Advertisement

Qualitative Assessment of a Clutch-Actuated Ankle Exoskeleton

  • Miha DežmanEmail author
  • Jan Babič
  • Andrej Gams
Conference paper
  • 3.4k Downloads
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 49)

Abstract

Among the growing number of different exoskeletons, passive and quasi-passive solutions hold the upper-hand compared to powered solutions in price, accessibility, complexity, weight and user acceptance. This paper evaluates a modification of an originally passive ankle exoskeleton with an active clutch, making it quasi-passive. We developed an electric quasi-passive clutch to improve the performance of the original exoskeleton design, with the aim of mitigating the problems on the clutch engagement timing and user physiological variability. In order to evaluate the exoskeleton and the clutch operation, we performed a study where 7 users wore the exoskeleton and performed trial walks. Qualitative user feedback that focused on the device comfort, users perception of exoskeletons effect and smoothness of the clutch operation was collected, along with quantitative data on clutch operation during walking on a flat surface. Results show improved and more reliable exoskeleton clutch operation which was also expressed in qualitative user feedback.

Keywords

Ankle exoskeleton Electric clutch Quasi-passive Wearable exoskeleton 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Partial support for this research (J.B.) was obtained from EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 731540 - An.Dy.

References

  1. 1.
    Dollar AM, Herr H (2008) Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Rob 24(1):144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Exoskeleton Report (2016) Exoskeleton catalog. http://exoskeletonreport.com/product-category/exoskeleton-catalog/. Accessed 23 Jan 2016
  3. 3.
    Ferris DP et al (2005) Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 11(2):34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asbeck AT, Rossi SMMD, Galiana I, Ding Y, Walsh CJ (2014) Stronger, smarter, softer: next-generation wearable robots. IEEE Rob Autom Mag 21:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gams A, Petrič T, Debevec T, Babič J (2013) Effects of robotic knee exoskeleton on human energy expenditure. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60(6):1636–1644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jimenez-Fabian R, Verlinden O (2012) Review of control algorithms for robotic ankle systems in lower-limb orthoses, prostheses, and exoskeletons. Med Eng Phys 34(4):397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang J, Cheah CC, Collins SH (2015) Experimental comparison of torque control methods on an ankle exoskeleton during human walking. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 5584–5589Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekso bionics (2016) EksoWorks exoskeleton. http://eksobionics.com/eksoworks/. Accessed 23 Jan 2016
  9. 9.
    Lockheed Martin (2016) Fortis exoskeleton. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/exoskeleton/industrial.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2016
  10. 10.
    Alexander R (1990) Three uses for springs in legged locomotion. Int J Rob Res 9(2):53–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chin R, Hsiao-Wecksler ET et al (2009) A pneumatic power harvesting ankle-foot orthosis to prevent foot-drop. J Neuroeng Rehabil 6(1):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dollar AM, Herr H (2008) Design of a quasi-passive knee exoskeleton to assist running. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. IEEE, pp 747–754Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elliott G, Sawicki GS, Marecki A, Herr H (2013) The biomechanics and energetics of human running using an elastic knee exoskeleton. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Dijk W, van der Kooij H, Hekman E (2011) A passive exoskeleton with artificial tendons: design and experimental evaluation. In: IEEE international conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR 2011). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Collins SH et al (2015) Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature 522(7555):212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diller S, Majidi C, Collins SH (2016) A lightweight, low-power electroadhesive clutch and spring for exoskeleton actuation. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA). IEEE, pp 682–689Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dežman M, Debevec T, Babič J, Gams A (2017) Effects of passive ankle exoskeleton on human energy expenditure: pilot evaluation. In: Rodić A, Borangiu T (eds) RAAD 2016, vol 540. AISC. Springer, Cham, pp 491–498. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-49058-8_53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Automation, Biocybernetics and RoboticsJožef Stefan InstituteLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate SchoolLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations