Skip to main content

Expert Opinion Extraction from a Biomedical Database

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2017)

Abstract

In this paper, we tackle the problem of extracting frequent opinions from uncertain databases. We introduce the foundation of an opinion mining approach with the definition of pattern and support measure. The support measure is derived from the commitment definition. A new algorithm called OpMiner that extracts the set of frequent opinions modelled as a mass functions is detailed. Finally, we apply our approach on a real-world biomedical database that stores opinions of experts to evaluate the reliability level of biomedical data. Performance analysis showed a better quality patterns for our proposed model in comparison with literature-based methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A pattern is called frequent if its computed support (i.e. frequency in the database) is higher than or equal to a fixed threshold set by an expert.

  2. 2.

    A BBA is called a certain BBA when it has one focal element, which is a singleton. It is representative of perfect knowledge and the absolute certainty.

  3. 3.

    A BBA is said to be simple if it has at most two focal sets and, if it has two, \(\varTheta \) is one of those.

  4. 4.

    A BBA is said to be normal if \(\emptyset \) is not a focal set.

References

  1. Samet, A., Dao, T.T.: Mining over a reliable evidential database: application on amphiphilic chemical database. In: Proceeding of 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, Miami, Florida, pp. 1257–1262 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aggarwal, C.C., Han, J. (eds.): Frequent Pattern Mining. Springer, Cham (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, R., Srikant, R.: Fast algorithm for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Very Large DataBases, VLDB, Santiago de Chile, Chile, pp. 487–499 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aggarwal, C.C., Li, Y., Wang, J., Wang, J.: Frequent pattern mining with uncertain data. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Paris, France, pp. 29–38 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, D.A., Guan, J., Lee, S.K.: Generalized union and project operations for pooling uncertain and imprecise information. Data Knowl. Eng. 18(2), 89–117 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chui, C.K., Kao, B., Hung, E.: Mining frequent itemsets from uncertain data. In: Proceedings of the 11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Nanjing, China, pp. 47–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aggarwal, C.C.: Managing and Mining Uncertain Data, vol. 3. Springer, New York (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewawasam, K.R., Premaratne, K., Shyu, M.L.: Rule mining and classification in a situation assessment application: a belief-theoretic approach for handling data imperfections. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B 37(6), 1446–1459 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y., Weng, C.: Mining association rules from imprecise ordinal data. Fuzzy Set Syst. 159(4), 460–474 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bach Tobji, M.A., Ben Yaghlane, B., Mellouli, K.: Incremental maintenance of frequent itemsets in evidential databases. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, Verona, Italy, pp. 457–468 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dempster, A.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by multivalued mapping. AMS 38, 325–339 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The transferable belief model. Artif. Intell. 66(2), 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning. In: International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Paris, France, pp. 75–84 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoang, T.N., Dao, T.T., Ho Ba Tho, M.C.: Clustering of children with cerebral palsy with prior biomechanical knowledge fused from multiple data sources. In: Proceedings of 5th International Symposium Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making, Da Nang, Vietnam, pp. 359–370 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Samet, A., Lefèvre, E., Yahia, S.B.: Evidential data mining: precise support and confidence. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 47(1), 135–163 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smets, P.: The application of the matrix calculus to belief functions. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 31(1–2), 1–30 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is a part of the PEPS project funded by the French national agency for medicines and health products safety (ANSM), and of the SePaDec project funded by Region Bretagne.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Samet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Samet, A., Guyet, T., Negrevergne, B., Dao, TT., Hoang, T.N., Tho, M.C.H.B. (2017). Expert Opinion Extraction from a Biomedical Database. In: Antonucci, A., Cholvy, L., Papini, O. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10369. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61580-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61581-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics