Advertisement

Hidden Geometry of Urban Landscapes for Smart City Planners

Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 125)

Abstract

Urbanization has been the dominant demographic trend in the entire world, during the last half century. Rural to urban migration, international migration, and the reclassification or expansion of existing city boundaries have been among the major reasons for increasing urban population. The essentially fast growth of cities in the last decades urgently calls for a profound insight into the common principles stirring the structure of urban developments all over the world. In the present chapter, we discuss the graph representations of urban spatial structures and suggested a computationally simple technique that can be used in order to spot the relatively isolated locations and neighborhoods, to detect urban sprawl, and to illuminate the hidden community structures in complex urban textures. The approach may be implemented for the detailed expertise of any urban pattern and the associated transport networks that may include many transportation modes.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support by the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology “CITEC” (EXC 277) at Bielefeld University, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

References

  1. Article: Auch Merkel zweifelt an Existenz Bielefelds (German)(Even Merkel doubts the existence of Bielefeld), Die Welt, November 27 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Batty, M.: A New Theory of Space Syntax, UCL Centre For Advanced Spatial Analysis Publications, CASA Working Paper 75 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, Ph., Volchenkov, D.: Introduction to Random Walks on Graphs and Databases. Springer Series in Synergetics, vol. 10. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19592-1. ISBN:978-3-642-19591-4
  4. Blanchard, Ph., Volchenkov, D.: Mathematical Analysis of Urban Spatial Networks. Springer Series Understanding Complex Systems, 181 pp. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2009). ISBN:978-3-540-87828-5Google Scholar
  5. Bolton, R.P.: Building For Profit. De Vinne Press, New York (1922)Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, M.: Urban ecology. Permaculture Design course handout notes. Available at www.self-willed-land.org.uk (2008)
  7. Glaeser, E.L., Gyourko, J.: Why is manhattan so expensive? Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Civic Report 39 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Golledge, R.G.: Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1999). ISBN:0-8018-5993-XGoogle Scholar
  9. Hansen, W.G.: How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Inst. Planners 25, 73 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hillier, B.: Space is the Machine: a Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press (1999). ISBN 0-521-64528-XGoogle Scholar
  11. Hillier, B.: The common language of space: a way of looking at the social, economic and environmental functioning of cities on a common basis, Bartlett School of Graduate Studies, London (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space (1993, reprint, paperback edition ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  13. Jiang, B., Claramunt, C.: Topological analysis of urban street networks. Environ. Plann. B. Plann. Des. 31, 151 (2004). Pion Ltd.Google Scholar
  14. Kimon, H.: Religion and New Immigrants: a Grantmaking Strategy at The Pew Charitable Trusts. Religion Program, the Pew Charitable Trusts (2001)Google Scholar
  15. Lovász, L.: Random Walks On Graphs: a Survey. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies 2: Combinatorics, Paul Erdös is Eighty, 1–46. Keszthely (Hungary) (1993)Google Scholar
  16. Lovász, L., Winkler, P.: Mixing of random walks and other diffusions on a graph. Surveys in Combinatorics, Stirling. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 218, pp. 119–154. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Mackey, M.C.: Time’s Arrow: the Origins of Thermodynamic Behavior. Springer, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  18. Orford, S., Dorling, D., Mitchell, R., Shaw, M., Davey-Smith, G.: Life and death of the people of London: a historical GIS of Charles Booth’s inquiry. Health and Place 8(1), 25–35 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortega-Andeane, P., Jiménez-Rosas, E., Mercado-Doménech, S., Estrada-Rodrýguez, C.: Space syntax as a determinant of spatial orientation perception. Int. J. Psychol. 40(1), 11–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Penn, A.: Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition. Or, why the axial line? In: Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Bafna, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Space Syntax 3rd International Symposium. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta (2001)Google Scholar
  21. Pollick, F.E.: The perception of motion and structure in structure-from-motion: comparison of affine and Euclidean formulations. Vis. Res. 37(4), 447–466 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Portes, A., Rumbaut, R.G.: Immigrant America: a Portrait, 3rd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley (2006)Google Scholar
  23. Prisner, E.: Graph Dynamics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Ravallion, M.: Urban poverty. Financ. Dev. 44(3), 15–17 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. Shilov, G.E., Gurevich, B.L.: Integral, Measure, and Derivative: A Unified Approach (trans: Silverman, R.A. from Russian). Dover Publications, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  26. Vaughan, L.: The relationship between physical segregation and social marginalization in the urban environment. World Architecture 185, 88–96 (2005)Google Scholar
  27. Vaughan, L., Chatford, D., Sahbaz, O.: Space and Exclusion: The Relationship between physical segregation. Economic marginalization and poverty in the city. Paper presented to Fifth Intern. Space Syntax Symposium, Delft, Holland (2005)Google Scholar
  28. Volchenkov, D., Blanchard, Ph.: Random walks along the streets and channels in compact cities: spectral analysis, dynamical modularity, information, and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. E 75, 026104 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Volchenkov, D., Blanchard, Ph.: Scaling and universality in city space syntax: between Zipf and Matthew. Phys. A 387(10), 2353 (2008). doi:  10.1016/j.physa.2007.11.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilson, A.G.: Entropy in Urban and Regional Modeling. Pion Press, London (1970)Google Scholar
  31. Wirth, L.: The Ghetto (edition 1988) Studies in Ethnicity. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick/London (1928)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mathematics & StatisticsTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Artificial Intelligence Key LaboratorySichuan University of Science and EngineeringSichuanChina

Personalised recommendations