Ethical Challenges in Researching with Children: An Application Adopting a Mixed Method Approach

  • Belem BarbosaEmail author
  • Pedro Quelhas Brito
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 621)


Applying ethical principles to research is essential to ensure both participants’ universal rights and data quality. From the ethical point of view, researching with children poses additional challenges in designing the research, collecting and analysing data. The ethical principles generally accepted in scientific research are complementary, yet presenting conflicts that must be anticipated and mitigated by the researcher. This article explores the application of ethical principles in research with children, considering the different stages of research and both quantitative and qualitative research, proposing a set of six ethical principles to be applied before, during, and after the collection of data. The text includes examples from research adopting a mixed-method approach which involved 779 participants aged 7 to 15 years old. The study demonstrates that there is a strong interdependence among ethical principles applicable to research with children, not devoid of contradictions. Even widely accepted principles such as informed consent are complex and multifaceted. Moreover, the adoption of mixed methodology, in this particular case, has proven to be able to create ethic synergies, making the research globally more balanced.


Research with children Ethical principles Mixed-Method research 


  1. 1.
    Hill, M.: Children’s voices on ways of having a voice: children’s and young people’s perspectives on methods used in research and consultation. Childhood 13(1), 69–89 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morrow, V.: Ethical dilemmas in research with children and young people about their social environments. Child. Geographies 6(1), 49–61 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mason, J., Hood, S.: Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Child. Youth Serv. Rev. 33(4), 490–495 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nairn, A., Clarke, B.: Researching children: are we getting it right? a discussion of ethics. Int. J. Mark. Res. 54(2), 177–198 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alderson, P., Morrow, V.: The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook. Sage, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryman, A.: Social Research Methods, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thomas, N., O’Kane, C.: The ethics of participatory research with children. Child. Soc. 12(5), 336–348 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diener, E., Crandall, R.: Ethics in Social and Behavioral Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1978)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    UNICEF: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF, London (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    UNICEF: Children participating in research, monitoring, and evaluation (M&E): Ethics and your responsibilities as a manager. Evaluation Technical Notes (2002). Accessed 13 Feb 2017
  11. 11.
    Christensen, P., Prout, A.: Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood 9(4), 477–497 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coyne, I.: Researching children: some methodological and ethical considerations. J. Clin. Nurs. 7(5), 409–416 (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Punch, S.: Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood 9(3), 321–341 (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Woodhead, M., Faulkner, D.: Subjects, objects or participants? dilemmas of psychological research with children. In: Christensen, P., James, A. (eds.) Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, pp. 10–39. Routledge, Oxon (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Morrow, V., Richards, M.: The ethics of social research with children: an overview. Child. Soc. 10, 90–105 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coyne, I.: Research with children and young people: the issue of parental (Proxy) consent. Child. Soc. 24(3), 227–237 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dockett, S., Perry, B.: Researching with young children: seeking assent. Child Indic. Res. 4(2), 231–247 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hood, S., Kelley, P., Mayall, B.: Children as research subjects: a risky enterprise. Child. Soc. 10, 117–128 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller, V.A., Drotar, D., Kodish, E.: Children’s competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings. Ethics Behav. 14(3), 255–295 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parker, A., Tritter, J.: Focus group method and methodology: current practice and recent debate. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 29(1), 23–37 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stewart, D.W., Shamdasani, P.N., Rook, D.W.: Focus Groups: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fern, E.F.: Advanced Focus Group Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bagnoli, A., Clark, A.: Focus groups with young people: a participatory approach to research planning. J. Youth Stud. 13(1), 101–119 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    David, M., Edwards, R., Alldred, P.: Children and school-based research: ‘Informed consent’ or ‘educated consent’? Br. Edu. Res. J. 27(3), 347–365 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alderson, P.: Research by children: rights and methods. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. Theor. Pract. 4(2), 139–153 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP) and Higher Institute of Accounting and Administration (ISCA-UA)University of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics of the University of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations