Automated Analysis of Lecture Video Engagement Using Student Posts

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10331)


This work explores the feasibility of a learning analytic that would provide high level engagement data to instructors based on students’ text artifacts in online learning systems. Student posts from an online lecture video system were collected and manually coded by engagement using the ICAP framework. Analyses show what features are most indicative of engagement and the performance of using a neural network to classify posts by engagement.



This work is funded by National Science Foundation grant IIS-1318345. Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.


  1. 1.
    Brinton, C., Chiang, M.: MOOC performance prediction via click stream data and social learning networks. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pp. 2299–2307 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breslow, L., Pritchard, D.E., DeBoer, J., Stump, G.S., Ho, A.D., Seaton, D.T.: Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: research into edXs first MOOC. Res. Pract. Assess. 8(1), 13–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 4, 304–317 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elson, J.S.: Formative assessment in an online asynchronous learning environment. University of Nebraska at Omaha (2016, Unpublished master’s thesis)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, X., Wen, M., Rosé, C.P.: Towards triggering higher-order thinking behaviors in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 398–407, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chi, M.T.H., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnold, K.E., Pistilli, M.D.: Course signals at purdue: using learning analytics to increase student success. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 267–270 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crossley, S., Paquette, L., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D.S., Baker, R.S.: Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 6–14 (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Waters, Z., Gasević, D., Kitto, K., Hatala, M., Siemens, G.: Towards automated content analysis of discussion transcripts: a cognitive presence case. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 15–24 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nebraska at OmahaOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations