatima I. Lunze, Anita Raj, and Jeffrey H. Samet. 2015. Stigma and human rights abuses against people who inject drugs in Russia—A qualitative investigation to inform policy and public health strategies. PLoS ONE 10 (8): e0136030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malakhov, Vladimir S. 2014. Russia as a new immigration country: Policy response and public debate. Europe-Asia Studies 66 (7): 1062–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moran, Dominique. 2004. HIV/AIDS, governance and development: The public administration factor. Public Administration & Development 24 (1): 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moran, Dominique, and Jacob A. Jordaan. 2007. HIV/AIDS in Russia: Determinants of regional prevalence. International Journal of Health Geographics 6 (1): 22.Google Scholar
  13. Myhre, Marthe Handå, and Mikkel Berg-Nordlie. 2016. “The state cannot help them all”. Russian media discourse on the inclusion of non-state actors in governance. East European Politics 32 (2): 192–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olisova, Olga. 2015. The role of public consultative bodies in policy-making in the social sphere in the Samara Region. Oslo: Working paper.Google Scholar
  15. Owen, Catherine. 2015. “Consentful contention” in a corporate state: Human rights activists and public monitoring commissions in Russia. East European Politics 31 (3): 274–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pape, Ulla. 2013. The politics of HIV/AIDS in Russia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Pates, Richard, and Diane Riley. 2012. Harm reduction in substance use and high-risk behaviour. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Pisani, Elizabeth, Geoff P. Garnett, Nicholas C. Grassly, Tim Brown, John Stover, Catherine Hankins, Neff Walker, and Peter D. Ghys. 2003. Back to basics in HIV prevention: Focus on exposure. BMJ 326 (7403): 1384–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Putzel, James. 2004a. The global fight against AIDS: How adequate are the national commissions? Journal of International Development 16 (8): 1129–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putzel, James. 2004b. Public policy responses to HIV/AIDS in Africa. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. Sakwa, Richard. 2010. The dual state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs 26 (3): 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sidibé, Michel. 2014. The courage to reflect, question and commit. Moscow: UNAIDS.Google Scholar
  23. UNDP. 2007. Governance and HIV/AIDS responses: Issues and outlook. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR)Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesOsloNorway
  2. 2.International Centre for Health Economics, Management, and Policy, National ResearchUniversity Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation; Centre for Independent Social Research, Saint Petersburg, Russian FederationSaint PetersburgRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations