Skip to main content

Criminal Profiling Investigative Strategies for Arson Investigations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Behavioral Criminology
  • 3588 Accesses

Abstract

In 1986, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) entered into a unique joint venture with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) by detailing a veteran special agent to what was then the Behavioral Science Unit (BSU), a component of the National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC), located at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. The ATF agent began an intensive 9-month training program at the NCAVC in the relatively new discipline of Criminal Personality Profiling. Known as the NCAVC Police Fellowship Program, the training was offered to selected criminal investigators and detectives from throughout the United States and abroad (i.e., Canada, Australia, and the Netherlands), and certain US Federal law enforcement agencies. At the end of the training, the ATF agent remained at Quantico to provide criminal profiling services—primarily related to arson and bombing crimes—to ATF, the FBI, and other Federal, state, local, and international law enforcement agencies upon their request. Additionally, this first agent and the ones who followed partnered with their FBI colleagues to conduct research into the behaviors and motivations of arson and bombing offenders, resulting in a number of foundational publications in the field (Sapp, Gary, Huff, & James, 1994; Sapp, Huff, Gary, & Icove, 1995; Sapp, Huff, Gary, Icove, & Horbert, 1994; Sapp, Huff, Gary, Icove, & James, 1993; Sapp, Huff, Kelm, & Tunkel, 2001). Thus began a partnership, little known in mainstream media, that has lasted 30 years. The current author, an ATF Special Agent and FBI-certified Behavioral Analyst, was assigned to the BSU’s successor, the Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU)—for nearly 18 years.

The views and opinions expressed in this chapter are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the U.S. Government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, S. H. (1996). Statement analysis: What do suspects’ words really reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 65, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S. H., & Jarvis, J. P. (2006). Indicators of veracity and deception: An analysis of written statements made to police. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 13, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2006.13.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ault, R. L., Jr., & Reese, J. T. (1980). Psychological assessment of crime - Profiling. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 49, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandler, R., & Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs into princes: Neuro linguistic programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (1989). Instant rapport. New York, NY: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brussel, J. A. (1968). Casebook of a crime psychiatrist. New York, NY: Bernard Geis Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depue, R., & Schindehette, S. (2005). Between good and evil: A master profiler’s hunt for society’s most violent predators. New York, NY: Grand Central Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, P. E. (1985). Sex offender profiling by the FBI: A preliminary conceptual model. In M. H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Hucker, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behaviour (pp. 207–219). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., & Burgess, A. W. (1986). Criminal profiling: A viable investigative tool against violent crime. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 55, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., Burgess, A. W., Burgess, A. G., & Ressler, R. (1992). Crime classification manual: A standard system for investigating and classifying violent crimes. New York, NY: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., & Munn, C. (1992). Violent crime scene analysis: Modus operandi, signature, and staging. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 61, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., & Olshaker, M. (1995). Mind hunter: Inside the FBI’s elite serial crime unit. New York, NY: Pocket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). Telling Lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interviewing protocols to improve eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Reed, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Volume I: Memory for events (pp. 53–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2004). Using a forensic linguistic approach to track the Unabomber. In J. H. Campbell & D. DeNevi (Eds.), Profilers: Leading investigators take you inside the criminal mind (pp. 193–222). Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. R. (2005). Forensic linguistic services at the Behavioral Analysis Unit-1. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geberth, V. J. (1983). Practical homicide investigation: Tactics, procedures, and forensic techniques (1st ed.). New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelwood, R., & Michaud, S. G. (1999). The evil that men do. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelwood, R. R., Ressler, R. K., Depue, R. L., & Douglas, J. E. (1995). Criminal investigative analysis: An overview. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. W. Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 115–126). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (2014, April 9). Love and fire. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://washingtonpost.com/sf/style/2014/04/09/love-and-fire/ .

  • Howald, B. S. (2011). The transformation of spatial experience in narrative discourse (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from PQDT Open. (UMI 3459823).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelm, K. L. (2012a). Behavioral investigation of the arsonist: Observing offense behavior part 1 – The crime. Fire and Arson Investigator, 62, 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelm, K. L. (2012b). Behavioral investigation of the arsonist: Observing offense behavior part 2 – The criminal. Fire and Arson Investigator, 63, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelm, K. L. (2013). Behavioral investigation of the arsonist: Observing offense behavior part 3 – The crime scene. Fire and Arson Investigator, 63, 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnken, G. (2004). Statement validity assessment and the “detection of the truth”. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 41–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lanning, K. V., & Hazelwood, R. R. (1988). The maligned investigator of criminal sexuality. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 57, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrary, G. O., & Ramsland, K. (2003). The unknown darkness: Profiling the predators among us. New York, NY: HarperTorch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miron, M., & Douglas, J. (1979). Threat analysis: The psycholinguistic approach. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 48, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R. J., & McNamara, J. J. (2005). Serial Murder. In J. Payne-James, R. Byard, T. Corey, & C. Henderson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M. R., & Adams, S. H. (1998). Magic words to obtain confessions. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. (1990). Criminal investigation analysis: Sexual homicide. Quantico, VA: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime. (1993). Deviant and criminal sexuality (3rd ed.). Quantico, VA: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Behavioral Analysis Unit-2. (2005). In R. J. Morton (Ed.), Serial murder: Multi-disciplinary perspectives for investigators. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neer, T. M. (2011). Evaluating a potential criminal poisoning. In C. P. Holstege, T. M. Neer, G. B. Saathoff, & R. B. Furbee (Eds.), Criminal poisoning: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 19–30). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 665–675.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 269–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. E. (2000). The school shooter: A threat assessment perspective. Quantico, VA: Critical Incident Response Group, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. E., & Bowman, A. (2011). Dangerous instincts: How gut feelings betray us. New York, NY: Hudson Street Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinizzotto, A. J., & Finkel, N. J. (1990). Criminal personality profiling: An outcome and process study. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabon, D. (1996). Investigative discourse analysis. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ressler, R. K., & Shachtman, T. (1992). Whoever fights monsters. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, A. O. (1993). The firesetter: A psychological profile (Rev. ed.). Quantico, VA: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, J. R., Fisher, R. P., Robertson, B., & Mueller, D. H. (2014). Testing the cognitive interview with professional interviewers: Enhancing recall of specific details of recurring events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 917–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudacille, W. C. (1994). Identifying lies in disguise. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugala, E., & Fitzgerald, J. R. (2003). Workplace violence: From threat to intervention. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 3, 775–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safarik, M. E., Jarvis, J., & Nussbaum, K. (2000). Elderly female serial sexual homicide: A limited empirical test of criminal investigative analysis. Homicide Studies, 4, 294–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, V. A., & Adams, S. H. (2001). Subtle skills for building rapport: Using neuro-linguistic programming in the interview room. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 70, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, A. (1987). Scientific content analysis. Phoenix, AZ: Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Gary, G. P., Huff, T. G., & James, S. (1994). Motives of arsonists aboard naval ships. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 10, 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Huff, T. G., Gary, G. P., & Icove, D. J. (1995). A motive based offender analysis of serial arsonists. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Huff, T. G., Gary, G. P., & Icove, D. J. (1999). Serial arson and fire-related crime factors. In V. B. Van Hasselt & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of psychological approaches with violent offenders: Contemporary strategies and issues (pp. 397–416). New York, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Huff, T. G., Gary, G. P., Icove, D. J., & Horbert, P. (1994). A report of essential findings from a study of serial arsonists (2nd ed.). Quantico, VA: FBI Academy, National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Huff, T. G., Gary, G. P., Icove, D. J., & James, S. (1993). Arsons aboard naval ships: Characteristics of offense and offenders. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, Federal Bureau of Investigation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A. D., Huff, T. G., Kelm, K. L., & Tunkel, R. F. (2001). Behavior and characteristics of bomb related offenders. Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (Supervising Producer), & Wise, R. M. (Producer). (2000). Inside the mind of criminal profilers – Gus Gary. [Documentary]. High Road Films.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, A., & Tunkel, R. (2014). The assessment of anonymous threatening communications. In J. R. Meloy & J. Hoffman (Eds.), International handbook of threat assessment (pp. 195–213). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2008). From violent words to violent deeds: Assessing risk from FBI threatening communication cases. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures (pp. 435–455). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S., & Shuy, R. (2002). Forensic psycholinguistics: Using language analysis for identifying and assessing offenders. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 71, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of narrative reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101–119). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2014). Child abduction response plan: An investigative guide (p. 107). Quantico, VA: National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald F. Tunkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tunkel, R.F. (2017). Criminal Profiling Investigative Strategies for Arson Investigations. In: Van Hasselt, V., Bourke, M. (eds) Handbook of Behavioral Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61625-4_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics