A Survey of Model Transformation Design Pattern Usage

  • Kevin LanoEmail author
  • Shekoufeh Kolahdouz-Rahimi
  • Sobhan Yassipour-Tehrani
  • Mohammadreza Sharbaf
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10374)


Model transformation design patterns have been proposed by a number of authors, but their usage appears to be sporadic and sometimes patterns are applied without recognition of the pattern. In this paper we provide a literature review of transformation design pattern applications, with regard to their effectiveness and range of use, and consider how pattern usage can be made more effective.


  1. 1.
    Amstel, M., Bosems, S., Kurtev, I., Ferreira Pires, L.: Performance in model transformations: experiments with ATL and QVT. In: Cabot, J., Visser, E. (eds.) ICMT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6707, pp. 198–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21732-6_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ATL Zoo, 30 November 2016.
  3. 3.
    Batot, E., Sahraoui, H., Syriani, E., Molins, P., Sboui, W.: Systematic mapping study of model transformations for concrete problems. In: Modelsward 2016, pp. 176–183 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bezivin, J., Jouault, F., Palies, J.: Towards Model Transformation Design Patterns. ATLAS group, University of Nantes (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sánchez Cuadrado, J., Jouault, F., García Molina, J., Bézivin, J.: Optimization patterns for OCL-based model transformations. In: Chaudron, M.R.V. (ed.) MODELS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5421, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuadrado, J., Guerra, E., de Lara, J.: A component model for model transformations. IEEE TSE 7(7) (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ergin, H., Syriani, E.: Identification and application of a model transformation design pattern. In: ACMSE 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Funk, M., Nysen, A., Lichter, H.: From UML to ANSI-C: an Eclipse-based code generation framework. In: RWTH (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hemel, Z., Kats, L., Groenewegen, D., Visser, E.: Code generation by model transformation: a case study in transformation modularity. SoSyM 9, 375–402 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hermann, F., Nachtigall, N., Braatz, B., Gottmann, S., Engel, T.: Solving the FIXML2Code case study with HenshinTGG. In: TTC 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hidaka, S., Tisi, M., Cabot, J., Hu, Z.: Feature-based classification of bidirectional transformation approaches. SoSyM 15, 907–928 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iacob, M.E., Steen, M.W.A., Heerink, L.: Reusable model transformation patterns. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, 2008, pp. 1–10 (2008). doi: 10.1109/EDOCW.2008.51
  14. 14.
    Johannes, J., Zschaler, S., Fernández, M.A., Castillo, A., Kolovos, D.S., Paige, R.F.: Abstracting complex languages through transformation and composition. In: Schürr, A., Selic, B. (eds.) MODELS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5795, pp. 546–550. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04425-0_41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurtev, I., Van den Berg, K., Joualt, F.: Rule-based modularisation in model transformation languages illustrated with ATL. In: Proceedings 2006 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2006), pp. 1202–1209. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kusel, A., Schonbock, J., Wimmer, M., Kappel, G., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W.: Reuse in model-to-model transformation languages: are we there yet? SoSyM 14(2), 537–572 (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kusel, A., Schonbock, J., Wimmer, M., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Kappel, G.: Reality check for MT reuse: the ATL transformation zoo case study. In: AMT 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lano, K., Kolahdouz-Rahimi, S.: Model migration transformation specification in UML-RSDS. In: TTC 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lano, K., Yassipour-Tehrani, S.: Solving the TTC 2014 Movie Database Case with UML-RSDS. In: TTC 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lano, K., Kolahdouz-Rahimi, S.: Constraint-based specification of model transformations. J. Syst. Software 88(2), 412–436 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lano, K., Kolahdouz-Rahimi, S.: Model-transformation design patterns. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 40, 1224–1259 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lano, K.: Agile model-based development using UML-RSDS. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Macedo, N., Cunha, A.: Least-change bidirectional model transformation with QVT-R and ATL. SoSyM 15, 783–810 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mokaddem, C., Sahraoui, H., Syriani, E.: Towards rule-based detection of design patterns in model transformations. In: Grabowski, J., Herbold, S. (eds.) SAM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9959, pp. 211–225. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46613-2_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Natschlager, C.: Deontic BPMN: a powerful extension of BPMN with a trusted model transformation. SoSyM 14, 765–793 (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tisi, M., Cabot, J.: Combining transformation steps in ATL chains (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tisi, M., Cabot, J., Jouault, F.: Improving higher-order transformations support in ATL. In: Tratt, L., Gogolla, M. (eds.) ICMT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6142, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13688-7_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Lano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shekoufeh Kolahdouz-Rahimi
    • 2
  • Sobhan Yassipour-Tehrani
    • 1
  • Mohammadreza Sharbaf
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of InformaticsKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Software EngineeringUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations