Skip to main content

Incoherence Correction and Decision Making Based on Generalized Credal Sets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10369))

Abstract

While making decisions we meet different types of uncertainty. Recently the concept of generalized credal set has been proposed for modeling conflict, imprecision and contradiction in information. This concept allows us to generalize the theory of imprecise probabilities giving us possibilities to process information presented by contradictory (incoherent) lower previsions. In this paper we propose a new way of introducing generalized credal sets: we show that any contradictory lower prevision can be represented as a convex sum of non-contradictory and fully contradictory lower previsions. In this way we can introduce generalized credal sets and apply them to decision problems. Decision making is based on decision rules in the theory of imprecise probabilities and the contradiction-imprecision transformation that looks like incoherence correction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Augustin, T., Coolen, F.P.A., de Cooman, G., Troffaes, M.C.M. (eds.): Introduction to Imprecise Probabilities. Wiley, New York (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronevich, A.G., Klir, G.J.: Measures of uncertainty for imprecise probabilities: an axiomatic approach. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 51, 365–390 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bronevich, A.G., Rozenberg, I.N.: The generalization of the the conjunctive rule for aggregating contradictory sources of information based on generalized credal sets. In: Augustin, T., Doria, S., Miranda, E., Quaeghebeur, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Imprecise Probability: Theories and Applications, pp. 67–76. Aracne Editrice, Rome (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bronevich, A.G., Rozenberg, I.N.: The extension of imprecise probabilities based on generalized credal sets. In: Ferraro, M.B., Giordani, P., Vantaggi, B., Gagolewski, M., Gil, M.A., Grzegorzewski, P., Hryniewicz, O. (eds.) Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 456, pp. 87–94. Springer Verlag, Berlin (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brozzi, A., Capotorti, A., Vantaggi, B.: Incoherence correction strategies in statistical matching. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 53, 1124–1136 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Klir, G.J.: Uncertainty and Information: Foundations of Generalized Information Theory. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Quaeghebeur, E.: Characterizing coherence, correcting incoherence. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 56(Part B), 208–233 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Walley, P.: Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. Chapman and Hall, London (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey G. Bronevich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bronevich, A.G., Rozenberg, I.N. (2017). Incoherence Correction and Decision Making Based on Generalized Credal Sets. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10369. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61580-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61581-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics