Targeting Sedentary Behaviour at the Policy Level

  • Anthony D. Okely
  • Mark S. Tremblay
  • Megan Hammersley
  • Salomé Aubert
Part of the Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health book series (SSEH)


Policy level approaches are a promising and potentially powerful way to reduce sedentary behaviour at a population level. Ecological models have typically been used to reduce sedentary behaviour at a policy level. These focus on specific settings where policies may be present. This chapter examines home, workplace, education, transportation, healthcare, and nonhome-based leisure settings where sedentary behaviour reduction can be targeted at a policy level and the accompanying evidence for such policies along with important supporting factors. For policies to be effective in these settings, they also require shifting strong social norms to sit and should focus on benefits broader than health, such as increased productivity and academic learning and reduced traffic congestion. Government guidelines are a key policy component as are recommendations from non-government organizations. Current sedentary behaviour guidelines and stakeholder recommendations are summarised. A description of the national physical activity report cards is provided as an example of a successful policy initiative driving sedentary behaviour reduction in many countries. Limitations of the existing evidence and recommendations for future research are also included.


  1. 1.
    Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E. Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(9):1207–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Owen N, Sugiyama T, Eakin EE, Gardiner PA, Tremblay MS, Sallis JF. Adults’ sedentary behavior determinants and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):189–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan D. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization. Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity, Geneva. 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity and behavioural medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manini TM, Carr LJ, King AC, Marshall S, Robinson TN, Rejeski WJ. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(6):1306–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson TN, Sirard JR. Preventing childhood obesity: a solution-oriented research paradigm. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tonge KL, Jones RA, Okely AD. Correlates of children’s objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in early childhood education and care services: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;89:129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neelon SEB, Taveras EM, Østbye T, Gillman MW. Preventing obesity in infants and toddlers in child care: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(5):1246–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Puder J, Marques-Vidal P, Schindler C, Zahner L, Niederer I, Bürgi J, et al. Effect of multidimensional lifestyle intervention on fitness and adiposity in predominantly migrant preschool children (Ballabeina): cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 462–84.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    US National Physical Activity Plan Coordinating Committee. National Physical Activity Plan for the United States. 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    National Heart Foundation of Australia. Blueprint for an active Australia. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2014.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dietz WH, Gortmaker SL. Preventing obesity in children and adolescents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:337–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gortmaker SL, Cheung LWY, Peterson KE, Chomitz G, Cradle JH, Dart H, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:975–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hinkley T, Cliff DP, Okely AD. Reducing electronic media use in 2–3 year-old children: feasibility and efficacy of the Family@ play pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Robinson TN, Borzekowski DLG. Effects of the SMART classroom curriculum to reduce child and family screen time. J Commun. 2006;56(1):1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cornelius M, Carrie Armel K, Hoffman K, Allen L, Bryson SW, Desai M, et al. Increasing energy- and greenhouse gas-saving behaviors among adolescents: a school-based cluster-randomized controlled trial. Energ Effic. 2014;7:217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jancey JM, McGann S, Creagh R, Blackford KD, Howat P, Tye M. Workplace building design and office-based workers’ activity: a study of a natural experiment. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(1):78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ucci M, Law S, Andrews R, Fisher A, Smith L, Sawyer A, et al. Indoor school environments, physical activity, sitting behaviour and pedagogy: a scoping review. Build Res Inf. 2015;43(5):566–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    British Heart Foundation National Centre. Sedentary behaviour: evidence briefing. Loughborough University, Loughborough: British Heart Foundation National Centre; 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Carson V, Choquette L, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, et al. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(2):370–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Department of Health PA, Health Improvement and Protection. Start active, stay active – a report on physical activity for health from the four home countries’ Chief Medical Officers, London. 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thorp A, Dunstan D, Clark B, Gardiner P, Healy G, Keegel T, et al. Stand up Australia: sedentary behaviour in workers. Melbourne: Medibank; 2009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crespo NC, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Worksite physical activity policies and environments in relation to employee physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(4):264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Bhaumik S. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD010912.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Sluijs EM, Jones NR, Jones AP, Sharp SJ, Harrison F, Griffin SJ. School-level correlates of physical activity intensity in 10-year-old children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2–2):e574–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hinckson E, Salmon J, Benden M, Clemes SA, Sudholz B, Barber SE, et al. Standing classrooms: research and lessons learned from around the world. Sports Med. 2015:1–11.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Minges KE, Chao AM, Irwin ML, Owen N, Park C, Whittemore R, et al. Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20153087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parrish AM, Cliff DP, Salmon J, Trost SG, Batterham M, Okely AD. Breaking up prolonged sitting among secondary school students: the stand up for health cluster randomized controlled trial. 2016 (under review).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Morton KL, Atkin AJ, Corder K, Suhrcke M, van Sluijs EM. The school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a mixed-studies systematic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17(2):142–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Parrish AM, Okely AD, Batterham M, Cliff D, Magee C. PACE: a group randomised controlled trial to increase children’s break-time playground physical activity. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(5):413–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bocarro JN, Kanters MA, Cerin E, Floyd MF, Casper JM, Suau LJ, et al. School sport policy and school-based physical activity environments and their association with observed physical activity in middle school children. Health Place. 2012;18(1):31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, Manohar CU, Jensen TB, Mitre NG, et al. Changing the school environment to increase physical activity in children. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1849–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Erinosho T, Hales D, Vaughn A, Mazzucca S, Ward DS. Impact of policies on physical activity and screen time practices in 50 child-care centers in North Carolina. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(1):59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hesketh KR, van Sluijs EM. Features of the UK childcare environment and associations with preschooler’s in-care physical activity. Prev Med Rep. 2016;3:53–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Finch M, Wolfenden L, Falkiner M, Edenden D, Pond N, Hardy LL, et al. Impact of a population based intervention to increase the adoption of multiple physical activity practices in centre based childcare services: a quasi experimental, effectiveness study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lyn R, Maalouf J, Evers S, Davis J, Griffin M. Nutrition and physical activity in child care centers: the impact of a wellness policy initiative on environment and policy assessment and observation outcomes, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    De Silva-Sanigorski A, Elea D, Bell C, Kremer P, Carpenter L, Nichols M, et al. Obesity prevention in the family day care setting: impact of the Romp & Chomp intervention on opportunities for children’s physical activity and healthy eating. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(3):385–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Jones J, Wyse R, Finch M, Lecathelinais C, Wiggers J, Marshall J, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to facilitate the implementation of healthy eating and physical activity policies and practices in childcare services: a randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carson V, Clark D, Ogden N, Harber V, Kuzik N. Short-term influence of revised provincial accreditation standards on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status in Alberta, Canada child care centers. Early Childhood Educ J. 2015;43(6):459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Staton S, Smith S, Pattinson C, Thorpe K. Mandatory naptimes and group napping trajectories in childcare: an observational study. 2014 (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pattinson CL, Staton SL, Smith SS, Sinclair DM, Thorpe KJ. Emotional climate and behavioral management during sleep time in early childhood education settings. Early Child Res Q. 2015;29:660–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Huberty JL. After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(6):527–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robinson TN, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Matheson DM. Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African–American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. Ethn Dis. 2003;13(Suppl 1):S1-65–77.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ajja R, Clennin MN, Weaver RG, Moore JB, Huberty JL, Ward DS, et al. Association of environment and policy characteristics on children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and time spent sedentary in afterschool programs. Prev Med. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Beets MW, Huberty J, Beighle A, Moore JB, Webster C, Ajja R, et al. Impact of policy environment characteristics on physical activity and sedentary behaviors of children attending afterschool programs. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):296–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Beets MW, Weaver RG, Turner-McGrievy G, Huberty J, Ward DS, Pate RR, et al. Making policy practice in afterschool programs: a randomized controlled trial on physical activity changes. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):694–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    California Department of Education. California after school physical activity guidelines. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education; 2009.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Koohsari MJ, Sugiyama T, Kaczynski AT, Owen N. Associations of leisure-time sitting in cars with neighborhood walkability. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(6):1129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Koohsari MJ, Sugiyama T, Sahlqvist S, Mavoa S, Hadgraft N, Owen N. Neighborhood environmental attributes and adults’ sedentary behaviors: review and research agenda. Prev Med. 2015;77:141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sugiyama T, Merom D, van der Ploeg HP, Corpuz G, Bauman A, Owen N. Prolonged sitting in cars: prevalence, socio-demographic variations, and trends. Prev Med. 2012;55(4):315–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Heath GW, Brownson RC, Kruger J, Miles R, Powell KE, Ramsey LT, et al. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3:S55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagströmer M, Patterson E, Sjöström M. Congestion road tax and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brown V, Moodie M, Carter R. Congestion pricing and active transport – evidence from five opportunities for natural experiment. J Transp Health. 2015;2(4):568–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Coombes JS, Law J, Lancashire B, Fassett RG. “Exercise is medicine”: curbing the burden of chronic disease and physical inactivity. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP600–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tremblay MS, Haskell WL. From science to physical activity guidelines. In: Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL, editors. Physical activity and health. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012. p. 359–78.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tremblay MS, Gray CE, Akinroye K, Harrington DM, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert EV, et al. Physical activity of children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, vol. 4. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 465–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony D. Okely
    • 1
  • Mark S. Tremblay
    • 2
  • Megan Hammersley
    • 1
  • Salomé Aubert
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Social Sciences, Early Start Research InstituteUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research InstituteOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations