Does Adaptive Provision of Learning Activities Improve Learning in SQL-Tutor?

  • Xingliang Chen
  • Antonija Mitrovic
  • Moffat Mathews
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10331)

Abstract

Tutored Problem Solving (PS), worked examples (WE) and Erroneous Examples (ErrEx) have all been proven to be effective in supporting learning. We previously found that learning from a fixed sequence of alternating WE/PS pairs and ErrEx/PS pairs (WPEP) was beneficial for students in comparison to learning from a fixed sequence of PS and WEs [1]. In this paper, we introduce an adaptive strategy which determines which learning activities (a WE, a 1-error ErrEx, a 2-error ErrEx or a problem to be solved) to provide to the student based on the score the student obtained on the previous problem. We compared the adaptive strategy to the fixed WPEP strategy, and found that students in the adaptive condition significantly improved their post-test scores on conceptual, procedural and debugging questions.

Keywords

Intelligent Tutoring Systems Worked examples Erroneous example Problem solving Adaptive strategy SQL-Tutor 

References

  1. 1.
    Chen, X., Mitrovic, A., Mathews, M.: Do erroneous examples improve learning in addition to problem solving and worked examples? In: Micarelli, A., Stamper, J., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9684, pp. 13–22. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39583-8_2 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durkin, K., Rittle-Johnson, B.: The effectiveness of using incorrect examples to support learning about decimal magnitude. Learn. Instr. 22(3), 206–214 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Große, C.S., Renkl, A.: Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: can this foster learning outcomes? Learn. Instr. 17(6), 612–634 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., Sweller, J.: When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. J. Educ. Psychol. 93(3), 579 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalyuga, S., Sweller, J.: Rapid dynamic assessment of expertise to improve the efficiency of adaptive e-learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53(3), 83–93 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLaren, Bruce M., Isotani, S.: When is it best to learn with all worked examples? In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 222–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitrovic, A.: An intelligent SQL tutor on the web. Artif. Intell. Educ. 13, 173–197 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ohlsson, S.: Constraint-based student modeling. In: Greer, J.E., McCalla, G.I. (eds.) Student Modelling: The Key to Individualized Knowledge-Based Instruction, vol. 125, pp. 167–189. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwonke, R., Renkl, A., Krieg, C., Wittwer, J., Aleven, V., Salden, R.: The worked-example effect: not an artefact of lousy control conditions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 258–266 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Najar, A.S., Mitrovic, A.: Examples and tutored problems: is alternating examples and problems the best instructional strategy? Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 9(3), 439–459 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Gog, T.: Effects of identical example–problem and problem–example pairs on learning. Comput. Educ. 57(2), 1775–1779 (2011)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xingliang Chen
    • 1
  • Antonija Mitrovic
    • 1
  • Moffat Mathews
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Computer Tutoring GroupUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations