Advertisement

Redesigning Healthcare Systems to Provide Better and Faster Care at a Lower Cost

  • J. P. van der HeijdenEmail author
  • L. Witkamp
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

The use of information and communication technologies in the healthcare industry has been referred to as “telemedicine” or “e-health.” Our healthcare systems are facing big increases in demand due to growing elderly populations, rising chronic diseases, and the rapid development of new treatments; thus, the use of telemedicine is believed to be a part of the solution in restructuring and redesigning our healthcare systems. Despite often positive results, many telemedicine services remain stuck in a pilot or experimental phase and never make it to a larger implementation. The most important obstacle is the lack of structural financial reimbursement and available budget. In The Netherlands, we have developed and successfully applied our Health Management Practice (HMP) Model on a large number of telemedicine services using the “start small, think big” approach, leading to fully integrated telemedicine services. Results show a 70–96% reduction in hospital visits in dermatology and ophthalmology, which translates into an immediate cost reduction of 18%. Response times of 4–5 working hours and the learning effect have a high impact on the quality of care delivered. Telemonitoring programs in mental health have shown that involving the patient as an active actor can result in more motivation and ownership of their own health. Telemedicine also allows hospitals to remain focused on delivering high-quality specialized care. In many peripheral centers in residential areas, more routine care services will be delivered close to the patient by paramedics, caregivers, and patients themselves under the direction and supervision of a general practitioner and medical specialist at a distance.

Keywords

Telemedicine e-Health Healthcare redesign Telemonitoring Teledermatology Telecardiology e-Mental health Tele-ophthalmology m-Health Blended care Digital health Implementation 

References

  1. Broens THF. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(6):303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen S, Cheng A, Mehta K. A review of telemedicine business models. Telemed J E Health. 2013;19(4):287–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev. 1995;17(1):115–31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Haris F. IT Infrastructure Maturity Model (ITI-MM): a roadmap to agile IT infrastructure. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente; 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Khoja S, Scott RE, Casebeer AL, Mohsin M, Ishaq A, Gilani S. E-health readiness assessment tools for healthcare institutions in developing countries. Telemed e-Health. 2007;13(4):425–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. KSYOS Research. Anonymized database of all telemedicine processes. 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Mills A, et al. Health care systems in low- and middle-income countries. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:552–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mistry H. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(1):1–6. Epub 2011 Nov 18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ossenbaard H., Duivenbode J. Position paper: evaluatie ehealth-technologie in de context van beleid. In press.Google Scholar
  11. Preston J, Brown FW, Hartley B. Using telemedicine to improve health care in distant areas. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992;43(1):25–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Van de Wetering R, Batenburg R. A PACS maturity model: a systematic meta-analytic review on maturation and evolvability of PACS in the hospital enterprise. Int J Med Inf. 2009;78(2):127–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Van der Heijden JP, de Keizer NF, Bos JD, et al. Teledermatology applied following patient selection by general practitioners in daily practice improves efficiency and quality of care at lower cost. Br J Dermatol. 2011 Nov;165(5):1058–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Witkamp L, Zonder budget geen ICT-revolutie in de zorg. Medisch contact. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Witkamp L, van der Heijden JP. Health management practice as a method to introduce teledermatology: experiences from The Netherlands, Telemedicine in dermatology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.Google Scholar
  16. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2015. 2015; ISBN 978 92 4 156488 5.Google Scholar
  17. Wynchank S. and Van Dyk L., editors. A decision support tool for telemedicine project management. Prove your Hypothesis: telemedicine and eHealth in South Africa, 13–15 Sept 2011. 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and DevelopmentKSYOS TeleMedical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Medical Informatics, KSYOS TeleMedical CentreAcademic Medical Centre AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations