Advertisement

Oblivion or History: Two Different Ways of Coming Out of War

  • Ninon Grangé
Chapter

Abstract

Civil war has generally been considered as the opposite of war between foreign nations or states, and it has been experienced as a horrific exception. In this essay I wish to turn the paradigms upside down and consider civil war as a starting point, i.e. the unsettled period between two political entities. Coming out of war will result not only in the constitution of a new political arrangement, even if the system of government does not change, but also in the construction of a refreshed memory of the past war whose end is not easy to identify. There is therefore a short period of indecisive transition: ending a civil war is not usually achieved through a treaty in due form.

References

  1. Apter, Emily, “Fictions politiques, démarches impolitiques”, [www.raison-publique.fr, yet she only deals with the novel La chartreuse de Parme].
  2. Austin, John Langshaw, How to do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, eds. J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà, (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962).Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, Walter, “Zur Kritik der Gewalt”, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaften und Sozialpolitik, 1921; French edition: Pour une critique de la violence, Œuvres I: Mythe et violence, trad. Maurice de Gandillac, (Paris, Denoël, 1971), [Frankfurt a/Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1955].Google Scholar
  4. Ebguy, Jacques-David, “Reconfigurer le sensible: la fiction politique selon Jacques Rancière”, [www.raison-publique.fr].
  5. Foucault, Michel, “Il faut défendre la société” Cours au Collège de France, 1976, (Paris, Gallimard-Seuil-Hautes Études, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. Grangé, Ninon, De la guerre civile, (Paris, Armand Colin, 2009).Google Scholar
  7. Loraux, Nicole, La cité divisée, (Paris, Payot, 1997).Google Scholar
  8. Monod, Jean-Claude, La Querelle de la sécularisation. De Hegel à Blumenberg, “Problèmes et controverses” (Paris, Vrin, 2002).Google Scholar
  9. Pascal, Pensées, Lafuma 44, 1670.Google Scholar
  10. Rancière, Jacques, Le spectateur émancipé, (Paris, La Fabrique, 2008).Google Scholar
  11. Rancière, Jacques, Politique de la littérature, (Paris, Galilée, 2007).Google Scholar
  12. Schmitt, Carl, Ex Captivitate Salus Expériences des années 1945–1947, French trans.: A. Doremus, (Paris, Vrin, 23), included: “L’Amnistie – première forme du droit”, pp. 325–327. Original text: “Amnestie – Urform des Rechts”, Christ und Welt, no 45, 1949.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Paris 8Saint-DenisFrance

Personalised recommendations