Skip to main content

A Mixed Methods Research of Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions about the Benefits of Wiki-Based Tasks and Discussion Boards

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Qualitative Research (ISQR 2017)

Abstract

The aim of the research was to explore pre-service teachers’ perspectives towards the use of wikis and discussion boards to improve writing skills and promote collaboration. A total of 358 pre-service teachers, enrolled in the subject English I, participated in it. They ranged in age from 20 to 58. We adopted a mixed methods research approach to integrate results and carry out a combined discussion that allowed making interferences to understand better and to have a broader vision of the phenomenon. The data analysis revealed the impact of the e-activities on the participants’ confidence in English. They emphasized the opportunities afforded by the wikis to promote individual and cooperative learning, and by discussion boards to communicate. In our research, we demonstrated that the use of a mixed methods research enhanced the validity and reliability of the data, and added rigor to researches in technology and second language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anguera, M.T.: Metodologías cualitativas: características, procesos y aplicaciones. In: Verdugo, M.A., et al. (coords.) Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales, pp. 141–155. Publicaciones del INICO, Salamanca (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arnold, N., et al.: Collaboration or cooperation? analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO J. 29, 431–448 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Attride-Stirling, J.: Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual. Res. 1, 385–405 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aydin, S.: Wikis as a tool for collaborative learning: implications for literacy, Language Education and Multilingualism. Sustain. Multilingualism 5, 207–236 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryman, A.: Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: a view from social policy. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 11, 261–276 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coleman, H., Unrau, Y.A.: Qualitative data analysis. In: Grinnell, R.M., Unrau, Y.A. (eds.) Social Work: Research and Evaluation. Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice, pp. 447–464. Oxford University Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Delgado, C.: Viajando a Ítaca por los mares cuantitativos, manual de ruta para investigar en grado y en postgrado. Amaru, Salamanca (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farabaugh, R.: The isle is full of noises: using wiki software to establish a discourse community in a Shakespeare classroom. Lang. Awareness 16, 41–56 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fitze, M.: Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Lang. Learn. Technol. 10, 67–86 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Franco, C.P.: Using wiki-based peer-correction to develop writing skills of Brazilian EFL learners. Novitas-ROYAL 2, 49–59 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., Baptista, P.: Metodología de la Investigación. McGraw Hill, México (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kessler, G., Bikowski, D.: Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 23, 41–58 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kol, S., Schcolnik, M.: Asynchronous forums in EAP: assessment issues. Lang. Learn. Technol. 12, 49–70 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., Zlatovic, M.: E-tivities with a wiki: innovative teaching of english as a foreign language, 1–13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lado, R.: Language Testing: Writing in a Foreign Language. Longman, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mak, B., Coniam, D.: Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. Syst. Int. J. Educ. Technol. Appl. Linguist. 36, 437–455 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE, Newbury Park (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miyazoe, T., Anderson, T.: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System 38(2), 185–199 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen, B.: Students’ perceptions and learning outcomes of online writing using discussion boards. JALT CALL J. 9, 131–147 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nunan, D.: Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pinto-Llorente, A.M., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., García-Peñalvo, F.J.: To be or not to be successful? that does not only depend on technology, but also on human factors. J. Cases Inf. Technol. 17, 51–69 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinto-Llorente, A.M., et al.: Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in english as a second language. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 632–643 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pressley, M.: What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In: Kamil, M., Mosenthal, P., Pearson, P.D., Barr, R. (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, pp. 545–561. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto, pp. 11–30 (2015). monográfico

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., Valcke, M.: Scripting by assigning roles: does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups? Int. J. Comput. Support. Collaborative Learn. 2, 225–246 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Twu, H.: A predictive study of wiki interaction: can attitude toward wiki predict wiki interaction in high-context cultures groups? J. Educ. Technol. Dev. Exch. 3, 57–68 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Usó, E., Martínez, A.: Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wichadee, S.: Improving students’ summary writing ability through and conventional face-to-face group. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol. 12, 107–116 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woolley, G.: Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties. Springer, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana María Pinto-Llorente .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pinto-Llorente, A.M., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2018). A Mixed Methods Research of Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions about the Benefits of Wiki-Based Tasks and Discussion Boards. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Souza, F., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61120-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61121-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics