Skip to main content

Fragmenting Munitions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Ballistic Trauma

Abstract

Energised fragments represent a heterogenous range of ballistic projectiles which are produced by an explosive event. Such encounters can occur in both the civilian environment due to terrorism as well as on the battlefield. In current conflicts fragmentation wounds have outnumbered those caused by bullets, with the UK and US experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan finding 74–81% of service personnel being caused by fragments [1, 2]. Bullet wounds tend to be more common in smaller scale conflicts such as the Falklands war or those involving jungle warfare or urban counter insurgency operations [3–5]. Excluding the effects of blast, the lethality of fragmentation weapons is generally far less than bullets, with the exception of artillery shells which produce large fragments at high exit velocities (in the region of 1500–2000 m/s) [6]. Hand grenades in particular are designed to produce a high number of small fragments and often incorporate spheres which are more aerodynamic and thereby increase effective range [7]. The result is to produce many multiply injured survivors that cause a greater burden on healthcare resources and the logistical chain. A large variety of munitions and devices are designed to produce fragments. Such munitions generally either utilise preformed fragments or the explosive force produced within the munition acts to break up the metallic casing (Table 3.1). Personal armour has altered the pattern of distribution of fragmentation injury so that the most common casualty seen on today’s battlefield will have multiple extremity, neck, and facial wounds (Chap. 7) [8]. All war wounds are inherently contaminated by organisms through soil, clothing, and skin, and this is potentiated in buried explosive devices such as mines. Bacteria include Clostridia, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Proteus, E. Coli, and Enterococcus, although infection is uncommon in small low-velocity wounds of the extremity. In addition, clinicians need to be aware of the presence of fungal infections (e.g. Aspergillus) following fragmentation injury. This is particularly common in incidents where the device has been buried in farmland. These infections result in significant morbidity, requiring multiple surgical debridements and often lead to sequential revision of amputation stumps [9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Penn-Barwell JG, Roberts SAG, Midwinter MJ, Bishop JRB. Improved survival in UK combat casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan: 2003-2012. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):1014–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Owens BD, Kragh JF, Wenke JC, Macaitis J, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Combat wounds in operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom. J Trauma. 2008;64(2):295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mellor SG, Cooper GJ. Analysis of 828 servicemen killed or injured by explosion in northern Ireland 1970–84: the hostile action casualty system. Br J Surg. 1989;76(10):1006–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardaway RM 3rd. Viet Nam wound analysis. J Trauma. 1978;18(9):635–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson DS, Batty CG, Ryan JM, McGregor WS. The Falklands war: army field surgical experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983;65(5):281–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurney RW. The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shell and grenades, Report No. 405. Dayton: Ballistic Research Laboratories; 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Breeze J, Leason J, Gibb I, Allanson-Bailey L, Hunt N, Hepper A, et al. Characterisation of explosive fragments injuring the neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51(8):e263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Breeze J, Breeze J, Allanson-Bailey LS, Allanson-Bailey L, Hepper A, Hepper AE, et al. Demonstrating the effectiveness of body armour: a pilot prospective computerised surface wound mapping trial performed at the role 3 hospital in Afghanistan. J R Army Med Corps. 2015;161(1):36–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Warkentien T, Rodriguez C, Lloyd B, Wells J, Weintrob A. Invasive mold infections following combat-related injuries. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(11):1441–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rottman GL. The hand grenade. 1st ed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hill PF, Edwards DP, Bowyer GW. Small fragment wounds: biophysics, pathophysiology and principles of management. J R Army Med Corps. 2001;147(1):41–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones RD, Ness LS. Jane's infantry weapons 2011–201. London: Jane's Information Group; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramasamy A, Hill AM, Clasper JC. Improvised explosive devices: pathophysiology, injury profiles and current medical management. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155(4):265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Baskin TW, Holcomb JB. Bombs, mines, blast, fragmentation, and thermobaric mechanisms of injury. In: Ryan’s Ballistic Trauma. 2nd ed. Ballistic Trauma; 2005. p. 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baskin TW, Holcomb JB. Bombs, mines, and fragmentation. In:Ryan's ballistic trauma. 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2011. p. 41–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Nechaev EA, Gritsanov AI, Minnullin IP. Mine blast trauma : experience from the war in Afghanistan. St. Petersburg: Russian R.R. Vreden Research Institute of Traumatology: Russian Ministry of Public Health and Medical Industry; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramasamy A, Hill AM, Hepper AE, Bull AMJ, Clasper JC. Blast mines: physics, injury mechanisms and vehicle protection. J R Army Med Corps. 2009;155(4):258–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramasamy A, Hill AM, Masouros S, Gibb I, Bull AMJ, Clasper JC. Blast-related fracture patterns: a forensic biomechanical approach. J R Soc Interface. 2011;8(58):689–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dowlen H. Cluster munitions: should they be banned? J Conventional Weapons Destruction. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dowlen H. Cluster munitions. In:Ryan's ballistic trauma. London: Springer; 2011. p. 57–66.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Ministry of Defence. 81mm mortar [Internet]. The British Army Website. The British Army; [cited 2017 Jan 4]. Available from: http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/23224.aspx.

  22. Ministry of Defence. GMLRS rocket launcher [Internet]. The British Army Website. The British Army; [cited 2017 Jan 3]. Available from: http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/23276.aspx.

  23. Oxley JC, Smith JL, Resende E. Determining explosivity part II: comparison of small-scale cartridge tests to actual pipe bombs. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(5):1070–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. National Academy of Engineering, National Research Council, Department of Homeland Security. IED attack. 2015. p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thurman JT. Practical bomb scene investigation. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomson JD, Lisecki EJ. Injuries and deaths from collecting war souvenirs in operation desert storm. Mil Med. 1993;158(8):505–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lein B, Holcomb J, Brill S, Hetz S, McCrorey T. Removal of unexploded ordnance from patients: a 50-year military experience and current recommendations. Mil Med. 1999;164(3):163–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Breeze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breeze, J., Ramasamy, A. (2017). Fragmenting Munitions. In: Breeze, J., Penn-Barwell, J., Keene, D., O'Reilly, D., Jeyanathan, J., Mahoney, P. (eds) Ballistic Trauma. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61364-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61364-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61363-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61364-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics